• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

七日五联疗法作为幽门螺杆菌根除的挽救治疗方法。

Seven-day quintuple regimen as a rescue therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication.

作者信息

Mansour-Ghanaei Fariborz, Joukar Farahnaz, Naghipour Mohammad Reza, Forouhari Atena, Saadat Seyed Mohammad Seyed

机构信息

Fariborz Mansour-Ghanaei, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases Research Center, Razi Hospital, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht 41448-95655, Iran.

出版信息

World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jan 14;21(2):661-6. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i2.661.

DOI:10.3748/wjg.v21.i2.661
PMID:25593496
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4292302/
Abstract

AIM

To determine the efficacy of two quintuple regimens for eradication of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) in patients who failed previous therapies.

METHODS

This prospective, open-label, randomized controlled trial was a phase II study conducted from April 2011 to March 2012 at the Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases Research Center in Rasht, Iran. A total of 208 patients with dyspepsia who failed previous H. pylori eradication with a ten-day quadruple therapy were enrolled. A random block method was used to assign patients to one of two treatment groups. Patients in the first group were treated with 240 mg bismuth subcitrate, 20 mg omeprazole, 1000 mg amoxicillin, 500 mg clarithromycin and 500 mg tinidazole (BOACT group). Patients in the second group received a regimen containing 240 mg bismuth subcitrate, 20 mg omeprazole, 500 mg tetracycline, 500 mg metronidazole and 200 mg ofloxacin (BOTMO group). Both regimens were given twice daily for a duration of seven days. The eradication was confirmed by a (14)C urea breath test 12 wk after completion of therapy. Patient compliance and drug side effects were evaluated at the end of the treatment period. The success rates were calculated by intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 205 patients completed the course of treatment, with three patients excluded due to drug intolerance. The mean age of patients did not differ between the BOACT and BOTMO groups (41.6 ± 12.2 years vs 39.6 ± 11.8 years), and no significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of age, sex, smoking habits or the initial eradication regimen. The intention-to-treat and per-protocol eradication rates were significantly higher in the BOTMO group (86.5%, 95%CI: 0.85-0.87 and 86.7%, 95%CI: 0.80-0.89, respectively) compared with the BOACT group (75.5%, 95%CI: 0.73-0.76 and 76%, 95%CI: 0.69-0.80, respectively) (P < 0.05). Univariate analyses for both groups did not show any association of sex, smoking and initial therapeutic regimen with eradiation rate (P > 0.05 for all). Significantly more patients experienced side effects in the BOACT group compared to the BOTMO group (77.4% vs 36.6%, P < 0.01). This difference was exemplified by increases in headache and taste disturbance (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Quintuple therapy with a BOTMO regimen is an alternative second-line rescue therapy for Iranian patients with failed first-line eradication treatment of H. pylori.

摘要

目的

确定两种五联疗法对先前治疗失败的幽门螺杆菌(H. pylori)感染患者的根除疗效。

方法

这项前瞻性、开放标签、随机对照试验是一项II期研究,于2011年4月至2012年3月在伊朗拉什特的胃肠和肝病研究中心进行。共有208例消化不良患者入组,这些患者先前接受为期10天的四联疗法根除幽门螺杆菌失败。采用随机区组法将患者分配到两个治疗组之一。第一组患者接受240mg枸橼酸铋、20mg奥美拉唑、1000mg阿莫西林、500mg克拉霉素和500mg替硝唑治疗(BOACT组)。第二组患者接受含240mg枸橼酸铋、20mg奥美拉唑、500mg四环素、500mg甲硝唑和200mg氧氟沙星的治疗方案(BOTMO组)。两种方案均每日给药两次,疗程为7天。治疗结束12周后通过(14)C尿素呼气试验确认根除情况。在治疗期结束时评估患者的依从性和药物副作用。通过意向性分析和符合方案分析计算成功率。

结果

共有205例患者完成治疗疗程,3例因药物不耐受被排除。BOACT组和BOTMO组患者的平均年龄无差异(分别为41.6±12.2岁和39.6±11.8岁),两组在年龄、性别、吸烟习惯或初始根除方案方面均未发现显著差异。与BOACT组(意向性分析和符合方案分析的根除率分别为75.5%,95%CI:0.73 - 0.76和76%,95%CI:0.69 - 0.80)相比,BOTMO组的意向性分析和符合方案分析的根除率显著更高(分别为86.5%,95%CI:0.85 - 0.87和86.7%,95%CI:0.80 - 0.89)(P<0.05)。两组的单因素分析均未显示性别、吸烟和初始治疗方案与根除率有任何关联(所有P>0.05)。与BOTMO组相比,BOACT组有更多患者出现副作用(77.4%对36.6%,P<0.01)。这种差异在头痛和味觉障碍的增加方面得到体现(P<0.05)。

结论

对于伊朗幽门螺杆菌一线根除治疗失败的患者,BOTMO方案的五联疗法是一种替代性的二线挽救疗法。

相似文献

1
Seven-day quintuple regimen as a rescue therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication.七日五联疗法作为幽门螺杆菌根除的挽救治疗方法。
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jan 14;21(2):661-6. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i2.661.
2
Fourteen- vs seven-day bismuth-based quadruple therapy for second-line Helicobacter pylori eradication.用于二线根除幽门螺杆菌的铋剂四联疗法:十四天与七天对比
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jul 14;21(26):8132-9. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i26.8132.
3
Moxifloxacin-containing triple therapy after non-bismuth quadruple therapy failure for Helicobacter pylori infection.含莫西沙星的三联疗法用于幽门螺杆菌感染经非铋剂四联疗法失败后的治疗
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Dec 14;21(46):13124-31. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i46.13124.
4
Comparison of sequential and standard triple-drug regimen for Helicobacter pylori eradication: a 14-day, open-label, randomized, prospective, parallel-arm study in adult patients with nonulcer dyspepsia.序贯疗法与标准三联疗法根除幽门螺杆菌的比较:一项针对非溃疡性消化不良成年患者的14天开放标签随机前瞻性平行组研究。
Clin Ther. 2008 Mar;30(3):528-34. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.03.009.
5
Efficacy of moxifloxacin-based sequential and hybrid therapy for first-line Helicobacter pylori eradication.基于莫西沙星的序贯和联合疗法用于一线根除幽门螺杆菌的疗效
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Sep 21;21(35):10234-41. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i35.10234.
6
Helicobacter pylori first-line and rescue treatments in the presence of penicillin allergy.幽门螺杆菌在存在青霉素过敏的情况下的一线和挽救治疗。
Dig Dis Sci. 2015 Feb;60(2):458-64. doi: 10.1007/s10620-014-3365-2. Epub 2014 Sep 19.
7
Hybrid vs sequential therapy for eradication of Helicobacter pylori in Taiwan: A prospective randomized trial.台湾地区根除幽门螺杆菌的混合疗法与序贯疗法:一项前瞻性随机试验
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Sep 28;21(36):10435-42. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i36.10435.
8
Efficacy of 14-d vs 7-d moxifloxacin-based triple regimens for second-line Helicobacter pylori eradication.基于莫西沙星的14天与7天三联疗法用于二线根除幽门螺杆菌的疗效
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 May 14;21(18):5568-74. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i18.5568.
9
Bismuth-based quadruple therapy following H. pylori eradication failures: a multicenter study in clinical practice.幽门螺杆菌根除失败后铋剂四联疗法:一项临床实践中的多中心研究
J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2017 Sep;26(3):225-229. doi: 10.15403/jgld.2014.1121.263.zul.
10
Pylera and sequential therapy for first-line Helicobacter pylori eradication: a culture-based study in real clinical practice.用于一线根除幽门螺杆菌的Pylera和序贯疗法:一项基于实际临床实践的培养研究
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Jun;30(6):621-625. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000001102.

引用本文的文献

1
Update on the second-line treatment of infection: a narrative review.感染二线治疗的最新进展:一篇叙述性综述。
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2023 Sep 4;16:17562848231192750. doi: 10.1177/17562848231192750. eCollection 2023.
2
Evidence based guidelines for the treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection in Korea 2020.韩国 2020 年幽门螺杆菌感染治疗的循证指南。
Korean J Intern Med. 2021 Jul;36(4):807-838. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2020.701. Epub 2021 Jun 8.
3
Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for peptic ulcer disease 2020.2020 年消化性溃疡病循证临床实践指南。
J Gastroenterol. 2021 Apr;56(4):303-322. doi: 10.1007/s00535-021-01769-0. Epub 2021 Feb 23.
4
Evidence-Based Guidelines for the Treatment of Infection in Korea 2020.2020 年韩国感染治疗循证指南。
Gut Liver. 2021 Mar 15;15(2):168-195. doi: 10.5009/gnl20288.
5
Eradication of in Iran: A Review.伊朗的根除:一项综述。
Middle East J Dig Dis. 2018 Jan;10(1):5-17. doi: 10.15171/mejdd.2017.84. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
6
Clarithromycin versus Gemifloxacin in Quadruple Therapeutic Regimens for Infection Eradication.克拉霉素与吉米沙星在四联治疗方案中根除感染的比较。
Middle East J Dig Dis. 2017 Apr;9(2):100-106. doi: 10.15171/mejdd.2017.58.
7
Novel and Effective Therapeutic Regimens for in an Era of Increasing Antibiotic Resistance.抗生素耐药性不断增加的时代下针对[具体病症,原文缺失]的新型有效治疗方案
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2017 May 5;7:168. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00168. eCollection 2017.

本文引用的文献

1
Morphological and Bactericidal Effects of Different Antibiotics on Helicobacter pylori.不同抗生素对幽门螺杆菌的形态学及杀菌作用
Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2014 Jan;7(1):e8704. doi: 10.5812/jjm.8704. Epub 2014 Jan 1.
2
Global eradication rates for Helicobacter pylori infection: systematic review and meta-analysis of sequential therapy.全球幽门螺杆菌感染的根除率:序贯疗法的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2013 Aug 7;347:f4587. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f4587.
3
H. pylori Eradication Therapy.幽门螺杆菌根除疗法
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2013;2013:935635. doi: 10.1155/2013/935635. Epub 2013 Feb 21.
4
Quadruple therapy for eradication of Helicobacter pylori.四联疗法根除幽门螺杆菌。
World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Feb 14;19(6):931-5. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i6.931.
5
Randomized control trial: Comparison of Triple Therapy plus Probiotic Yogurt vs. Standard Triple Therapy on Helicobacter Pylori Eradication.随机对照试验:三联疗法加益生菌酸奶与标准三联疗法根除幽门螺杆菌的比较。
Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2012 Oct;14(10):657-66. Epub 2012 Oct 30.
6
Assessment of cagE and babA mRNA expression during morphological conversion of Helicobacter pylori from spiral to coccoid.评估幽门螺旋杆菌从螺旋形到球形形态转换过程中 cagE 和 babA mRNA 的表达。
Curr Microbiol. 2013 Apr;66(4):406-13. doi: 10.1007/s00284-012-0280-7. Epub 2012 Dec 24.
7
Rifaximin Plus Levofloxacin-Based Rescue Regimen for the Eradication of Helicobacter pylori.利福昔明联合左氧氟沙星补救方案根除幽门螺杆菌。
Gut Liver. 2012 Oct;6(4):452-6. doi: 10.5009/gnl.2012.6.4.452. Epub 2012 Oct 18.
8
Comparison of hybrid and sequential therapies for Helicobacter pylori eradication in Iran: a prospective randomized trial.伊朗幽门螺杆菌根除中杂交与序贯疗法的比较:一项前瞻性随机试验。
Helicobacter. 2013 Apr;18(2):129-34. doi: 10.1111/hel.12017. Epub 2012 Nov 4.
9
The Optimal First-Line Therapy of Helicobacter pylori Infection in Year 2012.2012 年幽门螺杆菌感染的最佳一线治疗。
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2012;2012:168361. doi: 10.1155/2012/168361. Epub 2012 Jun 27.
10
Helicobacter  pylori Eradication Therapies in the Era of Increasing Antibiotic Resistance: A Paradigm Shift to Improved Efficacy.在抗生素耐药性日益增加的时代,幽门螺杆菌根除疗法:提高疗效的范式转变。
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2012;2012:757926. doi: 10.1155/2012/757926. Epub 2012 Jun 19.