• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

喷雾漂移受气象和技术因素的影响。

Spray drift as influenced by meteorological and technical factors.

机构信息

Division of Water Quality Management, Department of Soil and Environment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.

出版信息

Pest Manag Sci. 2011 May;67(5):586-98. doi: 10.1002/ps.2114. Epub 2011 Feb 28.

DOI:10.1002/ps.2114
PMID:21472973
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to investigate spray drift from a conventional field sprayer as influenced by meteorological and technical factors, and to provide spray operators with data on which to base sound judgements when applying pesticides. The study was conducted in grazing fields and cereal crops.

RESULTS

Interpreting the results from 15 field trials under varying meteorological conditions using different boom heights and driving speeds indicates that, during normal spraying conditions, the most decisive factors influencing the total spray drift (TSD) will be boom height and wind speed, followed by air temperature, driving speed and vapour pressure deficit. One important finding was that TSD (within the encompassed range of meteorological conditions and a boom height of 0.4 m) could be expressed as a simple function of the fraction of droplets ≤ 100 µm. In cereal crops: TSD = 0.36 + 0.11× [fr. (d ≤ 100 µm)] and in grazing fields, TSD = 1.02 + 0.10× [fr. (d ≤ 100 µm)]. In most cases a fraction of the airborne drift passed over the 6 m sampling mast located 5 m downwind of the spray swath.

CONCLUSIONS

Under specified conditions, the present results indicate a simple relation between the total spray drift and volume fractions of droplets ≤ 100 µm. Given the nozzle type, it was concluded that the most decisive factors determining TSD are wind speed and boom height. Evaluating the relative importance of the meteorological and technical factors contributes to increasing knowledge in this field of research.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在探讨常规田间喷雾器的喷雾飘移情况,分析气象和技术因素的影响,为农药施药操作人员提供基于实际情况进行合理判断的数据支持。该研究在放牧地和谷物作物上进行。

结果

根据不同天气条件、不同喷杆高度和行驶速度下进行的 15 次田间试验结果进行解读,表明在正常喷雾条件下,影响总喷雾飘移(TSD)的最关键因素将是喷杆高度和风速,其次是空气温度、行驶速度和蒸气压亏缺。一个重要发现是,TSD(在气象条件和 0.4 米喷杆高度的涵盖范围内)可以用小于 100 µm 的液滴分数的简单函数表示。在谷物作物中:TSD = 0.36 + 0.11×[fr.(d ≤ 100 µm)],在放牧地中,TSD = 1.02 + 0.10×[fr.(d ≤ 100 µm)]。在大多数情况下,空气中飘移的一部分超过了位于喷雾幅宽下风 5 米处的 6 米采样桅杆。

结论

在特定条件下,总喷雾飘移与小于 100 µm 的液滴体积分数之间存在简单关系。根据喷嘴类型,可以得出决定 TSD 的最关键因素是风速和喷杆高度。评估气象和技术因素的相对重要性有助于增加该研究领域的知识。

相似文献

1
Spray drift as influenced by meteorological and technical factors.喷雾漂移受气象和技术因素的影响。
Pest Manag Sci. 2011 May;67(5):586-98. doi: 10.1002/ps.2114. Epub 2011 Feb 28.
2
Occurrence of spray drift for different crop types: cereal, cereal stubble and grassland.不同作物类型(谷物、谷物茬地和草地)喷雾漂移的发生情况。
Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci. 2008;73(4):743-7.
3
Comparison of collectors of airborne spray drift. Experiments in a wind tunnel and field measurements.喷雾飘移收集器的比较。风洞实验和田间测量。
Pest Manag Sci. 2011 Jun;67(6):725-33. doi: 10.1002/ps.2115. Epub 2011 Mar 28.
4
The effect of air support on droplet characteristics and spray drift.气流辅助对雾滴特性及喷雾飘移的影响。
Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci. 2007;72(2):71-9.
5
Drift studies--comparison of field and wind tunnel experiments.漂移研究——实地试验与风洞试验的比较
Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci. 2005;70(4):971-3.
6
Off-target loss in ornamental nurseries with different spray techniques.不同喷雾技术下观赏植物苗圃中的脱靶损失。
Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci. 2009;74(1):25-36.
7
Interception of spray drift by border structures. Part 2: field experiments.边界结构对喷雾漂移的拦截。第2部分:田间试验。
Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci. 2008;73(4):723-7.
8
Effect of the entrained air and initial droplet velocity on the release height parameter of a Gaussian spray drift model.夹带空气和初始液滴速度对高斯喷雾漂移模型释放高度参数的影响。
Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci. 2006;71(2 Pt A):197-200.
9
Decision support tools for environmentally safe use of pesticides.农药环境安全使用的决策支持工具。
Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci. 2013;78(2):37-45.
10
Evaluation of realtime spray drift using RTDrift Gaussian advection-diffusion model.使用RTDrift高斯平流扩散模型评估实时喷雾漂移。
Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci. 2009;74(1):11-24.

引用本文的文献

1
Spray drift evaluation with point clouds data of 3D LiDAR as a potential alternative to the sampling method.使用三维激光雷达的点云数据进行喷雾漂移评估,作为采样方法的一种潜在替代方案。
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Jul 18;13:939733. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.939733. eCollection 2022.
2
A LiDAR Sensor-Based Spray Boom Height Detection Method and the Corresponding Experimental Validation.基于激光雷达传感器的喷雾机高度检测方法及其实验验证。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Mar 17;21(6):2107. doi: 10.3390/s21062107.
3
Effect of insecticide formulation and adjuvant combination on agricultural spray drift.
杀虫剂配方与助剂组合对农业喷雾漂移的影响。
PeerJ. 2019 Jun 19;7:e7136. doi: 10.7717/peerj.7136. eCollection 2019.
4
Factors affecting aerial spray drift in the Brazilian Cerrado.影响巴西塞拉多地区空中喷雾漂移的因素。
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 19;14(2):e0212289. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212289. eCollection 2019.
5
Pesticide regulatory risk assessment, monitoring, and fate studies in the northern zone: recommendations from a Nordic-Baltic workshop.北方地区农药监管风险评估、监测及归宿研究:北欧 - 波罗的海研讨会建议
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2016 Aug;23(15):15779-88. doi: 10.1007/s11356-016-7087-1. Epub 2016 Jun 22.
6
Residual behavior and risk assessment of the mixed formulation of benzene kresoxim-methyl and fluazinam in cucumber field application.苯醚甲环唑和氟啶胺混配制剂在黄瓜田间应用中的残留行为及风险评估
Environ Monit Assess. 2016 Jun;188(6):341. doi: 10.1007/s10661-016-5345-9. Epub 2016 May 11.
7
Use of a terrestrial LIDAR sensor for drift detection in vineyard spraying.利用地面激光雷达传感器检测葡萄园喷雾中的漂移。
Sensors (Basel). 2013 Jan 2;13(1):516-34. doi: 10.3390/s130100516.