Suppr超能文献

呋喃唑酮、阿莫西林和奥美拉唑联合或不联合铋剂用于根除消化性溃疡疾病中的幽门螺杆菌。

Furazolidone, amoxicillin and omeprazole with or without bismuth for eradication of Helicobacter pylori in peptic ulcer disease.

作者信息

Ghadir M R, Shafaghi A, Iranikhah A, Pakdin A, Joukar F, Mansour-Ghanaei F

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Qum University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

出版信息

Turk J Gastroenterol. 2011 Feb;22(1):1-5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Furazolidone has been introduced as an effective drug against Helicobacter pylori infection in Iran, but intolerable side effects may limit its use. The aim of this study was to compare quadruple and triple furazolidone-based regimens to achieve an economically affordable regimen with acceptable success rate and fewer side effects.

METHODS

Patients with Helicobacter pylori positive peptic ulcer disease were randomly allocated into two groups: amoxicillin 1 g b.i.d., furazolidone 200 mg b.i.d. and omeprazole 20 mg b.i.d. with or without bismuth subcitrate 240 mg b.i.d. for two weeks (amoxicillin, furazolidone, omeprazole, bismuth and amoxicillin, furazolidone, omeprazole regimens, respectively). Helicobacter pylori eradication was confirmed by 13C-urea breath test 12 weeks after the end of therapy.

RESULTS

Eighty-six patients were enrolled, but 16 patients discontinued their therapy or follow-up. The eradication rates with amoxicillin, furazolidone, omeprazole, bismuth and amoxicillin, furazolidone, omeprazole were 85.3% and 61.1% by per-protocol analysis, respectively (p=0.02) and 67.4% and 51.2% by intention-to-treat analysis, respectively (p<0.05). The most frequent adverse effects in the two study groups were weakness, nausea, anorexia, and dizziness, and no significant differences between the groups were shown.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the results in this study, furazolidone-based triple therapy (without bismuth) is not recommended for Helicobacter pylori eradication because of the lower eradication rate and unchanged frequency of adverse effects. Thus, we recommend furazolidone, amoxicillin and omeprazole in combination with bismuth for treatment of Helicobacter pylori.

摘要

背景/目的:在伊朗,呋喃唑酮已被用作治疗幽门螺杆菌感染的有效药物,但难以耐受的副作用可能会限制其使用。本研究的目的是比较基于呋喃唑酮的四联和三联疗法,以获得一种经济实惠、成功率可接受且副作用较少的治疗方案。

方法

幽门螺杆菌阳性消化性溃疡病患者被随机分为两组:阿莫西林1g,每日两次;呋喃唑酮200mg,每日两次;奥美拉唑20mg,每日两次,联合或不联合枸橼酸铋钾240mg,每日两次,治疗两周(分别为阿莫西林、呋喃唑酮、奥美拉唑、铋剂方案和阿莫西林、呋喃唑酮、奥美拉唑方案)。治疗结束12周后通过13C-尿素呼气试验确认幽门螺杆菌根除情况。

结果

86例患者入组,但16例患者中断治疗或随访。按符合方案分析,阿莫西林、呋喃唑酮、奥美拉唑、铋剂方案和阿莫西林、呋喃唑酮、奥美拉唑方案的根除率分别为85.3%和61.1%(p=0.02);按意向性分析,分别为67.4%和51.2%(p<0.05)。两个研究组中最常见的不良反应为乏力、恶心、厌食和头晕,两组之间无显著差异。

结论

基于本研究结果,不推荐使用基于呋喃唑酮的三联疗法(不含铋剂)根除幽门螺杆菌,因为其根除率较低且不良反应发生率未变。因此,我们推荐呋喃唑酮、阿莫西林和奥美拉唑联合铋剂治疗幽门螺杆菌。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验