Inorganic Chemistry Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3QR, UK.
Chemistry. 2011 May 2;17(19):5381-6. doi: 10.1002/chem.201003440. Epub 2011 Apr 4.
The ability of substituted carbazol-9-yl systems to ligate in σ fashion through the amido N-donor, or to adopt alternative coordination modes through the π system of the central five-membered ring, can be tuned by systematic variation in the steric demands of substituents in the 1- and 8-positions. The differing affinities of the two modes of coordination for hard and soft metal centres can be shown to influence not only cation selectivity, but also the redox properties of the metal centre. Thus, the highly sterically sterically demanding 1,3,6,8-tetra-tert-butylcarbazolyl ligand can be used to generate the structurally characterised amido-indium(I) complex, [{(tBu(4)carb)In}(n)], (together with its isostructural thallium counterpart) in which the metal centre interacts with the central pyrrolyl ring in η(3) fashion [d(In-N)=2.679(3) Å; d(In-C)=2.819(3), 2.899(3) Å]. By contrast, the smaller 3,6-di-tert-butylcarbazolyl system is less able to restrict the metal centre from binding at the anionic nitrogen donor in the plane of the carbazolyl ligand (i.e. in σ fashion). Analogous chemistry with In(I) precursors therefore leads to disproportionation to the much harder In(II) [and In(0)], and the formation of the mixed-valence product, [In(2){In(2)(tBu(2)carb)(6)}], a homoleptic molecular [In(4)(NR(2))(6)] system. This chemistry reveals a flexibility of ligation for carbazolyl systems that contrasts markedly with that of the similarly sterically encumbered terphenyl ligand family.
取代咔唑-9-基系统通过酰胺 N-供体以 σ 方式键合,或者通过中环的五元环的π系统采用替代配位模式,其能力可以通过在 1-和 8-位取代基的空间需求上进行系统变化来调节。两种配位模式对硬和软金属中心的不同亲和力可以证明不仅影响阳离子选择性,而且影响金属中心的氧化还原性质。因此,高度空间位阻的 1,3,6,8-四-叔丁基咔唑配体可用于生成结构表征的酰胺-铟(I)配合物,[{(tBu(4)carb)In}(n)],(与其同构的铊对应物一起)其中金属中心以 η(3)方式与中心吡咯环相互作用[d(In-N)=2.679(3) Å;d(In-C)=2.819(3),2.899(3) Å]。相比之下,较小的 3,6-二叔丁基咔唑基系统不太能够限制金属中心在咔唑基配体的平面上与阴离子氮供体结合(即 σ 方式)。因此,与 In(I)前体的类似化学导致歧化反应为更硬的 In(II) [和 In(0)],并形成混合价产物,[In(2){In(2)(tBu(2)carb)(6)}],同系物分子[In(4)(NR(2))(6)]系统。这种化学揭示了咔唑基系统的配体灵活性与类似空间位阻的三联苯配体家族形成鲜明对比。