• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高知名度限制对支持酒精控制政策的影响。

The impact of high profile restrictions on support for alcohol control policies.

机构信息

Centre for Alcohol Policy Research, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.

Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Drug Alcohol Rev. 2019 May;38(4):399-405. doi: 10.1111/dar.12933. Epub 2019 Apr 30.

DOI:10.1111/dar.12933
PMID:31037792
Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS

Public support for restrictions on late night trading of licensed venues increased substantially between 2001 and 2013, a period with very few policy interventions in Australia. In early 2014 a set of high profile restrictions were introduced in Sydney, New South Wales. In this study, we examine whether these 2014 policy interventions affected public support for late trading restrictions.

DESIGN AND METHODS

We use data from the National Drug Strategy Household Survey, focussing especially on the 2013 (n = 23 521) and 2016 (n = 23 425) waves. A series of regression models with interaction terms between socio-demographic variable and year were used to examine how trends in support for late trading policies varied between different population groups.

RESULTS

Support for late trading restrictions fell substantially between 2013 and 2016-from 2.58 to 2.35 on a 0-4 point scale. In particular, support fell more in New South Wales than in other jurisdictions. Among New South Wales residents, support fell more for middle-aged and older respondents and more for drinkers than non-drinkers.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Support for late trading restrictions fell sharply, especially among those affected in New South Wales. Advocates for public health-oriented alcohol policy restrictions need to pay attention to public support in the aftermath of policy 'wins'.

摘要

引言和目的

2001 年至 2013 年间,公众对限制持牌场所夜间交易的支持大幅增加,在此期间澳大利亚几乎没有出台任何政策干预措施。2014 年初,新南威尔士州悉尼出台了一系列备受瞩目的限制措施。在这项研究中,我们研究了这些 2014 年的政策干预措施是否影响了公众对夜间交易限制的支持。

设计和方法

我们使用国家毒品策略家庭调查的数据,特别关注 2013 年(n=23521)和 2016 年(n=23425)的两个年度。使用一系列带有社会人口统计学变量与年度之间交互项的回归模型,研究了对夜间交易政策的支持趋势在不同人群之间的变化。

结果

2013 年至 2016 年间,对夜间交易限制的支持大幅下降——从 0-4 分制的 2.58 降至 2.35。特别是,新南威尔士州的支持率下降幅度大于其他司法管辖区。在新南威尔士州的居民中,中年和老年受访者以及饮酒者的支持率下降幅度大于非饮酒者。

讨论和结论

对夜间交易限制的支持急剧下降,特别是在新南威尔士州受影响的人群中。以公共卫生为导向的酒精政策限制的倡导者需要关注政策“胜利”后的公众支持。

相似文献

1
The impact of high profile restrictions on support for alcohol control policies.高知名度限制对支持酒精控制政策的影响。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2019 May;38(4):399-405. doi: 10.1111/dar.12933. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
2
Impacts of changes to trading hours of liquor licences on alcohol-related harm: a systematic review 2005-2015.酒类许可证营业时间变更对与酒精相关危害的影响:2005 - 2015年系统评价
Public Health Res Pract. 2016 Sep 30;26(4):2641644. doi: 10.17061/phrp2641644.
3
Mapping Australian public opinion on alcohol policies in the new millennium.新世纪澳大利亚民众对酒类政策的看法。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2009 May;28(3):263-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-3362.2009.00027.x.
4
Public support for alcohol policies associated with knowledge of cancer risk.公众对与癌症风险认知相关的酒精政策的支持。
Int J Drug Policy. 2015 Apr;26(4):371-9. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2014.08.006. Epub 2014 Aug 21.
5
Support for alcohol policies from drinkers in the City of Tshwane, South Africa: Data from the International Alcohol Control study.南非茨瓦内市饮酒者对酒精政策的支持:来自国际酒精控制研究的数据。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2018 Apr;37 Suppl 1(Suppl Suppl 1):S210-S217. doi: 10.1111/dar.12554. Epub 2017 May 10.
6
Changes in Australian attitudes to alcohol policy: 1995-2010.1995年至2010年澳大利亚人对酒精政策态度的变化。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2014 May;33(3):227-34. doi: 10.1111/dar.12106. Epub 2013 Dec 23.
7
Impacts of licensed premises trading hour policies on alcohol-related harms.持牌场所营业时间政策对与酒精相关的危害的影响。
Addiction. 2018 Jul;113(7):1244-1251. doi: 10.1111/add.14178. Epub 2018 Mar 2.
8
An overlooked effect: domestic violence and alcohol policies in the night-time economy.被忽视的影响:夜间经济中的家庭暴力和酒精政策。
Addiction. 2023 Aug;118(8):1471-1481. doi: 10.1111/add.16192. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
9
Shifts in the Australian public's opinions towards alcohol policies: 2004-2019.澳大利亚公众对酒精政策态度的转变:2004-2019 年。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2023 Nov;42(7):1785-1795. doi: 10.1111/dar.13727. Epub 2023 Jul 31.
10
Adolescents' alcohol use and strength of policy relating to youth access, trading hours and driving under the influence: findings from Australia.青少年饮酒行为与青少年获取酒途径、营业时间和酒后驾车相关政策的力度:来自澳大利亚的研究结果。
Addiction. 2018 Jun;113(6):1030-1042. doi: 10.1111/add.14164. Epub 2018 Feb 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Measuring public opinion and acceptability of prevention policies: an integrative review and narrative synthesis of methods.测量公众意见和预防政策的可接受性:方法的综合评价和叙述性综合。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 Mar 4;20(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00829-y.
2
Changes in Australian community perceptions of non-communicable disease prevention: a greater role for government?澳大利亚社区对非传染性疾病预防认知的变化:政府扮演更重要的角色?
BMC Public Health. 2021 Nov 15;21(1):2094. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12159-9.