• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

直肠癌系膜延伸的临床意义:一项日本多机构研究。

Clinical significance of the mesorectal extension of rectal cancer: a Japanese multi-institutional study.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Kurume University School of Medicine, Fukuoka, Japan.

出版信息

Ann Surg. 2011 Apr;253(4):704-10. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182119331.

DOI:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182119331
PMID:21475010
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to emphasize the importance of a subclassification in the TNM staging system of rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND

The clinical significance of the mesorectal extension of rectal cancer is unclear.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data from 463 consecutive patients with stage IIa disease (T3N0) undergoing curative surgery at 28 institutes were analyzed. The measurement of the distance of the mesorectal extension (DME) was histologically evaluated. Risk factors for recurrence, for the optimal cutoff point of the DME, independent prognostic factors, and for survivals were studied using receiver operating characteristic curve and logistic and Cox regression analyses. Survivals were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

A value of 4 mm was determined as the optimal cutoff point. The patients were subdivided into 2 groups: DME ≤ 4 mm and DME > 4 mm at the optimal cutoff point. DME > 4 mm had the greatest impact on recurrence-free survival [P = 0.00023, hazard ratio (HR): 2.26, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.465-3.492, L/U ratio: 0.420] and was an independent adverse prognostic factor (P = 0.00323, HR: 1.97, 95% CI: 1.254-3.091). The distant metastasis rate in DME > 4 mm was higher 16.7% than that in DME ≤ 4 mm (P = 0.00177, OR: 2.61, 95% CI: 1.430-4.761). The incidence of local recurrence was not influenced by DME. The recurrence-free 5-year survival rate in DME ≤ 4 mm was significantly better than that in DME > 4 mm (86.6% vs 71.3%, P = 0.00015, HR: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.286-0.683). The cancer-specific survival rate in DME ≤ 4 mm was also significantly better than that in DME > 4 mm (91.3% vs 82.2%, P = 0.000664, HR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.325-0.843).

CONCLUSIONS

A subclassification according to mesorectal extension based on a 4-mm cutoff point is needed for the TNM staging system. However, further prospective study is necessary to prove reproducibility and validity of the cutoff point.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在强调直肠癌 TNM 分期系统中进行亚分类的重要性。

背景

直肠癌中直肠系膜延伸的临床意义尚不清楚。

患者和方法

对 28 家机构接受根治性手术的 463 例 IIa 期(T3N0)患者的数据进行分析。采用组织学评估测量直肠系膜延伸的距离(DME)。使用接收者操作特征曲线、逻辑和 Cox 回归分析研究复发的危险因素、DME 的最佳截断值、独立预后因素和生存率。使用 Kaplan-Meier 方法计算生存率。

结果

确定 4mm 为最佳截断值。将患者分为 2 组:DME≤4mm 和 DME>4mm 在最佳截断值处。DME>4mm 对无复发生存率的影响最大[P=0.00023,风险比(HR):2.26,95%置信区间(95%CI):1.465-3.492,L/U 比:0.420],是独立的不良预后因素(P=0.00323,HR:1.97,95%CI:1.254-3.091)。DME>4mm 的远处转移率为 16.7%,高于 DME≤4mm(P=0.00177,OR:2.61,95%CI:1.430-4.761)。DME 对局部复发的发生率没有影响。DME≤4mm 的无复发生存率 5 年明显优于 DME>4mm(86.6%比 71.3%,P=0.00015,HR:0.44,95%CI:0.286-0.683)。DME≤4mm 的癌症特异性生存率也明显优于 DME>4mm(91.3%比 82.2%,P=0.000664,HR:0.52,95%CI:0.325-0.843)。

结论

需要根据 4mm 截断值对直肠系膜延伸进行基于亚分类的 TNM 分期系统。然而,需要进一步的前瞻性研究来证明该截断值的可重复性和有效性。

相似文献

1
Clinical significance of the mesorectal extension of rectal cancer: a Japanese multi-institutional study.直肠癌系膜延伸的临床意义:一项日本多机构研究。
Ann Surg. 2011 Apr;253(4):704-10. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182119331.
2
Predicting oncologic outcomes by stratifying mesorectal extension in patients with pT3 rectal cancer: a Japanese multi-institutional study.预测 T3 期直肠癌患者中中直肠延伸的肿瘤学结果:一项日本多机构研究。
Int J Cancer. 2012 Sep 1;131(5):1220-7. doi: 10.1002/ijc.27315. Epub 2012 Jan 3.
3
Depth of mesorectal extension has prognostic significance in patients with T3 rectal cancer.中低位直肠癌系膜浸润深度对 T3 期直肠癌患者有预后意义。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2012 Dec;55(12):1220-8. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31826fea6a.
4
Postoperative morbidity and mortality after mesorectal excision with and without lateral lymph node dissection for clinical stage II or stage III lower rectal cancer (JCOG0212): results from a multicentre, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial.中低位直肠癌行直肠系膜切除术联合或不联合侧方淋巴结清扫的术后发病率和死亡率(JCOG0212):来自一项多中心、随机对照、非劣效性试验的结果。
Lancet Oncol. 2012 Jun;13(6):616-21. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70158-4. Epub 2012 May 15.
5
Depth of mesorectal invasion has prognostic significance in T3N0 low rectal cancer.直肠系膜侵犯深度在T3N0低位直肠癌中具有预后意义。
Hepatogastroenterology. 2009 Jan-Feb;56(89):124-7.
6
Local recurrence after mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.直肠癌直肠系膜切除术后的局部复发
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2002 Mar;28(2):126-34. doi: 10.1053/ejso.2001.1231.
7
Minimally invasive versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: Long-term results from a case-matched study of 633 patients.直肠癌的微创与开放全直肠系膜切除术:633例病例匹配研究的长期结果
Surgery. 2015 Jun;157(6):1121-9. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.01.010. Epub 2015 Feb 28.
8
Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging assessment of circumferential resection margin predicts disease-free survival and local recurrence: 5-year follow-up results of the MERCURY study.术前磁共振成像评估环周切缘预测无病生存和局部复发:MERCURY 研究的 5 年随访结果。
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Jan 1;32(1):34-43. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.45.3258. Epub 2013 Nov 25.
9
Prognostic subdivision of ypT3 rectal tumours according to extension beyond the muscularis propria.根据肿瘤侵犯固有肌层以外的范围对 ypT3 直肠肿瘤进行预后亚组划分。
Br J Surg. 2014 Apr;101(5):566-72. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9419. Epub 2014 Jan 29.
10
Early rectal cancer: local excision or radical surgery?早期直肠癌:局部切除还是根治性手术?
J Surg Educ. 2008 Jan-Feb;65(1):67-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2007.11.002.

引用本文的文献

1
MRI for prognosis prediction of T3-stage rectal cancer based on "DISTANCE" structural report.基于“DISTANCE”结构报告的MRI对T3期直肠癌预后的预测
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025 Aug 9. doi: 10.1007/s00261-025-05126-0.
2
Predictive value of lesion morphology in rectal cancer based on MRI before surgery.术前 MRI 下直肠癌病变形态学预测价值。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2023 Sep 19;23(1):318. doi: 10.1186/s12876-023-02910-4.
3
Required distal mesorectal resection margin in partial mesorectal excision: a systematic review on distal mesorectal spread.
部分直肠系膜切除时需要远端直肠系膜切缘:远端直肠系膜扩散的系统评价。
Tech Coloproctol. 2023 Jan;27(1):11-21. doi: 10.1007/s10151-022-02690-1. Epub 2022 Aug 29.
4
Stage cT3 low rectal cancer: analysis of prognostic factors.cT3期低位直肠癌:预后因素分析
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2022 Apr;13(2):672-682. doi: 10.21037/jgo-22-269.
5
Concordance and survival implications of preoperative subclassification of T3 rectal cancers by depth of mesorectal invasion using a 5-mm cut-off point with endorectal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging.使用直肠内超声和磁共振成像,以5毫米为截断点,根据直肠系膜侵犯深度对T3期直肠癌进行术前亚分类的一致性及生存意义。
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2022 Apr;12(4):2356-2367. doi: 10.21037/qims-21-880.
6
Better prognostic determination of cT3 rectal cancer through measurement of distance to mesorectal fascia: A multicenter study.通过测量与直肠系膜筋膜的距离对cT3期直肠癌进行更好的预后判定:一项多中心研究
Chin J Cancer Res. 2021 Oct 31;33(5):606-615. doi: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2021.05.07.
7
Clinical significance of invasion distance relative to prognosis in pathological T3 colorectal cancer.病理T3期结直肠癌中浸润距离相对于预后的临床意义
Oncol Lett. 2019 Nov;18(5):5614-5620. doi: 10.3892/ol.2019.10913. Epub 2019 Sep 24.
8
The prognostic significance of MRI-detected extramural venous invasion, mesorectal extension, and lymph node status in clinical T3 mid-low rectal cancer.MRI 检测到的外突静脉侵犯、中低位直肠癌系膜延伸和淋巴结状态对临床 T3 期直肠癌的预后意义。
Sci Rep. 2019 Aug 29;9(1):12523. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-47466-0.
9
Clinical significance of the EMD/mesorectum ratio of T3 mid-low rectal cancer: A retrospective observational study.T3期低位直肠癌的直肠系膜被膜/直肠系膜比率的临床意义:一项回顾性观察研究
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Nov;97(48):e13468. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013468.
10
Long-term outcomes of surgery alone versus surgery following preoperative chemoradiotherapy for early T3 rectal cancer: A propensity score analysis.早期T3直肠癌单纯手术与术前放化疗后手术的长期疗效:一项倾向评分分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Mar;96(12):e6362. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006362.