Suppr超能文献

职业和环境接触极低频磁场:意大利一大群工人的个人监测研究。

Occupational and environmental exposure to extremely low frequency-magnetic fields: a personal monitoring study in a large group of workers in Italy.

机构信息

Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via Campi 287, 41100 Modena, Italy.

出版信息

J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2011 Nov-Dec;21(6):634-45. doi: 10.1038/jes.2011.9. Epub 2011 Apr 6.

Abstract

An inaccurate evaluation of exposure is considered a possible cause for the inadequate conclusiveness of epidemiological research on adverse effects of extremely low frequency-magnetic fields (ELF-MF). The objective of this study is to provide an evaluation of current ELF-MF exposure in workers, the specific contribution of occupational exposure to overall 24-h exposure, and the representativeness of a job exposure matrix (JEM). ELF-MF exposure was monitored in 543 workers for 2 days using personal meters. Time-weighted average (TWA) levels at work, at home and outside the home were calculated. A JEM based on the 1988 International Standard Classification of Occupations (ISCO 88) was created. Median exposure at work, at home and outside the home were 0.14, 0.03 and 0.05 μT, respectively. Occupational exposure accounted for about 60% of 24-h exposure. In the JEM, about 50% of the classified occupations included significantly different individual TWAs. Occupational exposure to ELF-MF appeared low. Median exposure levels at home and outside were 20-28% of the occupational level, giving a minor contribution to overall day-to-day exposure. The frequent occurrence of workers with different TWA included under the same job title highlights the risk of misclassification in epidemiological studies on ELF-MF effects based on JEM.

摘要

暴露评估不准确被认为是流行病学研究低频电磁场(ELF-MF)不良影响不够结论性的一个可能原因。本研究旨在评估当前工人的 ELF-MF 暴露情况、职业暴露对 24 小时总暴露的具体贡献,以及职业暴露矩阵(JEM)的代表性。使用个人剂量计对 543 名工人进行了为期两天的 ELF-MF 暴露监测。计算了工作、家庭和家庭外的时间加权平均(TWA)水平。基于 1988 年国际职业分类标准(ISCO 88)创建了基于 JEM。工作、家庭和家庭外的中位数暴露分别为 0.14、0.03 和 0.05 μT。职业暴露约占 24 小时暴露的 60%。在 JEM 中,约 50%的分类职业的个体 TWA 差异显著。职业 ELF-MF 暴露似乎较低。家庭和家庭外的中位暴露水平分别为职业水平的 20-28%,对日常总暴露的贡献较小。具有不同 TWA 的工人经常被归入同一职务,这突出表明基于 JEM 的 ELF-MF 效应的流行病学研究中存在分类错误的风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验