Suppr超能文献

使用腹腔内非重型聚丙烯补片进行腹腔镜腹疝修补术的成本及临床结果

Cost and clinical outcomes of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair using intraperitoneal nonheavyweight polypropylene mesh.

作者信息

Alkhoury Fuad, Helton Scott, Ippolito Raymond J

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Hospital of Saint Raphael, New Haven, CT 06511, USA.

出版信息

Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2011 Apr;21(2):82-5. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3182139602.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There are a variety of different products available for laparoscopic ventral hernia repairs (LVHR), which vary widely in their costs. There are few clinical studies commenting on cost efficacy of LVHR. The objective of this study is to investigate the cost, safety, and efficacy of using intraperitoneal nonheavyweight polypropylene (PP) mesh in LVHR.

METHODS

Between the years 2002 and 2006, LVHR was performed in 141 consecutive patients (84 male, 57 female) using intraperitoneal PP. Using a 3-trocar technique, PP mesh was underlayed by 3 to 5 cm beyond the edges of the hernia defect and fixed to the abdominal wall with 2 rows of titanium staples. Data concerning the demographics of patients, mesh cost, operative time, length of hospital stay, and complications were collected.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-four patients (95%) were discharged on the day of surgery. Mean age was 58.7 years (range, 29 to 91 y). Mean operative time was 63 minutes (range, 34 to 124 min). Follow-up was achieved in 123 patients (87%) with a mean of 40 months (range, 12 to 68 mo). The average mesh size was 256.9 cm (range, 116 to 903 cm). The cost of the PP mesh was US$0.14 per cm. The average mesh cost per patient was $35.90. When compared with other meshes commonly used for LVHR, PP mesh was substantially cheaper with a cost saving of $436 per patient with proceed, $770 per patient with composix, and $931 per patient with polytetrafluoroethylene. The postoperative complications included: Wound infection n=4 (3.2%), transient partial small bowel obstruction which resolved in all cases without operative management n=3 (2.4%), port site hernia n=2 (1.6%), and seroma n=1 (0.7%). Overall recurrence rate was n=6 (4.8%). There were no conversions to an open procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

LVHR with intraperitoneal PP results in outcomes comparable with earlier publications on LVHR but at reduced costs. These data suggest that the use of intraperitoneal PP in LVHR is safe and cost effective.

摘要

背景

有多种不同产品可用于腹腔镜腹疝修补术(LVHR),其成本差异很大。很少有临床研究对LVHR的成本效益进行评价。本研究的目的是探讨在LVHR中使用腹腔内非重型聚丙烯(PP)补片的成本、安全性和有效性。

方法

在2002年至2006年期间,连续141例患者(84例男性,57例女性)接受了使用腹腔内PP的LVHR手术。采用三套管技术,将PP补片放置在疝缺损边缘以外3至5厘米处进行衬垫,并使用两排钛钉固定于腹壁。收集了有关患者人口统计学、补片成本、手术时间、住院时间和并发症的数据。

结果

134例患者(95%)在手术当天出院。平均年龄为58.7岁(范围29至91岁)。平均手术时间为63分钟(范围34至124分钟)。123例患者(87%)获得随访,平均随访时间为40个月(范围12至68个月)。平均补片大小为256.9平方厘米(范围116至903平方厘米)。PP补片的成本为每平方厘米0.14美元。每位患者的平均补片成本为35.90美元。与其他常用于LVHR的补片相比,PP补片便宜得多,使用proceed补片时每位患者节省成本436美元,使用composix补片时每位患者节省770美元,使用聚四氟乙烯补片时每位患者节省931美元。术后并发症包括:伤口感染n = 4(3.2%),所有病例均在未进行手术治疗的情况下自行缓解的短暂性部分小肠梗阻n = 3(2.4%),穿刺孔疝n = 2(1.6%),血清肿n = 1(0.7%)。总体复发率为n = 6(4.8%)。没有转为开放手术的情况。

结论

使用腹腔内PP进行LVHR的结果与早期关于LVHR的文献报道相当,但成本降低。这些数据表明,在LVHR中使用腹腔内PP是安全且具有成本效益的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验