Suppr超能文献

[心因性非癫痫性发作:综述]

[Psychogenic non epileptic seizures: a review].

作者信息

Auxéméry Y, Hubsch C, Fidelle G

机构信息

Service de psychiatrie et de psychologie clinique, hôpital d'instruction des armées Legouest, 27, avenue de Plantières, BP 90001, 57070 Metz cedex 3, France.

出版信息

Encephale. 2011 Apr;37(2):153-8. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2010.04.009. Epub 2010 Jul 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This paper summarizes the recent literature on the phenomena of psychogenic non epileptic seizures (PNES). DEFINITION AND EPIDEMIOLOGY: PNES are, as altered movement, sensation or experience, similar to epilepsy, but caused by a psychological process. Although in the ICD-10, PNES belong to the group of dissociative disorders, they are classified as somatoform disorders in the DSM-IV. That represents a challenging diagnosis: the mean latency between manifestations and diagnosis remains as long as 7 years. It has been estimated that between 10 and 30% of patients referred to epilepsy centers have paroxysmal events that despite looking like epileptic episodes are in fact non-epileptic. Many pseudo epileptic seizures have received the wrong diagnosis of epilepsy being treated with anticonvulsants. The prevalence of epilepsy in PNES patients is higher than in the general population and epilepsy may be a risk factor for PNES. It has been considered that 65 to 80% of PNES patients are young females but a new old men subgroup has been recently described. POSITIVE DIAGNOSIS AND PSYCHIATRIC COMORBIDITIES: Even if clinical characteristics of seizures were defined as important in the diagnosis algorithm, this point of view could be inadequate because of its lack of sensitivity. Because neuron-specific enolase, prolactin and creatine kinase are not reliable and able to validate the diagnosis, video electroencephalography monitoring (with or without provocative techniques) is currently the gold standard for the differential diagnosis of ES, and PNES patients with pseudoseizures have high rates of psychiatric disorders such as depression, anxiety, somatoform symptoms, dissociative disorders and post-traumatic stress disorder. We found evidence for correlations between childhood trauma, history of childhood abuse, PTSD, and PNES diagnoses. PNES could also be hypothesized of a dissociative phenomena generated by childhood trauma.

PATHOPHYSIOLOGY

Some authors report that PNES can be associated with a physical brain disorder playing a role in their development: head injury may contribute to the pathogenesis of PNES. New-onset psychogenic seizures after resective epilepsy surgery or other intracranial neurosurgery have been described. Recent studies found psychogenic seizure disorders associated with brain pathology in the right hemisphere, non specific interictal electroencephalography abnormalities, magnetic resonance imaging changes and neuropsychological deficits. However, complex partial seizures of frontal origin might present similar characteristics with PNES and could be confused with the latter.

PROGNOSIS AND TREATMENT

There is actually no clear agreement as the best treatment plan for PNES patients. The PNES diagnosis has to be clearly communicated to the patient. Nevertheless, even after a correct diagnosis is made a high proportion of PNES patients continue to have seizures, serious disability and bad self-reported quality of life. Furthermore, seizure remission cannot be considered a comprehensive measure of medical or psychosocial outcome. Nearly half of the patients who become seizure free remain unproductive and many of these patients continue to have symptoms of psychopathology including other somatoform, depressive, and anxiety disorders. Even if psychiatric comorbidities have to be treated by a psychiatrist? who could also suggest a psychotherapy, in all cases the importance of a neurologist continuing to follow post-diagnosis PNES patients is essential.

CONCLUSIONS

PNES is a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge that is costly to patients and to society at large. Further studies are needed to understand this dissociative psychiatric disorder and to propose therapeutic guidelines.

摘要

目的

本文总结了近期关于心因性非癫痫性发作(PNES)现象的文献。

定义与流行病学

PNES表现为运动、感觉或体验的改变,与癫痫相似,但由心理过程引起。尽管在国际疾病分类第10版(ICD - 10)中,PNES属于分离性障碍组,但在《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM - IV)中它们被归类为躯体形式障碍。这是一个具有挑战性的诊断:从症状出现到诊断的平均延迟长达7年。据估计,转诊至癫痫中心的患者中,有10%至30%的阵发性事件尽管看似癫痫发作,但实际上是非癫痫性的。许多假性癫痫发作被误诊为癫痫并接受了抗惊厥药物治疗。PNES患者中癫痫的患病率高于普通人群,癫痫可能是PNES的一个危险因素。曾有人认为65%至80%的PNES患者为年轻女性,但最近描述了一个老年男性亚组。

阳性诊断与精神共病

即使癫痫发作的临床特征在诊断算法中被定义为重要因素,但由于其缺乏敏感性,这种观点可能并不充分。因为神经元特异性烯醇化酶、催乳素和肌酸激酶并不可靠,无法用于确诊,目前视频脑电图监测(无论是否采用激发技术)是癫痫(ES)鉴别诊断的金标准,有假性发作的PNES患者患有诸如抑郁症、焦虑症、躯体形式症状、分离性障碍和创伤后应激障碍等高比例的精神疾病。我们发现童年创伤、童年虐待史以及创伤后应激障碍与PNES诊断之间存在关联证据。PNES也可能被认为是由童年创伤引发的一种分离现象。

病理生理学

一些作者报告称,PNES可能与一种在其发病过程中起作用的脑部器质性疾病相关:头部受伤可能促使PNES的发病机制。有人描述了在切除性癫痫手术或其他颅内神经外科手术后出现的新发心因性发作。近期研究发现心因性发作障碍与右侧半球的脑部病变、非特异性发作间期脑电图异常、磁共振成像改变以及神经心理学缺陷有关。然而,额叶起源的复杂部分性发作可能呈现与PNES相似的特征,并可能与后者混淆。

预后与治疗

目前对于PNES患者的最佳治疗方案尚无明确共识。必须将PNES诊断清晰地告知患者。然而,即便做出了正确诊断,仍有很大比例的PNES患者继续发作,存在严重残疾且自我报告的生活质量较差。此外,癫痫发作缓解不能被视为衡量医疗或心理社会结局的全面指标。近一半癫痫发作停止的患者仍无工作能力且许多此类患者继续存在精神病理学症状,包括其他躯体形式、抑郁和焦虑障碍。即使精神共病必须由精神科医生治疗,精神科医生也可建议进行心理治疗,但在所有情况下,神经科医生在诊断后继续跟踪PNES患者至关重要。

结论

PNES是一项诊断和治疗挑战,对患者及整个社会而言成本高昂。需要进一步研究以了解这种分离性精神障碍并提出治疗指南。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验