Bioeng. Dept., Politecnico di Milano, p.zza Leonardo Da Vinci 32, 20133, Milano, Italy.
Res Dev Disabil. 2011 Sep-Oct;32(5):1722-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.02.028. Epub 2011 Mar 31.
This study aimed to quantify and compare the gait pattern in Ehlers-Danlos (EDS) and Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) patients to provide data for developing evidence-based rehabilitation strategies. Twenty EDS and 19 PWS adult patients were evaluated with an optoelectronic system and force platforms for measuring kinematic and kinetic parameters during walking. The results were compared with those obtained in a group of 20 normal-weight controls (CG). The results showed that PWS patients walked with longer stance duration and reduced velocity than EDS, close to CG. Both EDS and PWS showed reduced anterior step length than CG. EDS kinematics evidenced a physiological position at proximal joints (pelvis and hip joint) while some deficits were displayed at knee (reduced flexion in swing phase) and ankle level (plantar flexed position in stance and reduced dorsal flexion in swing). PWS showed a forward tilted pelvis in the sagittal plane, excessive hip flexion during the whole gait cycle and an increased hip movement in the frontal plane. Their knees were flexed at initial contact with reduced range of motion while ankle joints showed a plantar flexed position during stance. No differences were found in terms of ankle kinetics and joint stiffness. Our data showed that EDS and PWS patients were characterized by a different gait strategy: PWS showed functional limitations at every level of the lower limb joints, whereas in EDS limitations, greater than PWS, were reported mainly at the distal joints. PWS patients should be encouraged to walk for its positive impact on muscle mass and strength and energy balance. For EDS patients the rehabilitation program should be focused on ankle strategy improvement.
本研究旨在量化和比较 Ehlers-Danlos(EDS)和 Prader-Willi 综合征(PWS)患者的步态模式,为制定基于证据的康复策略提供数据。我们评估了 20 名 EDS 和 19 名 PWS 成年患者的运动学和动力学参数,使用光电系统和力平台进行测量。结果与 20 名正常体重对照组(CG)的结果进行了比较。结果表明,与 EDS 相比,PWS 患者的站立时间更长,行走速度更慢,接近 CG。EDS 和 PWS 患者的前步长均小于 CG。EDS 的运动学在近端关节(骨盆和髋关节)表现出生理性位置,而在膝关节(摆动期屈曲减少)和踝关节(站立时跖屈和摆动时背屈减少)水平则存在一些缺陷。PWS 在矢状面呈现骨盆前倾,整个步态周期髋关节过度弯曲,髋关节在额状面移动增加。他们的膝关节在初始接触时弯曲,运动范围减小,而踝关节在站立时呈跖屈位。踝关节动力学和关节刚度没有差异。我们的数据表明,EDS 和 PWS 患者的步态策略不同:PWS 患者在下肢关节的各个水平都存在功能限制,而 EDS 患者则报告主要在远端关节存在更大的限制。应鼓励 PWS 患者行走,因为这对肌肉质量和力量以及能量平衡有积极影响。对于 EDS 患者,康复计划应侧重于改善踝关节策略。