Suppr超能文献

胶囊内镜在心脏起搏器和植入式心脏复律除颤器患者中的应用 - 一项回顾性多中心研究。

Capsule endoscopy in patients with cardiac pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators - a retrospective multicenter investigation.

机构信息

Universität Gießen, Gießen, Germany.

出版信息

J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2011 Mar;20(1):33-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Capsule endoscopy (CE) is an established tool for the investigation of the small intestine. The Food and Drug Administration, Given Imaging and Olympus have not recommended the use of capsule endoscopy in patients with cardiac pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs). The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the safety of capsule endoscopy systems (Given Imaging and Olympus) when applied in patients with different types of pacemakers/ICDs in vivo.

METHODS

A standardized questionnaire was sent to high volume centers in Germany and in Austria. The questionnaire covered the age and gender of the examined patients, indication of CE, brand and type of CE, brand and model of pacemaker/ICD, check of the devices before and after CE, monitoring during CE, possible interference between CE and cardiac pacemakers/ICDs and possible adverse events during CE.

RESULTS

Data from 62 patients were retrieved for this study. Capsules used were Given Imaging (n=58; M2A, M2Aplus, PillCam SB2), Olympus EndoCapsule (n=3), Given PillCam Colon (n=1). The collective included patients with pacemakers/ICDS from seven brands (Biotronik, Medtronic, St. Jude Medical, Guidant, Boston Scientific, Ela Sorin, Vitatron) with a total of 19/8 (pacemaker/ICD) different types. In two patients interference between capsule endoscopy and telemetry (loss of images/gaps in video) was recorded. None of the cardiac pacemakers or ICDs was impaired in function. No clinically evident event was observed in any of these patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical use of these CE types is safe in patients with cardiac pacemakers and ICDs. Interference can occur between CE and ECG-telemetry leading to loss of images or impaired quality of video.

摘要

背景与目的

胶囊内镜(CE)是一种用于小肠检查的成熟工具。美国食品和药物管理局、Given Imaging 和奥林巴斯公司均不建议在装有心脏起搏器和植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)的患者中使用胶囊内镜。本回顾性研究旨在体内研究不同类型心脏起搏器/ICD 患者使用胶囊内镜系统(Given Imaging 和奥林巴斯)的安全性。

方法

向德国和奥地利的大容量中心发送了标准化问卷。问卷涵盖了接受检查患者的年龄和性别、CE 适应证、CE 品牌和类型、心脏起搏器/ICD 的品牌和型号、CE 前后设备检查、CE 期间监测、CE 与心脏起搏器/ICD 之间的可能干扰以及 CE 期间可能出现的不良事件。

结果

本研究共检索到 62 例患者的数据。使用的胶囊包括 Given Imaging(n=58;M2A、M2Aplus、PillCam SB2)、奥林巴斯 EndoCapsule(n=3)、Given PillCam Colon(n=1)。该研究包括来自 7 个品牌(Biotronik、Medtronic、St. Jude Medical、Guidant、Boston Scientific、Ela Sorin、Vitatron)的起搏器/ICD 患者,共计 19/8(起搏器/ICD)种不同类型。在 2 例患者中,记录到胶囊内镜与遥测之间存在干扰(图像丢失/视频出现间隙)。心脏起搏器或 ICD 均未出现功能障碍。在这些患者中均未观察到任何临床明显的不良事件。

结论

在患有心脏起搏器和 ICD 的患者中,使用这些 CE 类型是安全的。CE 与心电图遥测之间可能会发生干扰,导致图像丢失或视频质量受损。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验