Chaves Thaís Cristina, Nagamine Harumi Martins, de Sousa Letícia Mêlo, de Oliveira Anamaria Siriani, Grossi Débora Bevilaqua
Department of Biomechanics, Medicine and Rehabilitation of the Locomotor Apparatus, Ribeirão Preto School of Medicine, University of São Paulo-USP, Câmpus Universitário, CEP: 14049-900 Ribeirão Preto (SP) Brasil.
Man Ther. 2010 Oct;15(5):508-12. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2010.03.010. Epub 2010 Apr 28.
The aim of this study was to compare the intra- and inter-rater reliability of pressure pain threshold (PPT) and manual palpation (MP) of orofacial structures in symptomatic and symptom-free children for temporomandibular disorders (TMD). Fourteen children reporting pain in masticatory muscles or the temporomandibular joint and 16 symptom-free children were randomly assessed on three different occasions: by rater-1 in the first and third session and by rater-2 in the second session. The trained raters applied algometry and MP as recommended by the Research Diagnostic Criteria for TMD. Intraclass correlation coefficients and the Kappa statistic were used to assess the levels of reliability of PPT and MP, respectively. Excellent intra- and inter-rater reliability levels were observed for PPT values at most of the examined sites for symptom-free children and excellent and moderate reliability levels for children reporting pain. For MP, moderate and poor intra-rater and inter-rater reliability levels were observed for most sites in both groups. Algometry showed higher reliability levels for both groups of children and is recommended for pain assessment in children in association with MP.
本研究的目的是比较有症状和无症状儿童颞下颌关节紊乱病(TMD)的口面部结构压痛阈(PPT)和手法触诊(MP)在评估者内和评估者间的可靠性。14名报告咀嚼肌或颞下颌关节疼痛的儿童和16名无症状儿童在三个不同时间点接受随机评估:第一次和第三次评估由评估者1进行,第二次评估由评估者2进行。训练有素的评估者按照TMD研究诊断标准的建议应用压力测定法和手法触诊。组内相关系数和Kappa统计量分别用于评估PPT和MP的可靠性水平。在大多数检查部位,无症状儿童的PPT值在评估者内和评估者间具有出色的可靠性水平,而报告疼痛的儿童则具有出色和中等的可靠性水平。对于MP,两组中大多数部位在评估者内和评估者间的可靠性水平为中等和较差。压力测定法在两组儿童中均显示出较高的可靠性水平,建议在儿童疼痛评估中与手法触诊联合使用。