• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

SYNTAX 评分在接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者中的价值:MI SYNTAXscore 研究。

Value of the SYNTAX score in patients treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction: The MI SYNTAXscore study.

机构信息

Thoraxcenter, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Am Heart J. 2011 Apr;161(4):771-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2011.01.004.

DOI:10.1016/j.ahj.2011.01.004
PMID:21473978
Abstract

AIMS

The aims of this study were to evaluate the SYNTAX score (SXscore) calculated at 2 stages during a primary percutaneous intervention (PPCI), that is, SXscore I (diagnostic) and SXscore II (postwiring), and assess its additional value to standard clinical risk scores in acute myocardial infarction.

METHODS AND RESULTS

SXscores I and II were applied to 736 consecutive acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients referred for PPCI between November 2006 and February 2008. SXscore changed significantly before (I: 16, interquartile range 9.5-23) and after wiring (II: 11, interquartile range 6-19), P < .001. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to compare the primary end point major adverse coronary events (MACE; composite of repeat MI, target vessel revascularization [TVR], and mortality) and secondary end point mortality at 1.5 years in tertiles of SXscore I and SXscore II. Major adverse coronary event was highest in the higher SXscore I tertile (11% vs 15% vs 23%, log-rank <0.01), driven primarily by increased rate of mortality (9% vs 11% vs 17%, log-rank 0.02). Major adverse coronary event was also highest in SXscore II tertile, by a combination of increased mortality and also TVR (TVR rate 2% vs 3% vs 9%, log-rank <0.01). Predictive Cox regression models for mortality and MACE were significantly and similarly improved by the addition of either SXscore I or SXscore II (hazard ratio 1.63, 95% CI 1.18-2.26, P < .01 for MACE) with respective c indices of 0.61 and 0.63 for MACE and 0.60 and 0.61 for mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

SXscore during PPCI is a useful tool that provides additional risk stratification to known risk factors of long-term mortality and MACE in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PPCI)的两个阶段计算的 SYNTAX 评分(SXscore),即 SXscore I(诊断性)和 SXscore II(后置线),并评估其在急性心肌梗死中对标准临床风险评分的附加价值。

方法和结果

2006 年 11 月至 2008 年 2 月,对 736 例连续急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者进行 PPCI 治疗,应用 SXscore I 和 II。SXscore 在置线前后有显著变化(I:16,四分位距 9.5-23;II:11,四分位距 6-19),P<0.001。Kaplan-Meier 方法比较 SXscore I 和 II 三分位的主要不良冠状动脉事件(MACE;再发心肌梗死、靶血管血运重建和死亡率的复合终点)和 1.5 年死亡率的主要终点。在较高的 SXscore I 三分位,MACE 发生率最高(11%比 15%比 23%,log-rank<0.01),主要由死亡率增加驱动(9%比 11%比 17%,log-rank 0.02)。SXscore II 三分位的 MACE 发生率也最高,这是由于死亡率和靶血管血运重建率增加的共同作用(TVR 发生率 2%比 3%比 9%,log-rank<0.01)。Cox 回归模型显示,死亡率和 MACE 的预测模型均因加入 SXscore I 或 SXscore II 而显著改善(MACE 的危险比为 1.63,95%CI 为 1.18-2.26,P<0.01),相应的 C 指数分别为 0.61 和 0.63 用于 MACE,0.60 和 0.61 用于死亡率。

结论

PPCI 期间的 SXscore 是一种有用的工具,可为 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的长期死亡率和 MACE 的已知危险因素提供额外的风险分层。

相似文献

1
Value of the SYNTAX score in patients treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction: The MI SYNTAXscore study.SYNTAX 评分在接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者中的价值:MI SYNTAXscore 研究。
Am Heart J. 2011 Apr;161(4):771-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2011.01.004.
2
Comparison of the predictive value of four different risk scores for outcomes of patients with ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.四种不同风险评分对接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死患者预后预测价值的比较。
Am J Cardiol. 2008 Jul 1;102(1):6-11. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.02.088. Epub 2008 May 28.
3
Usefulness of the SYNTAX score to predict "no reflow" in patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.SYNTAX 评分预测 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后无复流的价值。
Am J Cardiol. 2012 Mar 1;109(5):601-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.10.013. Epub 2011 Dec 15.
4
Comparison of thrombolysis followed by broad use of percutaneous coronary intervention with primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment-elevation acute myocardial infarction: data from the french registry on acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (FAST-MI).ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死溶栓后广泛应用经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的比较:来自法国急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死注册研究(FAST-MI)的数据
Circulation. 2008 Jul 15;118(3):268-76. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.762765. Epub 2008 Jun 30.
5
A model for predicting mortality in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention: results from the Assessment of Pexelizumab in Acute Myocardial Infarction Trial.急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后死亡率的预测模型:来自 Pexelizumab 在急性心肌梗死试验中的评估结果。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Oct;3(5):414-22. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.109.925180. Epub 2010 Sep 21.
6
Time to treatment and three-year mortality after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction-a DANish Trial in Acute Myocardial Infarction-2 (DANAMI-2) substudy.直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的治疗时间和 3 年死亡率:丹麦急性心肌梗死 2 号试验(DANAMI-2)的一个亚研究。
Am J Cardiol. 2010 Jun 1;105(11):1528-34. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.01.005. Epub 2010 Apr 14.
7
The MI SYNTAX score for risk stratification in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for treatment of acute myocardial infarction: a substudy of the COMFORTABLE AMI trial.用于急性心肌梗死治疗的直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者风险分层的心肌梗死SYNTAX评分:COMFORTABLE AMI试验的一项子研究
Int J Cardiol. 2014 Aug 1;175(2):314-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.05.029. Epub 2014 May 17.
8
Predicting mortality in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PAMI risk score).预测接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的死亡率(PAMI风险评分)。
Am J Cardiol. 2004 Mar 1;93(5):629-32. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2003.11.036.
9
ST-segment recovery and outcome after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: insights from the Assessment of Pexelizumab in Acute Myocardial Infarction (APEX-AMI) trial.ST段抬高型心肌梗死直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的ST段恢复情况及预后:急性心肌梗死中佩昔单抗评估(APEX-AMI)试验的见解
Circulation. 2008 Sep 23;118(13):1335-46. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.767772. Epub 2008 Sep 8.
10
Long-term prognostic value of ST-segment resolution in patients treated with fibrinolysis or primary percutaneous coronary intervention results from the DANAMI-2 (DANish trial in acute myocardial infarction-2).溶栓或直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者中ST段回落的长期预后价值:来自DANAMI-2(丹麦急性心肌梗死试验-2)的结果
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Nov 3;54(19):1763-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.03.084.

引用本文的文献

1
A scoring system combining CatLet score and clinical variables as a predictor of long-term prognosis in patients with chronic coronary syndrome after percutaneous coronary intervention.一种结合CatLet评分和临床变量的评分系统,作为经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后慢性冠状动脉综合征患者长期预后的预测指标。
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2025 Sep 1;15(9):8112-8124. doi: 10.21037/qims-2025-171. Epub 2025 Aug 19.
2
Residual coronary artery tree description and lesion EvaluaTion (CatLet) score, clinical variables, and their associations with outcome predictions in patients with acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死患者的残余冠状动脉树描述和病变评估(CatLet)评分、临床变量及其与预后预测的关系。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2023 Oct 20;136(20):2459-2467. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000002640. Epub 2023 Apr 12.
3
Prediction of SYNTAX score II improvement by adding temporal heart rate changes between discharge and first outpatient visit in patients with acute myocardial infarction.预测急性心肌梗死后出院和首次门诊就诊之间的心率变化对 SYNTAX 评分 II 的改善。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2022 Nov 8;22(1):470. doi: 10.1186/s12872-022-02929-7.
4
The predictive value of CatLet© angiographic scoring system for long-term prognosis in patients with acute myocardial infarction presenting > 12 h after symptom onset.CatLet©血管造影评分系统对症状发作超过12小时的急性心肌梗死患者长期预后的预测价值。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Sep 21;9:943229. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.943229. eCollection 2022.
5
Impact of Metabolic Syndrome and Its Components on Clinical Severity and Long-Term Prognosis in Patients With Premature Myocardial Infarction.代谢综合征及其组分对早发性心肌梗死患者临床严重程度和长期预后的影响。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Jun 30;13:920470. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.920470. eCollection 2022.
6
The relationship between IL-6 levels and the angiographic severity of coronary artery disease following percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndrome patients.急性冠脉综合征患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后白细胞介素 6 水平与冠状动脉病变严重程度的关系。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2021 Dec 3;21(1):578. doi: 10.1186/s12872-021-02406-7.
7
The predictive values of GGT and Hcy in the risk stratifications and prognoses of NSTE-ACS patients.γ-谷氨酰转移酶(GGT)和同型半胱氨酸(Hcy)在非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征(NSTE-ACS)患者风险分层及预后中的预测价值。
Am J Transl Res. 2021 Aug 15;13(8):9269-9277. eCollection 2021.
8
'Ticagrelor alone vs. dual antiplatelet therapy from 1 month after drug-eluting coronary stenting among patients with STEMI': a post hoc analysis of the randomized GLOBAL LEADERS trial.替格瑞洛单药治疗与药物洗脱冠状动脉支架置入术后 1 个月双联抗血小板治疗在 STEMI 患者中的对比:随机 GLOBAL LEADERS 试验的事后分析。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2021 Oct 1;10(7):756-773. doi: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuab033.
9
Novel Combined Antioxidant Strategy against Hypertension, Acute Myocardial Infarction and Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation.针对高血压、急性心肌梗死和术后房颤的新型联合抗氧化策略
Biomedicines. 2021 May 30;9(6):620. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines9060620.
10
Quantitative Flow Ratio to Predict Nontarget Vessel-Related Events at 5 Years in Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Angiography-Guided Revascularization.定量血流比预测 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者经血管造影指导血运重建后 5 年的非靶血管相关事件。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 May 4;10(9):e019052. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.019052. Epub 2021 Apr 26.