Suppr超能文献

采用单独的静脉穿刺进行静脉通路和实验室研究可降低溶血率。

Use of separate venipunctures for IV access and laboratory studies decreases hemolysis rates.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, One Deaconess Road, WCC-2, Boston, MA 02215 USA.

出版信息

Intern Emerg Med. 2011 Aug;6(4):357-9. doi: 10.1007/s11739-011-0568-9. Epub 2011 Apr 6.

Abstract

Emergency department (ED) patients routinely undergo placement of a saline lock device (SLD) with the aspiration of blood for laboratory testing. Drawing blood through a SLD may result in hemolysis of sample, repeated venipuncture and increased ED length of stay (LOS). The objective of this study was to examine if separate venipunctures for intravenous (IV) access and laboratory studies decrease the rate of hemolysis and ED LOS. The study was conducted at an urban university level 1 trauma center with an ED volume of 55,000. We compared the rate of hemolysis and ED LOS before and after mandating the use of separate venipunctures for IV access and laboratory studies over 1 month. Venipuncture was performed utilizing either a 21 ga needle or an IV catheter (BD Insight Autoguard) with a needless vacutainer. The incidence of hemolysis was calculated and a Student's t test was used to compare groups. The potassium sample redraw and processing time was observed. Blood was aspirated from 315 patients using the SLD. A baseline hemolysis rate of 23.0% (16.7-29.1) was obtained, corrected to 6.7% after factoring a 29.2% redraw rate for critical potassium levels. In the following month, 2,564 samples were obtained using the butterfly needle with a hemolysis rate of 6.6% (5.5-7.5), corrected to 2.0% after applying the 29.2% redraw rate. Avoiding hemolysis, we saved 4.7% of our patients' 56 min of ED stay, and avoided 185 retests over the month. In conclusion, venipuncture from a butterfly needle decreases the rate of hemolysis and may decrease the overall ED LOS.

摘要

急诊科(ED)患者常规进行生理盐水锁装置(SLD)放置,并抽吸血液进行实验室检查。通过 SLD 采血可能导致样本溶血、反复静脉穿刺和 ED 住院时间延长(LOS)增加。本研究的目的是检验为静脉通路和实验室检查分别进行静脉穿刺是否会降低溶血率和 ED LOS。该研究在一家城市大学一级创伤中心进行,ED 容量为 55000。我们比较了在 1 个月内强制使用分别进行静脉穿刺和实验室检查以获得静脉通路和实验室检查结果前后的溶血率和 ED LOS。静脉穿刺使用 21 号针或静脉导管(BD Insight Autoguard)和无针真空管进行。计算溶血发生率并使用学生 t 检验比较组间差异。观察钾样本重抽和处理时间。使用 SLD 从 315 名患者中抽取血液。获得基线溶血率为 23.0%(16.7-29.1),扣除危急钾水平的 29.2%重抽率后校正为 6.7%。在接下来的一个月中,使用蝶形针获得了 2564 个样本,溶血率为 6.6%(5.5-7.5),扣除 29.2%重抽率后校正为 2.0%。避免溶血,我们为 4.7%的患者节省了 56 分钟的 ED 停留时间,并且在一个月内避免了 185 次重测。总之,蝶形针静脉穿刺可降低溶血率,并可能降低整体 ED LOS。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验