Department of Food Science and Technology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
J Agric Food Chem. 2011 Jul 27;59(14):7536-43. doi: 10.1021/jf103902t. Epub 2011 Apr 7.
The principles of modern pesticide residue chemistry were articulated in the 1950s. Early authors pointed out the advantages of systematizing and standardizing analytical methods for pesticides so that they could be widely practiced and the results could be reproduced from one laboratory to the next. The availability of improved methods has led to a much more complete understanding of pesticide behavior and fate in foods and the environment. Using methods based largely upon gas chromatography (GC) and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) coupled increasingly with mass spectrometry (MS) and MS(n) as the detection tool, residues can be measured at parts per billion levels and below in a variety of food and environmental matrices. Development of efficient extraction and cleanup methods, techniques such as ELISA, efficient sample preparation techniques such as QuEChERS, and automated laboratory and field instrumentation has also contributed to the tools available for use in modern pesticide residue analysis. As a result, great strides have been made in improving food and worker safety and in understanding environmental behavior and fate of pesticides. There are many challenges remaining in the field of pesticide residue chemistry that will continue to stimulate analytical chemists. New chemistries are emerging, often patterned on complex natural products. Analyzing for the parent chemicals and potentially multiple breakdown products will require analytical ingenuity. The development of more sensitive bioassays and knowledge of unintended side effects will challenge residue chemistry as well, as in the case of following the fate of environmental endocrine disruptors associated with some pesticides as well as nonpesticide contaminants from packaging materials and other familiar articles. Continued funding and other resources to ensure better training, international cooperation, and accelerated research and development activities will be a constant need in pesticide residue chemistry as it is for all areas of science that aim to mitigate or eliminate contaminants that can affect human and environmental health and safety.
现代农药残留化学的原则在 20 世纪 50 年代被阐明。早期的作者指出,系统地和标准化地制定农药分析方法的优势在于可以广泛应用,并且可以从一个实验室复制到另一个实验室。改进方法的可用性使得人们对农药在食品和环境中的行为和归宿有了更全面的理解。使用主要基于气相色谱(GC)和高效液相色谱(HPLC)的方法,越来越多地与质谱(MS)和多级质谱(MS(n))相结合作为检测工具,可以在各种食品和环境基质中测量到十亿分之几甚至更低水平的残留。高效提取和净化方法的开发、酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)等技术、QuEChERS 等高效样品制备技术以及自动化实验室和现场仪器的发展,也为现代农药残留分析提供了可用的工具。因此,在提高食品和工人安全以及了解农药的环境行为和归宿方面取得了巨大进展。农药残留化学领域仍存在许多挑战,这将继续激发分析化学家的兴趣。新的化学物质不断涌现,通常模仿复杂的天然产物。分析母体化学物质和潜在的多种分解产物将需要分析上的创造力。更敏感的生物测定法的发展以及对意外副作用的了解也将对残留化学提出挑战,例如,跟踪与一些农药相关的环境内分泌干扰物的归宿,以及来自包装材料和其他常见物品的非农药污染物。为了确保更好的培训、国际合作以及加速研究和开发活动,在农药残留化学领域以及所有旨在减轻或消除可能影响人类和环境健康与安全的污染物的科学领域,都需要持续的资金和其他资源。