Suppr超能文献

门诊心力衰竭治疗措施与死亡率之间的关联。

Associations between outpatient heart failure process-of-care measures and mortality.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Ahmanson–UCLA Cardiomyopathy Center, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1679, USA.

出版信息

Circulation. 2011 Apr 19;123(15):1601-10. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.989632. Epub 2011 Apr 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Assessment of the quality of care for outpatients with heart failure (HF) has focused on the development and use of process-based performance measures, with the supposition that these care process measures are associated with clinical outcomes. However, this association has not been evaluated for current and emerging outpatient HF measures.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Performance on 7 HF process measures (4 current and 3 emerging) and 2 summary measures was assessed at baseline in patients from 167 US outpatient cardiology practices with patients prospectively followed up for 24 months. Participants included 15 177 patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (≤35%) and chronic HF or post-myocardial infarction. Multivariable analyses were performed to assess the process-outcome relationship for each measure in eligible patients. Vital status was available for 11 621 patients. The mortality rate at 24 months was 22.1%. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker use, β-blocker use, anticoagulant therapy for atrial fibrillation, cardiac resynchronization therapy, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, and HF education for eligible patients were each independently associated with improved 24-month survival, whereas aldosterone antagonist use was not. The all-or-none and composite care summary measures were also independently associated with improved survival. Each 10% improvement in composite care was associated with a 13% lower odds of 24-month mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 0.87; 95% confidence interval, 0.84 to 0.90; P<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Current and emerging outpatient HF process measures are positively associated with patient survival. These HF measures may be useful for assessing and improving HF care.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION- URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00303979.

摘要

背景

对心力衰竭(HF)门诊患者护理质量的评估侧重于开发和使用基于流程的绩效指标,假设这些护理流程措施与临床结果相关。然而,尚未针对当前和新兴的门诊 HF 措施评估这种关联。

方法和结果

在 167 家美国门诊心脏病学实践中,对 7 项 HF 流程措施(4 项当前措施和 3 项新兴措施)和 2 项汇总措施的绩效进行了评估,患者前瞻性随访 24 个月。参与者包括 15177 名左心室射血分数降低(≤35%)、慢性 HF 或心肌梗死后的患者。在合格患者中进行了多变量分析,以评估每个措施的流程-结果关系。11621 名患者的生存状况可用。24 个月时的死亡率为 22.1%。血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂或血管紧张素受体阻滞剂的使用、β受体阻滞剂的使用、心房颤动的抗凝治疗、心脏再同步治疗、植入式心脏复律除颤器和 HF 教育对合格患者的治疗与 24 个月生存率的提高独立相关,而醛固酮拮抗剂的使用则不然。全有或全无和综合护理总结措施也与生存率的提高独立相关。综合护理每提高 10%,24 个月死亡率的几率就会降低 13%(调整后的优势比,0.87;95%置信区间,0.84 至 0.90;P<0.0001)。

结论

当前和新兴的门诊 HF 流程措施与患者生存率呈正相关。这些 HF 措施可能有助于评估和改善 HF 护理。

临床试验注册-网址:http://www.clinicaltrials.gov。唯一标识符:NCT00303979。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验