• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从全科医学角度提高癌症治疗轨迹中护理质量的医疗实践:范围综述。

Healthcare practices that increase the quality of care in cancer trajectories from a general practice perspective: a scoping review.

机构信息

Research Unit for General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense C, Denmark.

Center for Shared Decision Making, Lillebaelt Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark.

出版信息

Scand J Prim Health Care. 2022 Mar;40(1):11-28. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2022.2036421. Epub 2022 Mar 7.

DOI:10.1080/02813432.2022.2036421
PMID:35254205
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9090364/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

General practice plays an important role in cancer trajectories, and cancer patients request the continuous involvement of general practice. The objective of this scoping review was to identify healthcare practices that increase the quality of care in cancer trajectories from a general practice perspective.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND SUBJECTS: A scoping review of the literature published in Danish or English from 2010 to 2020 was conducted. Data was collected using identified keywords and indexed terms in several databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, EBSCO CINAHL, Scopus, and ProQuest), contacting key experts, searching through reference lists, and reports from selected health political, research- and interest organizations' websites.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

We identified healthcare practices in cancer trajectories that increase quality care. Identified healthcare practices were grouped into four contextual domains and allocated to defined phases in the cancer trajectory. The results are presented according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR).

RESULTS

A total of 45 peer-reviewed and six non-peer-reviewed articles and reports were included. Quality of care increases in all phases of the cancer trajectory when GPs listen carefully to the full story and use action plans. After diagnosis, quality of care increases when GPs and practice staff have a proactive care approach, act as interpreters of diagnosis, treatment options, and its consequences, and engage in care coordination with specialists in secondary care involving the patient.

CONCLUSION

This scoping review identified healthcare practices that increase the quality of care in cancer trajectories from a general practice perspective. The results support general practice in investigating own healthcare practices and identifying possibilities for quality improvement.KEY POINTSIdentified healthcare practices in general practice that increase the quality of care in cancer trajectories:Listen carefully to the full storyUse action plans and time-out-consultationsPlan and provide proactive careAct as an interpreter of diagnosis, treatment options, and its consequences for the patientCoordinate care with specialists, patients, and caregivers with mutual respectIdentified barriers for quality of care in cancer trajectories are:Time constraints in consultationsLimited accessibility for patients and caregiversHealth practices to increase the quality of care should be effective, safe, people-centered, timely, equitable, integrated, and efficient. These distinctions of quality of care, support general practice in investigating and improving quality of care in cancer trajectories.

摘要

目的

全科医学在癌症病程中起着重要作用,癌症患者要求全科医学的持续参与。本综述的目的是从全科医学的角度确定提高癌症病程中护理质量的医疗实践。

设计、地点和对象:对 2010 年至 2020 年期间在丹麦语或英语发表的文献进行了范围综述。使用几个数据库(PubMed、MEDLINE、EBSCO CINAHL、Scopus 和 ProQuest)中确定的关键词和索引词、联系关键专家、通过参考文献列表和选定的卫生政治、研究和利益组织网站上的报告收集数据。

主要结果测量

我们确定了提高癌症病程中护理质量的医疗实践。确定的医疗实践被分为四个背景领域,并分配到癌症病程的定义阶段。结果根据系统评价和荟萃分析扩展的首选报告项目(PRISMA-ScR)进行呈现。

结果

共纳入 45 篇同行评议和 6 篇非同行评议的文章和报告。当全科医生仔细倾听完整的故事并使用行动计划时,癌症病程的所有阶段的护理质量都会提高。诊断后,当全科医生和实践工作人员采取积极主动的护理方法、充当诊断、治疗方案及其后果的解释者以及与二级保健专家合作协调涉及患者的护理时,护理质量会提高。

结论

本综述确定了从全科医学角度提高癌症病程中护理质量的医疗实践。结果支持全科医生调查自身医疗实践并确定质量改进的可能性。

关键点

提高癌症病程中护理质量的全科医疗实践:仔细倾听完整的故事使用行动计划和超时咨询计划并提供积极主动的护理充当患者的诊断、治疗方案及其后果的解释者协调与专家、患者和护理人员的护理,相互尊重确定癌症病程中护理质量的障碍是:咨询时间有限患者和护理人员的可及性有限提高护理质量的健康实践应该是有效、安全、以人为主、及时、公平、综合和有效的。这些护理质量的区别,支持全科医生在调查和改善癌症病程中的护理质量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4893/9090364/8077065836a3/IPRI_A_2036421_F0001_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4893/9090364/8077065836a3/IPRI_A_2036421_F0001_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4893/9090364/8077065836a3/IPRI_A_2036421_F0001_C.jpg

相似文献

1
Healthcare practices that increase the quality of care in cancer trajectories from a general practice perspective: a scoping review.从全科医学角度提高癌症治疗轨迹中护理质量的医疗实践:范围综述。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2022 Mar;40(1):11-28. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2022.2036421. Epub 2022 Mar 7.
2
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
5
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
6
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
7
The use of positive deviance approach to improve health service delivery and quality of care: a scoping review.采用正向偏离方法改善医疗服务提供和护理质量:范围综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Apr 8;24(1):438. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10850-2.
8
Quality indicators for substance use disorder care: a scoping review protocol.物质使用障碍护理的质量指标:一项范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 29;15(3):e085216. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085216.
9
Opportunities and practices supporting responsive health care for forced migrants: lessons from transnational practice and a mixed-methods systematic review.支持为被迫移民提供响应式医疗服务的机遇与实践:跨国实践经验及混合方法系统评价
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May;13(13):1-182. doi: 10.3310/MRWK3419.
10
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.对所有医疗环境中共同决策的内部和外部影响进行的定性系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432.

引用本文的文献

1
Increasing challenges of general practitioner-oncologist interaction in end-of-life communication: a qualitative study.临终沟通中全科医生与肿瘤学家互动面临的挑战日益增加:一项定性研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2025 Feb 20;24(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12904-025-01690-w.
2
Challenges of Cross-Sectoral Video Consultation in Cancer Care on Patients' Perceived Coordination: Randomized Controlled Trial.癌症护理中跨部门视频会诊对患者感知协调的挑战:随机对照试验
JMIR Cancer. 2025 Feb 11;11:e60158. doi: 10.2196/60158.
3
Implementation of fracture risk assessment in men with prostate cancer requiring long-term androgen deprivation therapy: a systematic scoping review using the i-PARIHS implementation framework.

本文引用的文献

1
Breaking the general practice-hospital divide: Engaging primary care practitioners in multidisciplinary cancer care.打破全科医疗-医院的隔阂:让初级保健医生参与多学科癌症护理。
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2021 Oct;17(5):e208-e211. doi: 10.1111/ajco.13435. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
2
Understanding the role of GPs' gut feelings in diagnosing cancer in primary care: a systematic review and meta-analysis of existing evidence.理解全科医生在初级保健中诊断癌症时的直觉作用:现有证据的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Br J Gen Pract. 2020 Aug 27;70(698):e612-e621. doi: 10.3399/bjgp20X712301. Print 2020 Sep.
3
Facilitators and barriers to shared primary and specialist cancer care: a systematic review.
在需要长期雄激素剥夺治疗的前列腺癌男性中实施骨折风险评估:使用i-PARIHS实施框架的系统综述
J Cancer Surviv. 2024 Aug 14. doi: 10.1007/s11764-024-01659-3.
4
Follow-up cancer care in Danish general practice: a questionnaire study.丹麦全科医疗中的癌症后续护理:一项问卷调查研究。
BJGP Open. 2024 Jul 29;8(2). doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0215. Print 2024 Jul.
促进和阻碍初级保健与专科癌症护理共享的因素:系统评价。
Support Care Cancer. 2021 Jan;29(1):85-96. doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05624-5. Epub 2020 Aug 17.
4
'Probably better than any medication we can give you': General practitioners' views on exercise and nutrition in cancer.“可能比我们给你的任何药物都好”:全科医生对癌症患者运动和营养的看法。
Aust J Gen Pract. 2020 Aug;49(8):513-518. doi: 10.31128/AJGP-12-19-5176.
5
How do patients with malignant brain tumors experience general practice care and support? Qualitative analysis of English Cancer Patient Experience Survey (CPES) data.恶性脑肿瘤患者如何体验全科医疗护理和支持?对英国癌症患者体验调查(CPES)数据的定性分析。
Neurooncol Pract. 2020 Jun;7(3):313-319. doi: 10.1093/nop/npz062. Epub 2019 Dec 6.
6
Comparing Pathways to Diagnosis and Treatment for Rural and Urban Patients With Colorectal or Breast Cancer: A Qualitative Study.比较农村和城市结直肠癌或乳腺癌患者的诊断和治疗途径:一项定性研究。
J Rural Health. 2020 Sep;36(4):517-535. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12437. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
7
Prioritisation of treatment goals among older patients with non-curable cancer: the OPTion randomised controlled trial in Dutch primary care.老年不可治愈癌症患者治疗目标的优先排序:荷兰初级保健中 OPTion 随机对照试验。
Br J Gen Pract. 2020 Jun 25;70(696):e450-e456. doi: 10.3399/bjgp20X710405. Print 2020 Jul.
8
Cross-sectoral video consultations in cancer care: perspectives of cancer patients, oncologists and general practitioners.跨部门的癌症护理视频咨询:癌症患者、肿瘤医生和全科医生的观点。
Support Care Cancer. 2021 Jan;29(1):107-116. doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05467-0. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
9
GPs' perspectives of the patient encounter - in the context of standardized cancer patient pathways.全科医生视角下的医患交流——以标准化癌症患者路径为背景。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2020 Jun;38(2):238-247. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2020.1753388. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
10
'I had to tell my GP I had lung cancer': patient perspectives of hospital- and community-based lung cancer care.“我不得不告诉我家的全科医生我患有肺癌”:肺癌患者对基于医院和社区的肺癌护理的看法。
Aust J Prim Health. 2020 Apr;26(2):147-152. doi: 10.1071/PY19191.