Department of Clinical Oral Physiology, School of Dentistry, Aarhus University, and Center for Functionally Integrative Neuroscience, MindLab, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.
J Dent Res. 2011 Jul;90(7):918-22. doi: 10.1177/0022034511402997. Epub 2011 Apr 1.
The aims of this study were to compare test-retest variability and accuracy measures between (1) manual palpation and a novel palpometer and (2) different force levels. Sixteen clinicians were instructed to target 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 kg on a force meter using manual palpation and the new palpometer (adjustable spring-coil with a small pin touching the examiner's hand when the correct pressure is reached). In all experiments, 10 consecutive measures of the force levels were recorded. The coefficient of variation (CV), actual force levels, and relative differences between target level and actual force level were compared between experiments and target levels. All outcome parameters had significantly lower values for the new palpometer than for manual palpation in a force-dependent manner (p<0.004). CVs and actual force levels were significantly different between all target levels (p<0.004). The new palpometer had low test-retest variability and provides a more accurate pressure stimulus than manual palpation.
本研究的目的是比较(1)手动触诊和新型触诊器以及(2)不同力度水平之间的复测变异性和准确性测量。16 名临床医生被指示使用手动触诊和新型触诊器(带小针的可调节弹簧线圈,当达到正确的压力时,小针会接触到检查者的手)在力度计上定位 0.5、1.0 和 2.0 公斤。在所有实验中,记录了 10 次连续的力度测量值。在力度依赖性的方式下,新型触诊器的变异系数(CV)、实际力度水平和目标力度水平与实际力度水平之间的相对差异均显著低于手动触诊(p<0.004)。所有目标水平之间的 CVs 和实际力度水平均存在显著差异(p<0.004)。新型触诊器具有较低的复测变异性,并且比手动触诊提供更准确的压力刺激。