• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临时经皮左心室辅助装置的临床应用。

Clinical use of temporary percutaneous left ventricular assist devices.

机构信息

Cardiology, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.

出版信息

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Aug 1;78(2):304-13. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22948. Epub 2011 Jul 15.

DOI:10.1002/ccd.22948
PMID:21766420
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Temporary percutaneous left ventricular assist devices (TPLVAD) can be inserted and removed in awake patients. They substitute left ventricular function for a period of up to a few weeks and provide an excellent backup and bridge to recovery or decision.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 75 patients who received TPLVAD to treat cardiogenic shock (n = 49) or to facilitate high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (n = 26). Forty-two patients with cardiogenic shock and 16 patients with high-risk PCI received a TandemHeart and 7 patients and 10 patients, respectively, received an Impella Recover LP 2.5. Outcome and related complications up to 1 month are reported with reference to device depending function.

RESULTS

One-month survival was 53% in patients with shock and 96% in patients with PCI.

CONCLUSION

TPLVADs can support the failing heart with acceptable risk. Outcome is better in prophylactic use than in patients with cardiogenic shock.

摘要

背景

临时经皮左心室辅助装置(TPLVAD)可在清醒患者中插入和移除。它们可以替代左心室功能长达数周,并为恢复或决策提供出色的后备和桥接。

方法

回顾性分析了 75 例接受 TPLVAD 治疗心源性休克(n = 49)或促进高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)(n = 26)的患者。42 例心源性休克患者和 16 例高危 PCI 患者接受了 TandemHeart,7 例和 10 例患者分别接受了 Impella Recover LP 2.5。根据设备相关功能报告了 1 个月内的预后和相关并发症。

结果

休克患者的 1 个月生存率为 53%,PCI 患者的 1 个月生存率为 96%。

结论

TPLVAD 可以以可接受的风险支持衰竭的心脏。预防性使用的结果优于心源性休克患者。

相似文献

1
Clinical use of temporary percutaneous left ventricular assist devices.临时经皮左心室辅助装置的临床应用。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Aug 1;78(2):304-13. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22948. Epub 2011 Jul 15.
2
Use of Impella Recover 2.5 left ventricular assist device in patients with cardiogenic shock or undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention procedures: experience of a high-volume center.Impella Recover 2.5左心室辅助装置在心源性休克患者或接受高风险经皮冠状动脉介入手术患者中的应用:一个大容量中心的经验。
Minerva Cardioangiol. 2008 Aug;56(4):391-9.
3
Efficacy and safety of percutaneous life support during high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention, refractory cardiogenic shock and in-laboratory cardiopulmonary arrest.高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗、难治性心源性休克及实验室内心脏骤停期间经皮生命支持的疗效与安全性。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2011 Apr;23(4):141-7.
4
High-risk percutaneous coronary intervention with the TandemHeart and Impella devices: a single-center experience.使用TandemHeart和Impella设备进行高风险经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:单中心经验
J Invasive Cardiol. 2011 Oct;23(10):417-24.
5
Percutaneous left ventricular support for high-risk PCI and cardiogenic shock: who gets what?经皮左心室支持用于高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗和心源性休克:谁适合哪种治疗?
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2012 Mar-Apr;13(2):101-5. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2012.01.003. Epub 2012 Mar 7.
6
Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices for treatment of patients with cardiogenic shock.用于治疗心源性休克患者的经皮左心室辅助装置
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2007 Oct;13(5):521-7. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e3282efd5bc.
7
Preliminary experience with Impella Recover(®) LP5.0 in nine patients with cardiogenic shock: a new circulatory support system in the intensive cardiac care unit.Impella Recover(®) LP5.0 在 9 例心原性休克患者中的初步应用经验:重症心脏监护病房中的新型循环支持系统。
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2011 Aug;104(8-9):458-64. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2011.04.005. Epub 2011 Aug 27.
8
Tools & techniques: Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices.工具与技术:经皮左心室辅助装置
EuroIntervention. 2011 Sep;7(5):636-7. doi: 10.4244/EIJV7I5A101.
9
Comparative outcomes in cardiogenic shock patients managed with Impella microaxial pump or extracorporeal life support.比较使用 Impella 微轴流泵或体外生命支持治疗心源性休克患者的结果。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011 Jul;142(1):60-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.07.075. Epub 2010 Sep 28.
10
Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices vs. intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation for treatment of cardiogenic shock: a meta-analysis of controlled trials.经皮左心室辅助装置与主动脉内球囊反搏治疗心原性休克的对比:对照试验的荟萃分析。
Eur Heart J. 2009 Sep;30(17):2102-8. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehp292. Epub 2009 Jul 18.