• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新世纪澳大利亚民众对酒类政策的看法。

Mapping Australian public opinion on alcohol policies in the new millennium.

机构信息

AER Centre for Alcohol Policy Research, Turning Point Alcohol and Drug Centre, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

Drug Alcohol Rev. 2009 May;28(3):263-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-3362.2009.00027.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1465-3362.2009.00027.x
PMID:21462409
Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS

Drawing on 16 items in the 2004 National Drug Strategy Household Survey (NDSHS), the paper explores the degree to which Australian public opinion towards different alcohol policies cohere or diverge, and the social location of support for and resistance to more restrictive alcohol controls. Variations in support for particular policies by demographic groups, across states and territories and among those with difference drinking patterns are explored. The extent and direction in which attitudes have changed over time was determined.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Sixteen items from the 2004 NDSHS were subjected to factor analysis. Both a single factor and a four-factor solution were derived and became the dependent variables for state/territory comparisons and multiple regression analyses determining the predictive power of respondents demographics and drinking behaviour. Trends over time in alcohol policy attitudes used the 1993, 1995, 1998, 2001 and 2004 NDSHS.

RESULTS

More severe penalties against drink driving and stricter laws against serving customers who were drunk had the strongest support while policies that controlled accessibility to alcohol such as reducing trading hours received the least support. For all policies support was greater among females, older respondents and those drinking less. The individual's drinking pattern was as strong, and in some cases a stronger predictor of support than gender and age.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

While support for the majority of the alcohol policies decreased over the 11-year period since 1993, attitudes may be influenced and changed over a shorter period of time.

摘要

引言和目的

本文利用 2004 年全国毒品策略家庭调查(NDSHS)中的 16 项指标,探讨了澳大利亚公众对不同酒精政策的看法是否一致或存在分歧,以及对更严格的酒精控制措施的支持和抵制的社会定位。本文还探讨了不同年龄、性别、饮酒模式的人群对特定政策的支持程度的变化情况。本文还确定了随着时间的推移,态度变化的程度和方向。

设计和方法

对 2004 年 NDSHS 的 16 项指标进行了因子分析。得出了一个单一因素和四个因素的解决方案,这两个解决方案成为了州/领地比较和多元回归分析的因变量,这些分析确定了受访者的人口统计学和饮酒行为的预测能力。使用 1993 年、1995 年、1998 年、2001 年和 2004 年 NDSHS 来研究随着时间的推移,酒精政策态度的趋势。

结果

对酒后驾车者实施更严厉的处罚和对向醉酒顾客提供服务实施更严格的法律的支持最强,而控制酒精供应渠道(如减少营业时间)的政策则得到的支持最少。在所有政策中,女性、年龄较大的受访者和饮酒较少的受访者的支持率更高。个人的饮酒模式与性别和年龄一样,甚至在某些情况下,是支持的更强预测因素。

讨论和结论

尽管自 1993 年以来的 11 年期间,大多数酒精政策的支持率有所下降,但态度可能在更短的时间内受到影响和改变。

相似文献

1
Mapping Australian public opinion on alcohol policies in the new millennium.新世纪澳大利亚民众对酒类政策的看法。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2009 May;28(3):263-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-3362.2009.00027.x.
2
The impact of high profile restrictions on support for alcohol control policies.高知名度限制对支持酒精控制政策的影响。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2019 May;38(4):399-405. doi: 10.1111/dar.12933. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
3
Changes in Australian attitudes to alcohol policy: 1995-2010.1995年至2010年澳大利亚人对酒精政策态度的变化。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2014 May;33(3):227-34. doi: 10.1111/dar.12106. Epub 2013 Dec 23.
4
Public support for alcohol policies associated with knowledge of cancer risk.公众对与癌症风险认知相关的酒精政策的支持。
Int J Drug Policy. 2015 Apr;26(4):371-9. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2014.08.006. Epub 2014 Aug 21.
5
Shifts in the Australian public's opinions towards alcohol policies: 2004-2019.澳大利亚公众对酒精政策态度的转变:2004-2019 年。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2023 Nov;42(7):1785-1795. doi: 10.1111/dar.13727. Epub 2023 Jul 31.
6
Experience of harm from others' drinking and support for stricter alcohol policies: Analysis of the Australian National Drug Strategy Household Survey.他人饮酒致害经历和对更严格酒政策的支持:澳大利亚国家毒品策略家庭调查分析。
Int J Drug Policy. 2017 Jul;45:25-32. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.05.002. Epub 2017 May 30.
7
Adolescents' alcohol use and strength of policy relating to youth access, trading hours and driving under the influence: findings from Australia.青少年饮酒行为与青少年获取酒途径、营业时间和酒后驾车相关政策的力度:来自澳大利亚的研究结果。
Addiction. 2018 Jun;113(6):1030-1042. doi: 10.1111/add.14164. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
8
Public attitudes towards alcohol control policies in Scotland and England: Results from a mixed-methods study.公众对苏格兰和英格兰酒精控制政策的态度:一项混合方法研究的结果。
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Mar;177:177-189. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.01.037. Epub 2017 Jan 25.
9
The ebb and flow of attitudes and policies on alcohol in Ireland 2002-2010.2002年至2010年爱尔兰关于酒精的态度和政策的起伏变化。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2014 May;33(3):235-41. doi: 10.1111/dar.12129. Epub 2014 Mar 17.
10
What did you drink yesterday? Public health relevance of a recent recall method used in the 2004 Australian National Drug Strategy Household Survey.你昨天喝了什么?2004年澳大利亚国家药物战略家庭调查中使用的一种近期召回方法的公共卫生相关性。
Addiction. 2008 Jun;103(6):919-28. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02219.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding the associations between eHealth activities and support for alcohol restrictions among drinkers-the roles of alcohol-related health risk awareness and self-efficacy.了解电子健康活动与饮酒者对酒精限制支持之间的关联——与酒精相关的健康风险意识和自我效能的作用。
Digit Health. 2025 Sep 11;11:20552076251376287. doi: 10.1177/20552076251376287. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Changing public perceptions of alcohol, alcohol harms and alcohol policies: A multi-methods study to develop novel framing approaches.改变公众对酒精、酒精危害及酒精政策的认知:一项旨在开发新型框架构建方法的多方法研究。
Addiction. 2025 Apr;120(4):655-668. doi: 10.1111/add.16743. Epub 2024 Dec 23.
3
Support for evidence-based alcohol policy in Ireland: results from a representative household survey.
爱尔兰支持基于证据的酒精政策:一项代表性家庭调查的结果。
Eur J Public Health. 2023 Apr 1;33(2):323-330. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckad031.
4
Acceptability of policies to reduce consumption of red and processed meat: A population-based survey experiment.减少红肉和加工肉类消费政策的可接受性:一项基于人群的调查实验。
J Environ Psychol. 2022 Jun;81:101817. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101817.
5
Public opinion and experiences of crime two and five years following the implementation of a targeted regulation of licensed premises in Newcastle, Australia.在澳大利亚纽卡斯尔实施有针对性的持牌场所监管措施两年和五年后,公众对犯罪的看法和经历。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2021 Mar;40(3):489-498. doi: 10.1111/dar.13207. Epub 2020 Nov 20.
6
Adolescents' Alcohol Use in and Attitudes towards Alcohol Use and Prevention Policies.青少年的饮酒行为及对饮酒的态度和预防政策。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 30;17(11):3885. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17113885.
7
Levels of support for the licensing of tobacco retailers in Australia: findings from the National Drug Strategy Household Survey 2004-2016.澳大利亚烟草零售商许可证制度的支持程度:2004-2016 年全国药物策略家庭调查的结果。
BMC Public Health. 2020 May 24;20(1):773. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08920-1.
8
Baseline Assessment of Alcohol-Related Knowledge of and Support for Alcohol Warning Labels Among Alcohol Consumers in Northern Canada and Associations With Key Sociodemographic Characteristics.加拿大北部地区酒精消费者对酒精警示标签的相关知识和支持情况的基线评估及其与关键社会人口学特征的关联。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2020 Mar;81(2):238-248. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2020.81.238.
9
Mapping and comparing French people's positions regarding restrictive control policies: a pilot study.法国民众对限制性管制政策立场的绘图与比较:一项试点研究。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2020 Mar 19;15(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s13011-020-00267-5.
10
Improving Knowledge that Alcohol Can Cause Cancer is Associated with Consumer Support for Alcohol Policies: Findings from a Real-World Alcohol Labelling Study.提高对酒精致癌的认识与消费者对酒精政策的支持有关:来自真实世界酒精标签研究的发现。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jan 7;17(2):398. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17020398.