妇女和儿童排在最后——联邦政府拟议的资金削减所产生的可预见影响。 - Suppr

Suppr

超能文献

Women and children last--the predictable effects of proposed federal funding cuts.

作者信息

Annas George J, Mariner Wendy K

机构信息

Department of Health Law, Bioethics, and Human Rights, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, USA.

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 2011 Apr 28;364(17):1590-1. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1102915. Epub 2011 Apr 6.

DOI:10.1056/NEJMp1102915

PMID:21470003

Abstract

摘要

相似文献

Women and children last--the predictable effects of proposed federal funding cuts.

N Engl J Med. 2011 Apr 28;364(17):1590-1. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1102915. Epub 2011 Apr 6.

Public funding for contraceptive, sterilization and abortion services, 1994.

Fam Plann Perspect. 1996 Jul-Aug;28(4):166-73.

The real pro-life stance--health care reform and abortion funding.

N Engl J Med. 2010 Apr 22;362(16):e56. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1003944. Epub 2010 Apr 7.

Public funding of contraceptive, sterilization and abortion services, 1982.

Fam Plann Perspect. 1984 May-Jun;16(3):128-33.

Evolving State-Based Contraceptive and Abortion Policies.

JAMA. 2017 Jun 27;317(24):2481-2482. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.6103.

Abortion politics and health insurance reform.

N Engl J Med. 2009 Dec 31;361(27):2589-91. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0911513. Epub 2009 Dec 2.

Title X, the abortion debate, and the First Amendment.

Columbia Law Rev. 1990 Oct;90(6):1737-78.

Medicaid restructuring.

Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv. 2012 Jan 3:1-70.

Obama overturns ban on federal funding of family planning organisations that promote abortion.

BMJ. 2009 Jan 27;338:b320. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b320.

Public funding of family planning, sterilization and abortion services, 1987.

Fam Plann Perspect. 1988 Sep-Oct;20(5):228-33.

引用本文的文献

Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research, Abortion, and Publication Bias in the .

Linacre Q. 2019 Feb;86(1):103-114. doi: 10.1177/0024363919838855. Epub 2019 Apr 22.

Family planning policy in the United States: the converging politics of abortion and contraception.

Contraception. 2016 May;93(5):412-20. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.01.007. Epub 2016 Jan 13.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型，支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验

相似文献

Women and children last--the predictable effects of proposed federal funding cuts.

N Engl J Med. 2011 Apr 28;364(17):1590-1. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1102915. Epub 2011 Apr 6.

Public funding for contraceptive, sterilization and abortion services, 1994.

Fam Plann Perspect. 1996 Jul-Aug;28(4):166-73.

The real pro-life stance--health care reform and abortion funding.

N Engl J Med. 2010 Apr 22;362(16):e56. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1003944. Epub 2010 Apr 7.

Public funding of contraceptive, sterilization and abortion services, 1982.

Fam Plann Perspect. 1984 May-Jun;16(3):128-33.

Evolving State-Based Contraceptive and Abortion Policies.

JAMA. 2017 Jun 27;317(24):2481-2482. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.6103.

Abortion politics and health insurance reform.

N Engl J Med. 2009 Dec 31;361(27):2589-91. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0911513. Epub 2009 Dec 2.

Title X, the abortion debate, and the First Amendment.

Columbia Law Rev. 1990 Oct;90(6):1737-78.

Medicaid restructuring.

Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv. 2012 Jan 3:1-70.

Obama overturns ban on federal funding of family planning organisations that promote abortion.

BMJ. 2009 Jan 27;338:b320. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b320.

Public funding of family planning, sterilization and abortion services, 1987.

Fam Plann Perspect. 1988 Sep-Oct;20(5):228-33.

引用本文的文献

Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research, Abortion, and Publication Bias in the .

Linacre Q. 2019 Feb;86(1):103-114. doi: 10.1177/0024363919838855. Epub 2019 Apr 22.

Family planning policy in the United States: the converging politics of abortion and contraception.

Contraception. 2016 May;93(5):412-20. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.01.007. Epub 2016 Jan 13.