Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Trinity College Dublin, Trinity College Centre for Health Sciences, AMNCH, Tallaght, Dublin 24, Ireland.
Am J Manag Care. 2011 Feb;17(2):105-13.
To evaluate the effectiveness of a psychological, family-based intervention to improve diabetes-related outcomes in patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes.
This study was a randomized controlled trial of a psychological family-based intervention targeted at individuals with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes. Recruitment and follow-up occurred at specialist diabetes clinics. Patients were randomly allocated to an intervention group (n=60) or a control group (n=61). Poor control was defined as at least 2 of the patient's last 3 glycated hemoglobin (A1C) readings at >8.0%. The intervention consisted of 2 sessions delivered by a health psychologist to the patient and a family member in the patient's home, with a third session involving a 15-minute follow-up telephone call.
At 6-month follow-up, the intervention group reported significantly lower mean A1C levels than the control group (8.4% [SD=0.99%] vs 8.8% [SD=1.36%]; P=.04). The intervention was most effective in those with the poorest control at baseline (A1C>9.5%) (intervention 8.7% [SD=1.16%, n=15] vs control 9.9% [SD=1.31%, n=15]; P=.01). The intervention group also reported statistically significant improvements in beliefs about diabetes, psychological well-being, diet, exercise, and family support.
After participating in a family-based intervention targeting negative and/or inaccurate illness perceptions, patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes showed improvements in A1C levels and other outcomes. Our results suggest that adding a psychological, family-based component to usual diabetes care may help improve diabetes management.
评估一种心理、家庭为基础的干预措施在改善控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病患者的糖尿病相关结局方面的有效性。
这是一项针对控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病患者的心理家庭为基础的干预措施的随机对照试验。招募和随访在专科糖尿病诊所进行。患者被随机分配到干预组(n=60)或对照组(n=61)。控制不佳定义为患者过去 3 次糖化血红蛋白(A1C)读数中至少有 2 次>8.0%。干预措施包括由健康心理学家为患者及其家庭成员在患者家中进行的 2 次治疗,以及 1 次 15 分钟的随访电话。
在 6 个月的随访中,干预组的平均 A1C 水平明显低于对照组(8.4%[SD=0.99%]与 8.8%[SD=1.36%];P=.04)。该干预措施在基线时控制最差的患者中效果最为显著(A1C>9.5%)(干预组 8.7%[SD=1.16%,n=15]与对照组 9.9%[SD=1.31%,n=15];P=.01)。干预组还报告了在糖尿病信念、心理健康、饮食、运动和家庭支持方面的统计学上显著的改善。
参与针对负面和/或不准确的疾病认知的家庭为基础的干预措施后,控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病患者的 A1C 水平和其他结果有所改善。我们的结果表明,在常规糖尿病护理中加入心理、家庭为基础的干预措施可能有助于改善糖尿病管理。