• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

1995年至2010年澳大利亚人对酒精政策态度的变化。

Changes in Australian attitudes to alcohol policy: 1995-2010.

作者信息

Callinan Sarah, Room Robin, Livingston Michael

机构信息

Centre for Alcohol Policy Research, Turning Point, Melbourne, Australia; Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

Drug Alcohol Rev. 2014 May;33(3):227-34. doi: 10.1111/dar.12106. Epub 2013 Dec 23.

DOI:10.1111/dar.12106
PMID:24372933
Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS

In 2009 Wilkinson and colleagues reported a downward trend in support for alcohol policy restrictions in Australia between 1995 and 2004. The aim of the current study is to examine more recent data on policy support in Australia, specifically for policies covering alcohol availability up to 2010, and to examine specific demographic shifts in support.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Data was taken from the National Drug Strategy Household Surveys from 1995, 1998, 2001, 2004, 2007 and 2010 (n = 80,846), primarily responses to attitude items on policy restriction and demographic questions. The effects of age, sex, drinking patterns and income over time on three items addressing restriction of alcohol availability were assessed using a factorial analysis of variance.

RESULTS

Although availability items are among the less popular policy restrictions put forward in the National Drug Strategy Household Surveys, 2004 actually represented a turning point in the decrease in popularity, with an increase in support since then. Though some groups show consistently higher rates of support than others for policy restrictions, the rate of change in support was fairly uniform across demographic and drinking groups.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

Despite the lack of an obvious catalyst, there has been an increase in support for alcohol policy restriction as it relates to general availability and accessibility since 2004. Furthermore, this increase does not appear to be a reflection of a change in a specific group of people, but appears to be occurring across the Australian population.

摘要

引言与目的

2009年,威尔金森及其同事报告称,1995年至2004年间澳大利亚对酒精政策限制的支持呈下降趋势。本研究的目的是检验澳大利亚政策支持方面的最新数据,特别是截至2010年涵盖酒精可及性的政策,并研究支持方面的特定人口结构变化。

设计与方法

数据取自1995年、1998年、2001年、2004年、2007年和2010年的《国家毒品战略家庭调查》(n = 80,846),主要是对政策限制态度项目和人口问题的回答。使用方差分析评估年龄、性别、饮酒模式和收入随时间对三项关于限制酒精可及性项目的影响。

结果

尽管在《国家毒品战略家庭调查》中提出的政策限制中,可及性项目不太受欢迎,但2004年实际上是受欢迎程度下降的转折点,此后支持率有所上升。尽管一些群体对政策限制的支持率始终高于其他群体,但不同人口和饮酒群体的支持率变化相当一致。

讨论与结论

尽管缺乏明显的催化剂,但自2004年以来,与一般可及性和可得性相关的酒精政策限制的支持率有所上升。此外,这种上升似乎并非特定人群变化的反映,而是在澳大利亚全体人口中出现的。

相似文献

1
Changes in Australian attitudes to alcohol policy: 1995-2010.1995年至2010年澳大利亚人对酒精政策态度的变化。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2014 May;33(3):227-34. doi: 10.1111/dar.12106. Epub 2013 Dec 23.
2
Shifts in the Australian public's opinions towards alcohol policies: 2004-2019.澳大利亚公众对酒精政策态度的转变:2004-2019 年。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2023 Nov;42(7):1785-1795. doi: 10.1111/dar.13727. Epub 2023 Jul 31.
3
Long-term trends in alcohol policy attitudes in Norway.挪威酒精政策态度的长期趋势。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2014 May;33(3):220-6. doi: 10.1111/dar.12098. Epub 2013 Dec 12.
4
The ebb and flow of attitudes and policies on alcohol in Ireland 2002-2010.2002年至2010年爱尔兰关于酒精的态度和政策的起伏变化。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2014 May;33(3):235-41. doi: 10.1111/dar.12129. Epub 2014 Mar 17.
5
Mapping Australian public opinion on alcohol policies in the new millennium.新世纪澳大利亚民众对酒类政策的看法。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2009 May;28(3):263-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-3362.2009.00027.x.
6
The impact of high profile restrictions on support for alcohol control policies.高知名度限制对支持酒精控制政策的影响。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2019 May;38(4):399-405. doi: 10.1111/dar.12933. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
7
Changes in alcohol policies and public opinions in Finland 2003-2013.2003 - 2013年芬兰酒精政策与公众舆论的变化
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2014 May;33(3):242-8. doi: 10.1111/dar.12128. Epub 2014 Mar 17.
8
Trends in public opinion on alcohol issues during a period of increasing access to alcohol: Ontario, Canada, 1996-2011.在酒精获取日益容易的时期,公众对酒精问题的舆论趋势:加拿大安大略省,1996 - 2011年
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2014 May;33(3):249-58. doi: 10.1111/dar.12130.
9
Experience of harm from others' drinking and support for stricter alcohol policies: Analysis of the Australian National Drug Strategy Household Survey.他人饮酒致害经历和对更严格酒政策的支持:澳大利亚国家毒品策略家庭调查分析。
Int J Drug Policy. 2017 Jul;45:25-32. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.05.002. Epub 2017 May 30.
10
Differential perceptions of alcohol policy effectiveness.对酒精政策有效性的不同看法。
J Public Health Policy. 1993 Winter;14(4):413-36.

引用本文的文献

1
Changing public perceptions of alcohol, alcohol harms and alcohol policies: A multi-methods study to develop novel framing approaches.改变公众对酒精、酒精危害及酒精政策的认知:一项旨在开发新型框架构建方法的多方法研究。
Addiction. 2025 Apr;120(4):655-668. doi: 10.1111/add.16743. Epub 2024 Dec 23.
2
Selling World Health Organization's Alcohol "Best Buys" and Other Recommended Interventions in an Urban Chinese Population: Public Acceptability of Alcohol Harms Reduction Strategies in Hong Kong.在城市华人中推销世界卫生组织的“最佳购买”酒类和其他推荐干预措施:香港公众对减少酒精危害策略的接受程度。
Front Public Health. 2022 Apr 21;10:855416. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.855416. eCollection 2022.
3
Measuring public opinion and acceptability of prevention policies: an integrative review and narrative synthesis of methods.
测量公众意见和预防政策的可接受性:方法的综合评价和叙述性综合。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 Mar 4;20(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00829-y.
4
Changes in Australian community perceptions of non-communicable disease prevention: a greater role for government?澳大利亚社区对非传染性疾病预防认知的变化:政府扮演更重要的角色?
BMC Public Health. 2021 Nov 15;21(1):2094. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12159-9.
5
Declining drinking among adolescents: Are we seeing a denormalisation of drinking and a normalisation of non-drinking?青少年饮酒量下降:我们是否看到饮酒的去正常化和非饮酒的正常化?
Addiction. 2022 May;117(5):1204-1212. doi: 10.1111/add.15611. Epub 2021 Jul 14.
6
Interested constituents: identifying groups to mobilize in community organizing efforts to strengthen alcohol control policies.感兴趣的利益相关者:在社区组织努力中确定可以动员的群体,以加强酒精控制政策。
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2021 May 4;47(3):393-401. doi: 10.1080/00952990.2020.1870690. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
7
Support for Alcohol Policies in Marginalized Populations.支持边缘人群的酒精政策。
Alcohol Alcohol. 2021 Jun 29;56(4):500-509. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agaa130.
8
Public opinion and experiences of crime two and five years following the implementation of a targeted regulation of licensed premises in Newcastle, Australia.在澳大利亚纽卡斯尔实施有针对性的持牌场所监管措施两年和五年后,公众对犯罪的看法和经历。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2021 Mar;40(3):489-498. doi: 10.1111/dar.13207. Epub 2020 Nov 20.
9
The gendered relationship with drunkenness among different generations in Mediterranean and Nordic countries.地中海和北欧国家不同代人之间与醉酒的性别化关系。
Nordisk Alkohol Nark. 2020 Apr;37(2):172-189. doi: 10.1177/1455072520904651. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
10
Relationship between Alcohol Purchasing Time and Alcohol Use Disorder in South Korea.韩国酒精购买时间与酒精使用障碍之间的关系。
Osong Public Health Res Perspect. 2017 Dec;8(6):405-414. doi: 10.24171/j.phrp.2017.8.6.08. Epub 2017 Dec 31.