• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗、难治性心源性休克及实验室内心脏骤停期间经皮生命支持的疗效与安全性。

Efficacy and safety of percutaneous life support during high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention, refractory cardiogenic shock and in-laboratory cardiopulmonary arrest.

作者信息

Bagai Jayant, Webb David, Kasasbeh Ehab, Crenshaw Marshall, Salloum Joseph, Chen Jack, Zhao David

机构信息

Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Vanderbilt Heart and Vascular Institute, 1215 21st Avenue S., Nashville, TN 37232-8802, USA.

出版信息

J Invasive Cardiol. 2011 Apr;23(4):141-7.

PMID:21474846
Abstract

BACKGROUND

High-risk percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), refractory cardiogenic shock and in-lab cardiac arrest are all associated with significant mortality. Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices (pLVAD) and CPS (cardiopulmonary support) have been used to support such patients. However, the extent to which the use of these devices can improve outcomes in this patient subset is not known.

METHODS

We evaluated clinical features, efficacy and safety outcomes in a retrospective cohort of 39 patients, treated either with pLVAD or CPS for support of high-risk PCI, cardiogenic shock or in-lab cardiac arrest. The Tandem-Heart and a new versatile Multifunctional Percutaneous Heart (MPH) system, with both CPS and LVAD capability, were used and assessed.

RESULTS

19 patients received the TandemHeart and 20 received the MPH system. The MPH system was used as a pLVAD in 12 and to provide CPS in 8 patients. Procedural efficacy was 100%. Emergent institution of CPS, in the setting of cardiac arrest, was able to support 7 out of 8 patients and resulted in a 50% survival to hospital discharge rate. Overall, in-hospital death and 30-day major adverse cardiac event rates were 28.2% and 35.9%, respectively. The risk of vascular complications and bleeding was relatively small.

CONCLUSIONS

pLVADs are effective in supporting patients during high-risk cardiac (coronary and structural heart) interventions, with a low risk of device-related complications. Further, the expeditious use of CPS in the catheterization laboratory can improve survival in a selected subset of patients with refractory cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest.

摘要

背景

高风险经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)、难治性心源性休克和实验室内心脏骤停均与显著的死亡率相关。经皮左心室辅助装置(pLVAD)和心肺支持(CPS)已被用于支持此类患者。然而,这些装置的使用能在多大程度上改善该患者亚组的预后尚不清楚。

方法

我们评估了39例接受pLVAD或CPS治疗以支持高风险PCI、心源性休克或实验室内心脏骤停的患者的回顾性队列中的临床特征、疗效和安全性结果。使用并评估了Tandem-Heart和一种新型多功能经皮心脏(MPH)系统,该系统兼具CPS和LVAD功能。

结果

19例患者接受了TandemHeart,20例接受了MPH系统。MPH系统在12例患者中用作pLVAD,在8例患者中用于提供CPS。手术成功率为100%。在心脏骤停情况下紧急启用CPS能够支持8例患者中的7例,并使出院生存率达到50%。总体而言,住院死亡率和30天主要不良心脏事件发生率分别为28.2%和35.9%。血管并发症和出血风险相对较小。

结论

pLVAD在高风险心脏(冠状动脉和结构性心脏病)介入治疗期间有效支持患者,与装置相关的并发症风险较低。此外,在导管室中迅速使用CPS可提高难治性心源性休克和心脏骤停患者特定亚组的生存率。

相似文献

1
Efficacy and safety of percutaneous life support during high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention, refractory cardiogenic shock and in-laboratory cardiopulmonary arrest.高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗、难治性心源性休克及实验室内心脏骤停期间经皮生命支持的疗效与安全性。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2011 Apr;23(4):141-7.
2
Percutaneous life support: is it safe to plug and play?
J Invasive Cardiol. 2011 Apr;23(4):148.
3
Clinical use of temporary percutaneous left ventricular assist devices.临时经皮左心室辅助装置的临床应用。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Aug 1;78(2):304-13. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22948. Epub 2011 Jul 15.
4
Percutaneous left ventricular support for high-risk PCI and cardiogenic shock: who gets what?经皮左心室支持用于高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗和心源性休克:谁适合哪种治疗?
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2012 Mar-Apr;13(2):101-5. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2012.01.003. Epub 2012 Mar 7.
5
Resuscitation of non-postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock or cardiac arrest with extracorporeal life support: the role of bridging to intervention.体外生命支持复苏非心脏手术后心源性休克或心搏骤停:桥接介入治疗的作用。
Resuscitation. 2012 Aug;83(8):976-81. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.01.010. Epub 2012 Jan 21.
6
Use of the percutaneous left ventricular assist device in patients with severe refractory cardiogenic shock as a bridge to long-term left ventricular assist device implantation.经皮左心室辅助装置在严重难治性心源性休克患者中作为长期左心室辅助装置植入的桥梁的应用。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2008 Jan;27(1):106-11. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2007.10.013.
7
Outcome of emergency percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction complicated by cardiac arrest.急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死合并心脏骤停的急诊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的结果
Coron Artery Dis. 2008 Dec;19(8):615-8. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0b013e32831381b4.
8
[Emergency percutaneous cardiopulmonary support for patients with cardiac arrest or severe cardiogenic shock].[心脏骤停或严重心源性休克患者的急诊经皮心肺支持]
Nihon Kyobu Geka Gakkai Zasshi. 1996 Nov;44(11):2006-10.
9
Percutaneous cardiopulmonary support after acute myocardial infarction at the left main trunk.急性心肌梗死累及左主干后的经皮心肺支持
Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009 Apr;15(2):93-7.
10
[Prolonged successful resuscitation with simultaneous complex angioplasty of the left anterior descending coronary artery in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock--a case report].[急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克时左前降支冠状动脉同步复杂血管成形术的长期成功复苏——病例报告]
Kardiol Pol. 2007 Jun;65(6):691-6; discussion 696-7.