The Sainsury Laboratory, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7UH, UK.
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2011 May 13;369(1942):1807-16. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2010.0345.
This paper is intended to convey the message of the talk I gave at the Theo Murphy meeting at the Kavli Centre in July 2010. It, like the talk, is polemical, and conveys the exasperation felt by a practitioner of genetically modified (GM) plant science at its widespread misrepresentation. I argue that sustainable intensification of agriculture, using GM as well as other technologies, reduces its environmental impact by reducing pesticide applications and conserving soil carbon by enabling low till methods. Current technologies (primarily insect resistance and herbicide tolerance) have been beneficial. Moreover, the near-term pipeline of new GM methods and traits to enhance our diet, increase crop yields and reduce losses to disease is substantial. It would be perverse to spurn this approach at a time when we need every tool in the toolbox to ensure adequate food production in the short, medium and long term.
本文旨在传达我在 2010 年 7 月在卡弗里理论物理研究所 Theo Murphy 会议上的演讲内容。它像演讲一样具有争议性,表达了从事基因改良(GM)植物科学的人对其广泛误解的愤怒。我认为,通过使用 GM 技术和其他技术来实现农业的可持续集约化,可以通过减少农药的使用和通过允许低耕方法来保护土壤中的碳,从而减少农业对环境的影响。目前的技术(主要是抗虫性和耐除草剂性)是有益的。此外,近期有许多新的 GM 方法和特性可以用来改善我们的饮食、提高作物产量和减少疾病损失,这是相当可观的。在我们需要工具箱中的每一种工具来确保短期、中期和长期内有足够的粮食生产的情况下,拒绝这种方法是荒谬的。