Suppr超能文献

社会经济地位与 1 型糖尿病患者死亡率的相关性:匹兹堡糖尿病并发症流行病学研究。

Association of socioeconomic status with mortality in type 1 diabetes: the Pittsburgh epidemiology of diabetes complications study.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.

出版信息

Ann Epidemiol. 2011 May;21(5):367-73. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2011.02.011.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Socioeconomic status (SES) as a risk factor for mortality in type 1 diabetes (T1D) has not been adequately studied prospectively.

METHODS

Complete clinical and SES (income, education, occupation) data were available for 317 T1D participants in the Pittsburgh Epidemiology of Diabetes Complications Study within 4 years of age 28 (chosen to maximize income, education, and occupational potential, and to minimize the SES effect of advanced diabetes complications). Vital status was determined as of 1/1/2008.

RESULTS

Over a median 16 years of follow-up, 34 (10.7%) deaths occurred (standardized mortality ratios [SMRs] = 4.1, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.7-5.5). SMRs did not differ from the general population for those in the highest education and income groups, whereas in those with low SES, SMRs were increased. Mortality rates were three times lower for individuals with a college degree versus without a college degree (p = 0.004) and nearly four times lower for the highest income versus lower income groups (p = 0.04). In Cox models adjusting for diabetes duration and sex, education was the only SES measure predictive of mortality (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.0, 95% CI: 1.2-7.8), but lost significance after adjusting for HbA(1c), non-HDL cholesterol, hypertension, and microalbuminuria (HR = 2.1, 95% CI: 0.8-5.6).

CONCLUSIONS

The strong association of education with mortality in T1D is partially mediated by better glycemic, lipid, and blood pressure control.

摘要

目的

社会经济地位(SES)作为 1 型糖尿病(T1D)死亡的危险因素,尚未得到充分的前瞻性研究。

方法

匹兹堡糖尿病并发症流行病学研究(Pittsburgh Epidemiology of Diabetes Complications Study)中的 317 名 T1D 参与者在 28 岁之前(选择这一年龄以最大限度地提高收入、教育和职业潜力,并最大限度地减少先进的糖尿病并发症对 SES 的影响),有完整的临床和 SES(收入、教育、职业)数据。截至 2008 年 1 月 1 日,确定了生存状态。

结果

在中位数为 16 年的随访期间,发生了 34 例(10.7%)死亡(标准化死亡率比 [SMR] = 4.1,95%置信区间 [CI]:2.7-5.5)。对于那些处于最高教育和收入群体的人来说,SMR 与一般人群没有差异,而对于 SES 较低的人来说,SMR 则增加。与没有大学学历的人相比,具有大学学历的个体的死亡率低三倍(p = 0.004),与收入较低的人相比,收入最高的人死亡率低四倍(p = 0.04)。在调整糖尿病病程和性别的 Cox 模型中,教育是唯一可预测死亡率的 SES 指标(危险比 [HR] = 3.0,95%CI:1.2-7.8),但在调整 HbA(1c)、非高密度脂蛋白胆固醇、高血压和微量白蛋白尿后,其意义丧失(HR = 2.1,95%CI:0.8-5.6)。

结论

教育与 T1D 死亡率之间的强关联部分是通过更好的血糖、血脂和血压控制来介导的。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Socioeconomic differences in mortality among diabetic people in Finland.芬兰糖尿病人死亡率的社会经济差异。
Scand J Public Health. 2010 Nov;38(7):691-8. doi: 10.1177/1403494810376427. Epub 2010 Jul 22.
8
Metabolic memory in diabetes--focus on insulin.糖尿病中的代谢记忆——聚焦于胰岛素。
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2005 Mar-Apr;21(2):85-90. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.530.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验