Department of Partial Denture Prosthodontics, Nihon University School of Dentistry, Chiyoda-ku Tokyo, Japan.
J Prosthet Dent. 2011 Apr;105(4):266-71. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(11)60042-5.
Magnetic attachments are commonly used for overdentures. However, it can be difficult to identify and provide the same type and size of magnetic assembly and keeper if a repair becomes necessary. Therefore, the size and type may not match.
This study evaluated the retentive force and magnetic flux strength and leakage of magnetic attachments in different combinations of keepers and magnetic assemblies.
For 6 magnet-keeper combinations using 4 sizes of magnets (GIGAUSS D400, D600, D800, and D1000) (n=5), retentive force was measured 5 times at a crosshead speed of 5 mm/min in a universal testing machine. Magnetic flux strength was measured using a Hall Effect Gaussmeter. Data were statistically analyzed using a 1-way ANOVA, and between-group differences were analyzed with Tukey's HSD post hoc test (α=.05).
The mean retentive force of the same-size magnet-keeper combinations was 3.2 N for GIGAUSS D400 and 5.1 N for GIGAUSS D600, but was significantly reduced when using larger magnets (P<.05). Magnetic flux leakage was significantly lower for corresponding size combinations.
Size differences influence the retentive force and magnetic flux strength of magnetic attachments. Retentive force decreased due to the closed field structure becoming incomplete and due to magnetic field leakage.
磁性附着体常用于覆盖义齿。然而,如果需要进行修复,可能难以确定并提供相同类型和尺寸的磁性组件和固位体,因此尺寸和类型可能不匹配。
本研究评估了不同固位体和磁性组件组合的磁性附着体的固位力、磁通量强度和漏磁。
对于使用 4 种尺寸(GIGAUSS D400、D600、D800 和 D1000)的磁铁-固位体组合(n=5),在万能试验机上以 5mm/min 的十字头速度测量 5 次固位力。使用霍尔效应高斯计测量磁通量强度。使用单向方差分析对数据进行统计分析,并用 Tukey 的 HSD 事后检验分析组间差异(α=.05)。
相同尺寸的磁铁-固位体组合的平均固位力对于 GIGAUSS D400 为 3.2N,对于 GIGAUSS D600 为 5.1N,但使用较大的磁铁时显著降低(P<.05)。相应尺寸组合的漏磁明显较低。
尺寸差异会影响磁性附着体的固位力和磁通量强度。由于闭合磁场结构变得不完整以及磁场漏出,固位力会降低。