• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超声 BI-RADS 4 类的再分类:阳性预测值及其影响因素。

Subcategorization of ultrasonographic BI-RADS category 4: positive predictive value and clinical factors affecting it.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Ultrasound Med Biol. 2011 May;37(5):693-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2011.02.009. Epub 2011 Mar 31.

DOI:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2011.02.009
PMID:21458145
Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the positive predictive value (PPV) in ultrasonographically (US)-detected breast lesions of BI-RADS category 4a, 4b and 4c and to find how various clinical factors influenced the PPV of category 4. A total of 2142 women with 2430 breast lesions diagnosed on US as BI-RADS category 4 and underwent biopsy were included. Among them, 452 (18.6%) were pathologically confirmed as malignancy. PPV of each US BI-RADS subcategory was 7.6% (149/1963) for category 4a, 37.8% (68/180) for category 4b and 81.9% (235/287) for category 4c. Several clinical factors were more significantly seen in malignancy of category 4a and 4b, whereas none of the factors showed significance in category 4c. Subcategorization of category 4 is a feasible method in predicting malignancy in which patients' age, lack of multiplicity and symptoms affected the PPV of category 4 lesions.

摘要

本研究旨在评估超声(US)检测到的 BI-RADS 类别 4a、4b 和 4c 中乳腺病变的阳性预测值(PPV),并探讨各种临床因素如何影响 4 类病变的 PPV。共纳入 2142 名女性,2430 个乳腺病变经 US 诊断为 BI-RADS 4 类,并进行了活检。其中,452 例(18.6%)病理证实为恶性。US BI-RADS 亚类中,4a 类的 PPV 为 7.6%(149/1963),4b 类为 37.8%(68/180),4c 类为 81.9%(235/287)。在 4a 类和 4b 类的恶性病变中,几个临床因素更为显著,而在 4c 类中,没有一个因素具有显著意义。4 类的亚分类是一种预测恶性病变的可行方法,其中患者年龄、缺乏多发性和症状影响 4 类病变的 PPV。

相似文献

1
Subcategorization of ultrasonographic BI-RADS category 4: positive predictive value and clinical factors affecting it.超声 BI-RADS 4 类的再分类:阳性预测值及其影响因素。
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2011 May;37(5):693-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2011.02.009. Epub 2011 Mar 31.
2
Subcategorization of Ultrasonographic BI-RADS Category 4: Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy in Diagnosing Breast Lesions and Influence of Clinical Factors on Positive Predictive Value.超声 BI-RADS 分类 4 级的再分类:诊断乳腺病变的诊断准确性评估及临床因素对阳性预测值的影响。
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2019 May;45(5):1253-1258. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2018.12.008. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
3
Value of the US BI-RADS final assessment following mastectomy: BI-RADS 4 and 5 lesions.乳房切除术后美国放射学会(ACR)乳腺影像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)最终评估的价值:BI-RADS 4和5类病变
Acta Radiol. 2012 Apr 1;53(3):255-60. doi: 10.1258/ar.2011.110597. Epub 2012 Feb 1.
4
Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy and Efficiency of Categories 4 and 5 of the Second Edition of the BI-RADS Ultrasound Lexicon in Diagnosing Breast Lesions.乳腺影像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)超声术语词典第二版4类和5类在诊断乳腺病变中的诊断准确性和效率评估
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2016 Sep;42(9):2065-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2016.04.020. Epub 2016 Jun 2.
5
Influence of age on PPV of sonographic BI-RADS categories 3, 4, and 5.年龄对超声 BI-RADS 类别 3、4 和 5 的 PPV 的影响。
Ultraschall Med. 2011 Jan;32 Suppl 1:S8-13. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1245384. Epub 2010 Jul 5.
6
Simple rules for ultrasonographic subcategorization of BI-RADS®-US 4 breast masses.BI-RADS®-US 4 类乳腺肿块的超声亚型分类简单规则。
Eur J Radiol. 2013 Aug;82(8):1231-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.02.032. Epub 2013 Mar 27.
7
Prediction for Breast Cancer in BI-RADS Category 4 Lesion Categorized by Age and Breast Composition of Women in Songklanagarind Hospital.BI-RADS 4 类乳腺病变中年龄和乳腺组成对女性乳腺癌预测的研究。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2021 Feb 1;22(2):531-536. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2021.22.2.531.
8
Ultrasound positive predictive values by BI-RADS categories 3-5 for solid masses: An independent reader study.BI-RADS 类别 3-5 实性肿块的超声阳性预测值:独立读者研究。
Eur Radiol. 2017 Oct;27(10):4307-4315. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-4835-7. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
9
BI-RADS lexicon for US and mammography: interobserver variability and positive predictive value.用于超声和乳腺钼靶检查的BI-RADS词典:观察者间的变异性和阳性预测值。
Radiology. 2006 May;239(2):385-91. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2392042127. Epub 2006 Mar 28.
10
Role of BI-RADS Ultrasound Subcategories 4A to 4C in Predicting Breast Cancer.BI-RADS 超声分类 4A 至 4C 在预测乳腺癌中的作用。
Clin Breast Cancer. 2018 Aug;18(4):e507-e511. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2017.09.002. Epub 2017 Sep 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Multiview deep learning networks based on automated breast volume scanner images for identifying breast cancer in BI-RADS 4.基于自动乳腺容积扫描仪图像的多视图深度学习网络用于识别BI-RADS 4级乳腺癌。
Front Oncol. 2024 Sep 6;14:1399296. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1399296. eCollection 2024.
2
Breast Tomographic Ultrasound: The Spectrum from Current Dense Breast Cancer Screenings to Future Theranostic Treatments.乳腺断层超声:从当前致密型乳腺癌筛查到未来的治疗应用。
Tomography. 2024 Apr 15;10(4):554-573. doi: 10.3390/tomography10040044.
3
The Accuracy of Breast Cancer Diagnostic Tools.
乳腺癌诊断工具的准确性。
Cureus. 2024 Jan 7;16(1):e51776. doi: 10.7759/cureus.51776. eCollection 2024 Jan.
4
Can Short-term Follow-up with Ultrasound be Offered as an Acceptable Alternative to Immediate Biopsy or Surgery for Patients with First Ultrasound Diagnosis of BI-RADS 4A Lesions?对于首次超声诊断为 BI-RADS 4A 病变的患者,可否提供短期超声随访作为替代立即活检或手术的可接受选择?
World J Surg. 2023 Sep;47(9):2161-2168. doi: 10.1007/s00268-023-07037-x. Epub 2023 Apr 28.
5
Ultrasound-based deep learning in the establishment of a breast lesion risk stratification system: a multicenter study.基于超声的深度学习在建立乳腺病变风险分层系统中的应用:一项多中心研究
Eur Radiol. 2023 Apr;33(4):2954-2964. doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-09263-8. Epub 2022 Nov 23.
6
Downgrade BI-RADS 4A Patients Using Nomogram Based on Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Ultrasound, and Mammography.基于乳腺磁共振成像、超声和乳腺X线摄影的列线图对BI-RADS 4A级患者进行降级评估。
Front Oncol. 2022 Jan 27;12:807402. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.807402. eCollection 2022.
7
A Review of the Role of the S-Detect Computer-Aided Diagnostic Ultrasound System in the Evaluation of Benign and Malignant Breast and Thyroid Masses.S-Detect 计算机辅助诊断超声系统在评估乳腺和甲状腺良恶性肿块中的作用评价。
Med Sci Monit. 2021 Sep 23;27:e931957. doi: 10.12659/MSM.931957.
8
Prediction for Breast Cancer in BI-RADS Category 4 Lesion Categorized by Age and Breast Composition of Women in Songklanagarind Hospital.BI-RADS 4 类乳腺病变中年龄和乳腺组成对女性乳腺癌预测的研究。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2021 Feb 1;22(2):531-536. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2021.22.2.531.
9
Effect of a Deep Learning Framework-Based Computer-Aided Diagnosis System on the Diagnostic Performance of Radiologists in Differentiating between Malignant and Benign Masses on Breast Ultrasonography.深度学习框架辅助诊断系统对乳腺超声良恶性肿块鉴别诊断中放射科医生诊断性能的影响。
Korean J Radiol. 2019 May;20(5):749-758. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2018.0530.
10
[Radio-histological correlation of ACR4 microcalcifications in breast lesions: about 181 cases and literature review].[乳腺病变中ACR4微钙化的放射-组织学相关性:181例病例及文献综述]
Pan Afr Med J. 2018 Mar 2;29:140. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2018.29.140.13699. eCollection 2018.