Mendeleyev V Ya, Skovorodko S N
Joint Institute for High Temperatures, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
Opt Express. 2011 Mar 28;19(7):6822-8. doi: 10.1364/OE.19.006822.
To estimate the root mean square roughness (σ) of a surface from reflected power, it is necessary to know the diffuse reflectance (DR) and the reflectance (SSR) of a smooth surface made from the same material as the rough surface. In our study, σ is estimated from value of power reflected from one-dimensionally rough steel surfaces in the specular direction without considering SSR and DR. An expression describing dependence of an error of the estimation on SSR and DR is derived. Linear polarized light with λ=660 nm and the azimuth of polarization of 49° was used in the experiment. The angle of incidence was varied from 30° to 74°. It was found that absolute relative errors caused by influence of SSR and DR are smaller than 0.03 in the angular ranges of 46-54° and 30-58° for σ=10.2 nm and σ = 49.8 nm, respectively. Out of these ranges, SSR is the main reason for the errors lying in the wide range of ~0.05-2.5.
要根据反射功率估算表面的均方根粗糙度(σ),有必要知道由与粗糙表面相同材料制成的光滑表面的漫反射率(DR)和镜面反射率(SSR)。在我们的研究中,σ是从一维粗糙钢表面在镜面方向反射的功率值估算得出的,未考虑SSR和DR。推导了一个描述估算误差对SSR和DR依赖性的表达式。实验中使用了波长λ = 660 nm、偏振方位角为49°的线偏振光。入射角在30°至74°之间变化。结果发现,对于σ = 10.2 nm和σ = 49.8 nm,在46 - 54°和30 - 58°的角度范围内,由SSR和DR影响引起的绝对相对误差分别小于0.03。在这些范围之外,SSR是误差处于~0.05 - 2.5宽范围内的主要原因。