Centre of Genomics and Policy, Department of Human Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
OMICS. 2011 Apr;15(4):221-5. doi: 10.1089/omi.2011.0007.
Recent developments in our ability to capture, curate, and analyze data, the field of data-intensive science (DIS), have indeed made these interesting and challenging times for scientific practice as well as policy making in real time. We are confronted with immense datasets that challenge our ability to pool, transfer, analyze, or interpret scientific observations. We have more data available than ever before, yet more questions to be answered as well, and no clear path to answer them. We are excited by the potential for science-based solutions to humankind's problems, yet stymied by the limitations of our current cyberinfrastructure and existing public policies. Importantly, DIS signals a transformation of the hypothesis-driven tradition of science ("first hypothesize, then experiment") to one that is typified by "first experiment, then hypothesize" mode of discovery. Another hallmark of DIS is that it amasses data that are public goods (i.e., creates a "commons") that can further be creatively mined for various applications in different sectors. As such, this calls for a science policy vision that is long term. We herein reflect on how best to approach to policy making at this critical inflection point when DIS applications are being diversified in agriculture, ecology, marine biology, and environmental research internationally. This article outlines the key policy issues and gaps that emerged from the multidisciplinary discussions at the NSF-funded DIS workshop held at the Seattle Children's Research Institute in Seattle, on September 19-20, 2010.
近年来,我们在数据捕获、管理和分析方面的能力不断提高,数据密集型科学(Data-Intensive Science,DIS)领域确实为科学实践以及实时政策制定带来了充满挑战的有趣时代。我们面临着巨大的数据集,这些数据集挑战着我们汇集、转移、分析或解释科学观测的能力。我们拥有比以往任何时候都更多的数据,但需要回答的问题也更多,而且没有明确的答案途径。我们对基于科学的解决方案解决人类问题的潜力感到兴奋,但受到我们当前网络基础设施和现有公共政策的限制。重要的是,DIS 标志着科学的假设驱动传统(“先假设,后实验”)向以“先实验,后假设”的发现模式为特征的转变。DIS 的另一个特点是它积累了公共数据(即创建“公共资源”),这些数据可以进一步用于不同部门的各种应用进行创造性挖掘。因此,这需要一种长期的科学政策愿景。我们在此反思,在 DIS 应用在农业、生态学、海洋生物学和环境研究等领域多样化的这个关键时刻,如何最好地开展政策制定工作。本文概述了 2010 年 9 月 19 日至 20 日在西雅图儿童研究所举行的由 NSF 资助的 DIS 研讨会的多学科讨论中出现的关键政策问题和差距。