Genovese M C, Kinnman N, de La Bourdonnaye G, Pena Rossi C, Tak P P
Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Arthritis Rheum. 2011 Jul;63(7):1793-803. doi: 10.1002/art.30373.
To assess the efficacy, safety, and biologic activity of atacicept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in whom the response to treatment with tumor necrosis factor antagonists was inadequate.
The Atacicept for Reduction of Signs and Symptoms in Rheumatoid Arthritis Trial (AUGUST I) was a multicenter, phase II, double-blind, placebo-controlled dose-finding study involving 256 patients randomized 1:1:1:1 to receive atacicept (25 mg, 75 mg, or 150 mg) or placebo twice weekly for 4 weeks, then weekly for 21 weeks, with a 13-week treatment-free followup period (week 38). The primary end point was a response at week 26 according to the American College of Rheumatology criteria for 20% improvement in disease severity, using the C-reactive protein level.
No statistically significant differences were observed in the efficacy end points at week 26 (P = 0.410 for overall treatment effect). However, atacicept significantly reduced immunoglobulin and rheumatoid factor (RF) levels, but not anti-citrullinated protein antibody levels, in a dose-dependent manner, with levels returning toward baseline values during followup. The effects of treatment on IgG-RF and IgA-RF were more pronounced than the effects on total IgG and IgA. Adverse events (AEs), including serious AEs, leading to withdrawal were more common among patients treated with atacicept compared with placebo. AEs were variable in nature, and no dose-dependent trends were observed. The frequency of infection-related AEs was similar across treatments. No notable effect of treatment on immunization status (protective versus nonprotective titer) was observed after initiation of treatment.
This study did not meet the primary efficacy end point. However, clear biologic activity consistent with the proposed mechanism of action was observed. The results suggest that decreasing the expression of RF may not be sufficient to induce clinical improvement in RA. The safety of atacicept was considered acceptable in this patient population.
评估阿他西普对肿瘤坏死因子拮抗剂治疗反应不足的类风湿关节炎(RA)患者的疗效、安全性及生物学活性。
类风湿关节炎症状体征减轻阿他西普试验(AUGUST I)是一项多中心、II期、双盲、安慰剂对照的剂量探索性研究,纳入256例患者,按1:1:1:1随机分组,接受阿他西普(25 mg、75 mg或150 mg)或安慰剂治疗,每周两次,共4周,之后每周一次,共21周,有13周的无治疗随访期(第38周)。主要终点是根据美国风湿病学会标准,在第26周时疾病严重程度改善20%的反应,采用C反应蛋白水平进行评估。
在第26周时,疗效终点未观察到统计学显著差异(总体治疗效果P = 0.410)。然而,阿他西普以剂量依赖方式显著降低免疫球蛋白和类风湿因子(RF)水平,但不降低抗瓜氨酸化蛋白抗体水平,随访期间水平恢复至基线值。治疗对IgG-RF和IgA-RF的影响比对总IgG和IgA的影响更明显。与安慰剂相比,接受阿他西普治疗的患者中导致停药的不良事件(AE),包括严重AE,更为常见。AE性质各异,未观察到剂量依赖趋势。各治疗组感染相关AE的发生频率相似。治疗开始后,未观察到治疗对免疫状态(保护性与非保护性滴度)有显著影响。
本研究未达到主要疗效终点。然而,观察到与提出的作用机制一致的明确生物学活性。结果表明,降低RF表达可能不足以诱导RA临床改善。在该患者群体中,阿他西普的安全性被认为是可接受的。