• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜绝育术中直接套管针穿刺与使用Verres针的比较。

Direct trocar insertion vs. Verres needle use for laparoscopic sterilization.

作者信息

Borgatta L, Gruss L, Barad D, Kaali S G

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York.

出版信息

J Reprod Med. 1990 Sep;35(9):891-4.

PMID:2146389
Abstract

A randomized, prospective trial was designed to compare direct trocar insertion with prior peritoneal insufflation with a Verres needle for laparoscopic tubal sterilization. Direct trocar insertion resulted in fewer instrument insertions (21.8% vs. 7.8%) and use of smaller volumes of CO2 (2.67 vs. 2.32 L). Direct trocar use resulted in a decrease in operating time from 9 minutes, 40 seconds in the needle group to 7 minutes, 30 seconds in the trocar group. Minor omental injuries occurred in a small percentage of each group, while serious complications occurred once in each group.

摘要

一项随机前瞻性试验旨在比较腹腔镜输卵管绝育术中直接套管针插入与先用Verres针进行腹腔充气后插入的效果。直接套管针插入减少了器械插入次数(21.8%对7.8%),并减少了二氧化碳使用量(2.67升对2.32升)。使用直接套管针使手术时间从针组的9分40秒减少到套管针组的7分30秒。每组均有一小部分出现轻微网膜损伤,每组各有1例出现严重并发症。

相似文献

1
Direct trocar insertion vs. Verres needle use for laparoscopic sterilization.腹腔镜绝育术中直接套管针穿刺与使用Verres针的比较。
J Reprod Med. 1990 Sep;35(9):891-4.
2
A randomized comparison of Verres needle and direct trocar insertion for laparoscopy.用于腹腔镜检查的Verres针与直接套管针插入术的随机对照比较。
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1993 Sep;177(3):259-62.
3
Direct insertion of the laparoscopic trocar after an earlier laparotomy.在先前剖腹手术后直接插入腹腔镜套管针。
J Reprod Med. 1988 Sep;33(9):739-40.
4
Development of a simplified laparoscopic sterilization technique.
J Reprod Med. 1984 Aug;29(8):586-8.
5
Access techniques: Veress needle--initial blind trocar insertion versus open laparoscopy with the Hasson trocar.接入技术:韦雷斯针——初始盲目套管针插入术与使用哈森套管针的开放式腹腔镜检查术
Endosc Surg Allied Technol. 1995 Feb;3(1):35-8.
6
Female sterilisation: a cohort controlled comparative study of ESSURE versus laparoscopic sterilisation.女性绝育术:ESSURE与腹腔镜绝育术的队列对照比较研究。
BJOG. 2005 Nov;112(11):1522-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00726.x.
7
Experience in 4500 cases of laparoscopic sterilization.
Int Surg. 1993 Jan-Mar;78(1):76-8.
8
Gastrointestinal complications of laparoscopy sterilization.
Obstet Gynecol. 1973 May;41(5):669-76.
9
Safe laparoscopic entry guided by Veress needle CO2 insufflation pressure.在Veress针二氧化碳气腹压力引导下安全的腹腔镜穿刺入路
J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2003 Aug;10(3):415-20.
10
Minilaparotomy recommended for most programs: simpler and safer than laparoscopic sterilization.大多数方案推荐采用小切口剖腹术:比腹腔镜绝育术更简单、更安全。
Int Fam Plann Dig. 1977 Sep;3(3):12.

引用本文的文献

1
An open comparative randomized prospective study: Direct trocar insertion vs Veress needle technique in laparoscopic surgeries.直接套管针插入法与 Veress 针技术在腹腔镜手术中的开放比较随机前瞻性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Oct 4;103(40):e39929. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000039929.
2
Comparison of three umbilical entry sites for intraperitoneal access by the direct trocar insertion technique: a randomized pilot study.直接套管针插入技术经脐入路建立腹膜腔通道的三种脐部穿刺点比较:一项随机试验研究
J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2024 Aug 29;25(3):116-123. doi: 10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2024.2023-6-11.
3
Major and minor complications in Veress needle (VN) and direct trocar insertion (DTI) for laparoscopic closed-entry techniques: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.
Veress 针(VN)和直接套管针插入(DTI)在腹腔镜封闭入路技术中的主要和次要并发症:更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Apr 17;408(1):152. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-02891-8.
4
Comparison Between Closed and Open Methods for Creating Pneumoperitoneum in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.腹腔镜胆囊切除术中建立气腹的闭合式与开放式方法比较
Cureus. 2023 Mar 10;15(3):e35991. doi: 10.7759/cureus.35991. eCollection 2023 Mar.
5
Laparoscopic entry techniques: Which should you prefer?腹腔镜入路技术:您应该选择哪种?
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2023 Mar;160(3):742-750. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.14412. Epub 2022 Sep 1.
6
Systematic review and meta-analysis of Veress needle entry versus direct trocar entry in gynecologic surgery.妇科手术中Veress针穿刺与直接套管针穿刺的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol. 2022 Jun 28;4(1):e000121. doi: 10.1136/bmjsit-2021-000121. eCollection 2022.
7
Randomized control trial on effectiveness and safety of direct trocar versus Veress needle entry techniques in obese women during diagnostic laparoscopy.肥胖女性诊断性腹腔镜检查中直接套管针与Veress针穿刺技术有效性和安全性的随机对照试验
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021 Sep;304(3):815-822. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05957-w. Epub 2021 Jan 8.
8
Laparoscopic entry techniques.腹腔镜进入技术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jan 18;1(1):CD006583. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006583.pub5.
9
A multicentric prospective study evaluating the safety and efficacy of Kii Fios First Entry Trocar in laparoscopic bariatric surgery.一项多中心前瞻性研究评估 Kii Fios First Entry Trocar 在腹腔镜减重手术中的安全性和有效性。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Nov;31(11):4680-4687. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5536-7. Epub 2017 Apr 7.
10
Trocar Injuries in Laparoscopy: Techniques, Tools, and Means for Prevention. A Systematic Review of the Literature.腹腔镜手术中的套管针损伤:技术、工具及预防方法。文献系统综述
World J Surg. 2016 Oct;40(10):2331-41. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3527-9.