• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Association of socioeconomic status with mortality in type 1 diabetes: the Pittsburgh epidemiology of diabetes complications study.社会经济地位与 1 型糖尿病患者死亡率的相关性:匹兹堡糖尿病并发症流行病学研究。
Ann Epidemiol. 2011 May;21(5):367-73. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2011.02.011.
2
Associations between socioeconomic status and major complications in type 1 diabetes: the Pittsburgh epidemiology of diabetes complication (EDC) Study.1 型糖尿病主要并发症与社会经济地位的关系:匹兹堡糖尿病并发症流行病学(EDC)研究。
Ann Epidemiol. 2011 May;21(5):374-81. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2011.02.007.
3
A Contemporary Estimate of Total Mortality and Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Young Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: The Pittsburgh Epidemiology of Diabetes Complications Study.1型糖尿病青年成人全因死亡率和心血管疾病风险的当代评估:匹兹堡糖尿病并发症流行病学研究
Diabetes Care. 2016 Dec;39(12):2296-2303. doi: 10.2337/dc16-1162. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
4
Association Between Socioeconomic Status and Mortality, Cardiovascular Disease, and Cancer in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.社会经济地位与 2 型糖尿病患者的死亡率、心血管疾病和癌症的关系。
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Aug 1;176(8):1146-54. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.2940.
5
Cause-specific mortality trends in a large population-based cohort with long-standing childhood-onset type 1 diabetes.基于大型人群队列的长期儿童起病 1 型糖尿病患者的病因特异性死亡率趋势。
Diabetes. 2010 Dec;59(12):3216-22. doi: 10.2337/db10-0862. Epub 2010 Aug 25.
6
Socioeconomic Status, Modifiable Factors, and Risk of Microvascular Complications in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes: A Cohort Study From the UK Biobank.社会经济地位、可改变因素与2型糖尿病患者微血管并发症风险:一项来自英国生物银行的队列研究
J Diabetes. 2025 Apr;17(4):e70079. doi: 10.1111/1753-0407.70079.
7
The prediction of major outcomes of type 1 diabetes: a 12-year prospective evaluation of three separate definitions of the metabolic syndrome and their components and estimated glucose disposal rate: the Pittsburgh Epidemiology of Diabetes Complications Study experience.1型糖尿病主要结局的预测:对代谢综合征的三种不同定义及其组成部分以及估计的葡萄糖处置率进行的12年前瞻性评估:匹兹堡糖尿病并发症流行病学研究经验
Diabetes Care. 2007 May;30(5):1248-54. doi: 10.2337/dc06-2053. Epub 2007 Feb 15.
8
Impact of socioeconomic status on chronic control and complications of type 1 diabetes mellitus in users of glucose flash systems: a follow-up study.社会经济地位对使用葡萄糖闪烁系统的1型糖尿病患者慢性疾病控制及并发症的影响:一项随访研究
BMC Med. 2024 Jan 25;22(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03254-w.
9
Impact of parental socioeconomic status on excess mortality in a population-based cohort of subjects with childhood-onset type 1 diabetes.父母社会经济地位对儿童期起病 1 型糖尿病患者人群队列中超重死亡率的影响。
Diabetes Care. 2015 May;38(5):827-32. doi: 10.2337/dc14-1522. Epub 2015 Feb 20.
10
Mortality and acute complications in children and young adults diagnosed with Type 1 diabetes in Yorkshire, UK: a cohort study.英国约克郡 1 型糖尿病患儿和青年的死亡率和急性并发症:一项队列研究。
Diabet Med. 2018 Jan;35(1):112-120. doi: 10.1111/dme.13544.

引用本文的文献

1
Investigation of geographic disparities of diabetes-related hospitalizations in Florida using flexible spatial scan statistics: An ecological study.利用灵活空间扫描统计调查佛罗里达州糖尿病住院相关的地理差异:一项生态研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 4;19(6):e0298182. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298182. eCollection 2024.
2
Prediabetes prevalence and awareness by race, ethnicity, and educational attainment among U.S. adults.美国成年人中按种族、民族和受教育程度划分的糖尿病前期患病率和知晓率。
Front Public Health. 2023 Dec 18;11:1277657. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1277657. eCollection 2023.
3
Interventions to address global inequity in diabetes: international progress.解决全球糖尿病不平等问题的干预措施:国际进展。
Lancet. 2023 Jul 15;402(10397):250-264. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00914-5. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
4
Increase Access, Reduce Disparities: Recommendations for Modifying Medicaid CGM Coverage Eligibility Criteria.增加可及性,减少差距:修改医疗补助连续血糖监测(CGM)覆盖资格标准的建议。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024 Jul;18(4):974-987. doi: 10.1177/19322968221144052. Epub 2022 Dec 16.
5
Using Peer Power to Reduce Health Disparities: Implementation of a Diabetes Support Coach Program in Federally Qualified Health Centers.利用同伴力量减少健康差距:在联邦合格健康中心实施糖尿病支持教练项目
Diabetes Spectr. 2022 Summer;35(3):295-303. doi: 10.2337/dsi22-0004. Epub 2022 Aug 15.
6
Trends in Diabetes Mortality in Urban and Rural China, 1987-2019: A Joinpoint Regression Analysis.中国城乡糖尿病死亡率趋势,1987-2019:一个 Joinpoint 回归分析。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Jan 17;12:777654. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.777654. eCollection 2021.
7
Democratizing type 1 diabetes specialty care in the primary care setting to reduce health disparities: project extension for community healthcare outcomes (ECHO) T1D.将 1 型糖尿病专科护理在基层医疗环境中普及化,以减少健康差距:社区医疗保健结果(ECHO)T1D 项目扩展。
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2021 Jul;9(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2021-002262.
8
Barriers to Technology Use and Endocrinology Care for Underserved Communities With Type 1 Diabetes.服务不足的 1 型糖尿病社区在使用技术和接受内分泌学治疗方面的障碍。
Diabetes Care. 2021 Jul;44(7):1480-1490. doi: 10.2337/dc20-2753. Epub 2021 May 17.
9
Assessment of Selected Aspects of the Quality of Life of Children with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus in Poland.波兰 1 型糖尿病儿童生活质量的某些方面评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 22;18(4):2107. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18042107.
10
Heterogeneous long-term trajectories of glycaemic control in type 1 diabetes.1 型糖尿病患者血糖控制的异质长期轨迹。
Diabet Med. 2021 Aug;38(8):e14545. doi: 10.1111/dme.14545. Epub 2021 Mar 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Socioeconomic differences in mortality among diabetic people in Finland.芬兰糖尿病人死亡率的社会经济差异。
Scand J Public Health. 2010 Nov;38(7):691-8. doi: 10.1177/1403494810376427. Epub 2010 Jul 22.
2
Life-course socioeconomic position and incidence of coronary heart disease: the Framingham Offspring Study.生命历程中的社会经济地位与冠心病发病率:弗雷明汉后代研究
Am J Epidemiol. 2009 Apr 1;169(7):829-36. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwn403. Epub 2009 Jan 29.
3
Prolonged effect of intensive therapy on the risk of retinopathy complications in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus: 10 years after the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial.强化治疗对1型糖尿病患者视网膜病变并发症风险的长期影响:糖尿病控制与并发症试验10年后
Arch Ophthalmol. 2008 Dec;126(12):1707-15. doi: 10.1001/archopht.126.12.1707.
4
Cardiometabolic risk and educational level in adult patients with type 1 diabetes.1型糖尿病成年患者的心血管代谢风险与教育水平
Acta Diabetol. 2009 Jun;46(2):159-62. doi: 10.1007/s00592-008-0065-4. Epub 2008 Oct 9.
5
Assessment of risk factors of poor metabolic control in type 1 diabetic children assisted in a public hospital in Argentina.对阿根廷一家公立医院收治的1型糖尿病儿童代谢控制不佳的风险因素评估。
Pediatr Diabetes. 2008 Oct;9(5):480-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5448.2008.00388.x. Epub 2008 Aug 27.
6
Coronary heart disease among diabetic and nondiabetic people - socioeconomic differences in incidence, prognosis and mortality.糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者中的冠心病——发病率、预后和死亡率的社会经济差异
J Diabetes Complications. 2008 Jan-Feb;22(1):10-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2007.05.004.
7
The role of socioeconomic status, depression, quality of life, and glycemic control in type 1 diabetes mellitus.社会经济地位、抑郁、生活质量及血糖控制在1型糖尿病中的作用。
J Pediatr. 2006 Oct;149(4):526-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2006.05.039.
8
Metabolic memory in diabetes--focus on insulin.糖尿病中的代谢记忆——聚焦于胰岛素。
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2005 Mar-Apr;21(2):85-90. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.530.
9
Mortality and educational level among diabetic and non-diabetic population in the Turin Longitudinal Study: a 9-year follow-up.都灵纵向研究中糖尿病和非糖尿病人群的死亡率与教育水平:9年随访
Int J Epidemiol. 2004 Aug;33(4):864-71. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyh089. Epub 2004 May 6.
10
Cumulative social class and mortality from various causes of adult men.成年男性的累积社会阶层与各种死因导致的死亡率
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003 Sep;57(9):745-51. doi: 10.1136/jech.57.9.745.

社会经济地位与 1 型糖尿病患者死亡率的相关性:匹兹堡糖尿病并发症流行病学研究。

Association of socioeconomic status with mortality in type 1 diabetes: the Pittsburgh epidemiology of diabetes complications study.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.

出版信息

Ann Epidemiol. 2011 May;21(5):367-73. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2011.02.011.

DOI:10.1016/j.annepidem.2011.02.011
PMID:21458730
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3070912/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Socioeconomic status (SES) as a risk factor for mortality in type 1 diabetes (T1D) has not been adequately studied prospectively.

METHODS

Complete clinical and SES (income, education, occupation) data were available for 317 T1D participants in the Pittsburgh Epidemiology of Diabetes Complications Study within 4 years of age 28 (chosen to maximize income, education, and occupational potential, and to minimize the SES effect of advanced diabetes complications). Vital status was determined as of 1/1/2008.

RESULTS

Over a median 16 years of follow-up, 34 (10.7%) deaths occurred (standardized mortality ratios [SMRs] = 4.1, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.7-5.5). SMRs did not differ from the general population for those in the highest education and income groups, whereas in those with low SES, SMRs were increased. Mortality rates were three times lower for individuals with a college degree versus without a college degree (p = 0.004) and nearly four times lower for the highest income versus lower income groups (p = 0.04). In Cox models adjusting for diabetes duration and sex, education was the only SES measure predictive of mortality (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.0, 95% CI: 1.2-7.8), but lost significance after adjusting for HbA(1c), non-HDL cholesterol, hypertension, and microalbuminuria (HR = 2.1, 95% CI: 0.8-5.6).

CONCLUSIONS

The strong association of education with mortality in T1D is partially mediated by better glycemic, lipid, and blood pressure control.

摘要

目的

社会经济地位(SES)作为 1 型糖尿病(T1D)死亡的危险因素,尚未得到充分的前瞻性研究。

方法

匹兹堡糖尿病并发症流行病学研究(Pittsburgh Epidemiology of Diabetes Complications Study)中的 317 名 T1D 参与者在 28 岁之前(选择这一年龄以最大限度地提高收入、教育和职业潜力,并最大限度地减少先进的糖尿病并发症对 SES 的影响),有完整的临床和 SES(收入、教育、职业)数据。截至 2008 年 1 月 1 日,确定了生存状态。

结果

在中位数为 16 年的随访期间,发生了 34 例(10.7%)死亡(标准化死亡率比 [SMR] = 4.1,95%置信区间 [CI]:2.7-5.5)。对于那些处于最高教育和收入群体的人来说,SMR 与一般人群没有差异,而对于 SES 较低的人来说,SMR 则增加。与没有大学学历的人相比,具有大学学历的个体的死亡率低三倍(p = 0.004),与收入较低的人相比,收入最高的人死亡率低四倍(p = 0.04)。在调整糖尿病病程和性别的 Cox 模型中,教育是唯一可预测死亡率的 SES 指标(危险比 [HR] = 3.0,95%CI:1.2-7.8),但在调整 HbA(1c)、非高密度脂蛋白胆固醇、高血压和微量白蛋白尿后,其意义丧失(HR = 2.1,95%CI:0.8-5.6)。

结论

教育与 T1D 死亡率之间的强关联部分是通过更好的血糖、血脂和血压控制来介导的。