Suppr超能文献

远隔缺血预处理的心脏保护作用表现出与局部缺血预处理不同的信号模式。

Cardioprotection by remote ischemic preconditioning exhibits a signaling pattern different from local ischemic preconditioning.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Duesseldorf University Hospital, Germany.

出版信息

Shock. 2011 Jul;36(1):45-53. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0b013e31821d8e77.

Abstract

Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) and local ischemic preconditioning (IPC) protect the myocardium from subsequent ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury. In this study, the protective effects of early RIPC, IPC, and the combination of both (RIPC-IPC) were characterized. Furthermore, the hypothesis was tested that protein kinase C (PKC) and mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs), important mediators of IPC, are activated in RIPC. Infarct size, serum troponin T, and creatine kinase levels were assessed after 4 × 5-min noninvasive RIPC, local IPC, or a combination of both and 35 min of regional ischemia and 120 min of reperfusion. Protein kinase C ε and the MAPKs extracellular signal-regulated MAPK (ERK), c-jun N-terminal kinase (JNK), and p38 MAPK were analyzed by Western blot analysis and activity assays in the myocardium and skeletal muscle immediately after the preconditioning protocol. Remote ischemic preconditioning, IPC, and RIPC-IPC significantly reduced myocardial infarct size (RIPC-I/R: 54% ± 15%; IPC-I/R: 33% ± 15%; RIPC-IPC-I/R: 33% ± 15%; P < 0.05 vs. I/R [76% ± 14%]) and troponin T release (RIPC-I/R: 15.4 ± 6.4 ng/mL; IPC-I/R: 10.9 ± 7.0 ng/mL; RIPC-IPC-I/R: 9.8 ± 5.6 ng/mL; P < 0.05 vs. I/R [27.1 ± 12.0 ng/mL]) after myocardial I/R. Ischemic preconditioning led to an activation of PKCε and ERK 1/2, whereas RIPC did not lead to a translocation of PKCε to the mitochondria or phosphorylation of the MAPKs ERK 1/2, JNK 1/2, and p38 MAPK. Remote ischemic preconditioning did not induce translocation of PKCε to the mitochondria or phosphorylation of MAPKs in the preconditioned muscle tissue. Remote ischemic preconditioning, IPC, and RIPC-IPC exert early protection against myocardial I/R injury. Remote ischemic preconditioning and local IPC exhibit different activation dynamics of signal transducers in the myocardium. The studied PKC-MAPK pathway is likely not involved in the protective effects of RIPC.

摘要

远程缺血预处理(RIPC)和局部缺血预处理(IPC)可保护心肌免受随后的缺血/再灌注(I/R)损伤。在这项研究中,对早期 RIPC、IPC 和两者结合(RIPC-IPC)的保护作用进行了特征描述。此外,还测试了这样一个假设,即 IPC 中的重要介质蛋白激酶 C(PKC)和丝裂原激活的蛋白激酶(MAPKs)在 RIPC 中被激活。在 4×5 分钟非侵入性 RIPC、局部 IPC 或两者结合以及 35 分钟区域缺血和 120 分钟再灌注后,评估了梗死面积、血清肌钙蛋白 T 和肌酸激酶水平。通过 Western blot 分析和心肌和骨骼肌中的活性测定,分析了蛋白激酶 Cε 和 MAPKs 细胞外信号调节的 MAPK(ERK)、c-jun N-末端激酶(JNK)和 p38 MAPK,在预处理方案后立即进行分析。远程缺血预处理、IPC 和 RIPC-IPC 显著减少心肌梗死面积(RIPC-I/R:54%±15%;IPC-I/R:33%±15%;RIPC-IPC-I/R:33%±15%;P<0.05 与 I/R[76%±14%]相比)和肌钙蛋白 T 释放(RIPC-I/R:15.4±6.4ng/mL;IPC-I/R:10.9±7.0ng/mL;RIPC-IPC-I/R:9.8±5.6ng/mL;P<0.05 与 I/R[27.1±12.0ng/mL]相比)后心肌 I/R。缺血预处理导致 PKCε 和 ERK 1/2 的激活,而 RIPC 未导致 PKCε 向线粒体易位或 MAPKs ERK 1/2、JNK 1/2 和 p38 MAPK 的磷酸化。远程缺血预处理不会诱导 PKCε 向预处理肌肉组织中的线粒体易位或 MAPKs 的磷酸化。远程缺血预处理、IPC 和 RIPC-IPC 对心肌 I/R 损伤具有早期保护作用。远程缺血预处理和局部 IPC 在心肌中表现出不同的信号转导激活动力学。研究中的 PKC-MAPK 途径可能不参与 RIPC 的保护作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验