Centre of Academic Primary Care, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill Health Centre, Westburn Road, Aberdeen AB25 2AY, UK.
Fam Pract. 2011 Oct;28(5):554-64. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmr012. Epub 2011 Apr 5.
The number of people surviving cancer for extended periods is increasing. Consequently, due to workload and quality issues, there is considerable interest in alternatives to traditional secondary care-led cancer follow-up.
To explore the views of potential recipients of shared follow-up of cancer. To conduct a modelling exercise for shared follow-up and to explore the opinions and experiences of both the patients and GPs involved.
Semi-structured audio-taped telephone or face-to-face interviews were conducted with 18 patients with a range of cancers currently attending for structured follow-up in secondary care. Six GPs and five patients (four with melanoma and one with stable metastatic colorectal cancer) took part in a shared follow-up modelling exercise. During the modelling exercise, the GPs attended 4 review meetings, which included brief training seminars, and at the conclusion 10 individuals took part in semi-structured audio-taped telephone or face-to-face interviews.
Many rural patients, and some urban patients, would appreciate follow-up being available nearer to home with the associated benefits of time saved and easier parking and continuity of care. Patients have concerns related to the level of extra training received by the GP and loss of contact with their consultant. GPs have concerns about gaining and maintaining the clinical skills needed to conduct follow-up, especially if the numbers of patients seen are small. They also have concerns about lack of support from other GPs, and some administrative and organizational issues.
Many patients would be willing to have GPs share their cancer follow-up with the caveat that they had received extra training and were appropriately supported by secondary care specialists. Patients attending shared care clinics appreciated a local service and longer appointment times. GPs stress the importance of maintaining their own clinical skills and reliable clinical and administrative support from secondary care.
越来越多的人能够长期存活癌症。因此,由于工作量和质量问题,人们对传统的由二级保健主导的癌症随访替代方法产生了浓厚的兴趣。
探讨潜在的癌症共同随访接受者的观点。对共同随访进行建模,并探讨患者和全科医生的意见和经验。
对 18 名患有各种癌症的患者进行了半结构化的电话或面对面访谈,这些患者目前正在二级保健机构接受结构化随访。六名全科医生和五名患者(四名黑色素瘤患者和一名稳定转移性结直肠癌患者)参加了共同随访建模。在建模过程中,全科医生参加了 4 次审查会议,其中包括简短的培训研讨会,在结束时,有 10 人参加了半结构化的电话或面对面访谈。
许多农村患者和一些城市患者希望在离家较近的地方进行随访,这样可以节省时间,停车更方便,也可以保持护理的连续性。患者对全科医生接受的额外培训水平以及与顾问失去联系感到担忧。全科医生对获得和维持进行随访所需的临床技能感到担忧,尤其是在看诊人数较少的情况下。他们还对缺乏来自其他全科医生的支持以及一些行政和组织问题感到担忧。
许多患者愿意让全科医生共同管理他们的癌症随访,但前提是他们接受了额外的培训并得到了二级保健专家的适当支持。参加共同护理诊所的患者欣赏当地的服务和更长的预约时间。全科医生强调保持自己的临床技能以及从二级保健获得可靠的临床和行政支持的重要性。