Suppr超能文献

利妥昔单抗治疗淋巴瘤患者的感染风险:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Risk of infection in patients with lymphoma receiving rituximab: systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

National Institute for Infectious Diseases, INMI-Lazzaro Spallanzani Via Portuense, 292 00149 Rome, Italy.

出版信息

BMC Med. 2011 Apr 12;9:36. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-9-36.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The addition of Rituximab (R) to standard chemotherapy (C) has been reported to improve the end of treatment outcome in patients affected by CD-20 positive malignant lymphomas (CD20+ ML). Nevertheless, given the profound and prolonged immunosuppression produced by R there are concerns that severe infections may arise. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to determine whether or not the addition of R to C may increase the risk of severe infections in adults undergoing induction therapy for CD20+ ML.

METHODS

Only randomised controlled trials comparing R-C to C standard alone in adult patients with CD20+ ML were included. Meta-analysis was performed on overall incidence of severe infection, risk of dying as the consequence of infection, risk of febrile neutropenia, risk of severe leucopenia, risk of severe granulocytopenia and overall response assuming a fixed effect model. Heterogeneity was investigated, if present and I2 >20%, according to several predefined baseline characteristics of the study populations.

RESULTS

Several relevant results have emerged. First, the addition of R to standard C does not increase the overall risk of severe infections (RR = 1.00; 95% CI 0.87 to 1.14) nor does it increase the risk of dying as a consequence of infection (RR = 1.60; 95% CI 0.68 to 3.75). Second, we confirmed that the addition of R to standard C increases the proportion of overall response (RR = 1.12; 95% CI 1.09 to 1.15), but it also increases the risk of severe leucopenia (RR = 1.24; 95% CI 1.12 to 1.37) and granulocytopenia (RR = 1.07; 95% CI 1.02 to 1.12).

CONCLUSIONS

R-C is superior to standard C in terms of overall response and it does not increase the overall incidence of severe infection. However, data on special groups of patients (for example, HIV positive subjects and HBV carriers) are lacking. In our opinion more studies are needed to explore the potential effect of R on silent and chronic viral infections.

摘要

背景

利妥昔单抗(R)联合标准化疗(C)已被报道可改善 CD-20 阳性恶性淋巴瘤(CD20+ML)患者的治疗结束时的结果。然而,由于 R 产生的深度和长期免疫抑制,人们担心可能会出现严重感染。进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,以确定 R 联合 C 是否会增加接受 CD20+ML 诱导治疗的成年人发生严重感染的风险。

方法

仅纳入比较 R-C 与 C 标准治疗在 CD20+ML 成人患者中的随机对照试验。采用固定效应模型对总体严重感染发生率、因感染而死亡的风险、发热性中性粒细胞减少症的风险、严重白细胞减少症的风险、严重粒细胞减少症的风险和总体反应进行荟萃分析。如果存在异质性且 I2>20%,则根据研究人群的几个预设基线特征进行调查。

结果

出现了一些相关结果。首先,R 联合标准 C 不会增加严重感染的总体风险(RR=1.00;95%CI 0.87 至 1.14),也不会增加因感染而死亡的风险(RR=1.60;95%CI 0.68 至 3.75)。其次,我们证实 R 联合标准 C 增加了总体反应的比例(RR=1.12;95%CI 1.09 至 1.15),但也增加了严重白细胞减少症(RR=1.24;95%CI 1.12 至 1.37)和粒细胞减少症(RR=1.07;95%CI 1.02 至 1.12)的风险。

结论

R-C 在总体反应方面优于标准 C,且不会增加严重感染的总体发生率。然而,缺乏针对特殊患者群体(例如 HIV 阳性患者和 HBV 携带者)的数据。在我们看来,需要进行更多的研究来探讨 R 对潜伏和慢性病毒感染的潜在影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e6a/3094236/6ddeb2a4c878/1741-7015-9-36-1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验