• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国原发性闭角型青光眼和原发性开角型青光眼患者眼反应分析仪参数的比较。

Comparison of ocular response analyzer parameters in chinese subjects with primary angle-closure and primary open-angle glaucoma.

作者信息

Narayanaswamy Arun, Su Daniel H, Baskaran Mani, Tan Anna C S, Nongpiur Monisha E, Htoon Hla M, Wong Tien Y, Aung Tin

机构信息

Glaucoma Service, Singapore National Eye Centre, 11 Third Hospital Ave, Singapore.

出版信息

Arch Ophthalmol. 2011 Apr;129(4):429-34. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2011.60.

DOI:10.1001/archophthalmol.2011.60
PMID:21482869
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate corneal hysteresis (CH) and intraocular pressure (IOP) measured by the Ocular Response Analyzer in Chinese subjects with primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG), assess their relationship with Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) measurements, and compare this with subjects with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and normal controls.

METHODS

In this prospective observational study, consecutive subjects with PACG and POAG without prior intraocular surgery were enrolled from glaucoma clinics. Normal subjects were recruited from an ongoing population-based study. One eye of each subject underwent standardized ocular examination and IOP measurement by GAT and the Ocular Response Analyzer. Corneal hysteresis and corneal-compensated IOP were compared between groups.

RESULTS

Of the 443 subjects recruited, 131 had PACG, 162 had POAG, and 150 were normal. Corneal hysteresis was lower in PACG (9.1 mm Hg; 95% confidence interval [CI], 8.7 to 9.4 mm Hg) and POAG (9.5 mm Hg; 95% CI, 9.2 to 9.5 mm Hg) eyes compared with control eyes (10.4 mm Hg; 95% CI, 10.1 to 10.6 mm Hg; P < .001 for both), with no difference (P = .16) in CH found between PACG and POAG eyes. After adjusting for age, sex, and IOP measurement by GAT, CH persisted to be lower only in eyes with PACG in comparison with control eyes (9.4 vs 10.1 mm Hg; P = .006). Eyes with POAG had lower CH than control eyes but the difference was not statistically significant (9.6 vs 10.1 mm Hg; P = .06).

CONCLUSIONS

Corneal hysteresis was lower in eyes with glaucoma. After adjusting for age, sex, and IOP measurement by GAT, a persistently lower hysteresis was noted in eyes with PACG compared with other groups.

摘要

目的

使用眼反应分析仪评估中国原发性闭角型青光眼(PACG)患者的角膜滞后(CH)和眼压(IOP),评估它们与Goldmann压平眼压计(GAT)测量值的关系,并与原发性开角型青光眼(POAG)患者和正常对照者进行比较。

方法

在这项前瞻性观察研究中,从青光眼诊所招募了未接受过眼内手术的连续性PACG和POAG患者。正常受试者从一项正在进行的基于人群的研究中招募。每位受试者的一只眼睛接受了标准化眼科检查,并通过GAT和眼反应分析仪测量眼压。比较各组之间的角膜滞后和角膜补偿眼压。

结果

在招募的443名受试者中,131例患有PACG,162例患有POAG,150例为正常对照。与对照眼(10.4 mmHg;95%置信区间[CI],10.1至10.6 mmHg)相比,PACG眼(9.1 mmHg;95% CI,8.7至9.4 mmHg)和POAG眼(9.5 mmHg;95% CI,9.2至9.5 mmHg)的角膜滞后较低(两者P均<0.001),PACG眼和POAG眼之间的CH无差异(P = 0.16)。在调整年龄、性别和GAT测量的眼压后,与对照眼相比,仅PACG眼的CH持续较低(9.4 vs 10.1 mmHg;P = 0.006)。POAG眼的CH低于对照眼,但差异无统计学意义(9.6 vs 10.1 mmHg;P = 0.06)。

结论

青光眼患者的角膜滞后较低。在调整年龄、性别和GAT测量的眼压后,与其他组相比,PACG眼的滞后持续较低。

相似文献

1
Comparison of ocular response analyzer parameters in chinese subjects with primary angle-closure and primary open-angle glaucoma.中国原发性闭角型青光眼和原发性开角型青光眼患者眼反应分析仪参数的比较。
Arch Ophthalmol. 2011 Apr;129(4):429-34. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2011.60.
2
Diagnostic Efficacy of Normalization of Corneal Deformation Variables by the Intraocular Pressure in Glaucomatous Eyes.眼压对青光眼患者角膜变形变量进行标准化处理的诊断效能
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016 Mar;57(3):1082-6. doi: 10.1167/iovs.15-18569.
3
Relationship between corneal biomechanical properties, central corneal thickness, and intraocular pressure across the spectrum of glaucoma.青光眼各阶段的角膜生物力学特性、中央角膜厚度与眼内压的关系。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2012 May;153(5):840-849.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2011.10.032. Epub 2012 Feb 4.
4
Corneal viscoelastic differences between pseudoexfoliative glaucoma and primary open-angle glaucoma.原发性开角型青光眼与假性剥脱性青光眼的角膜粘弹特性差异。
J Glaucoma. 2013 Dec;22(9):740-5. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000036.
5
Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties with the Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer.使用Reichert眼反应分析仪评估角膜生物力学特性。
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2011 Mar-Apr;21(2):138-48. doi: 10.5301/ejo.2010.2150.
6
Corneal biomechanical properties affect Goldmann applanation tonometry in primary open-angle glaucoma.角膜生物力学特性影响原发性开角型青光眼的 Goldmann 压平眼压测量。
J Glaucoma. 2014 Feb;23(2):69-74. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e318269804b.
7
Central corneal thickness in Chinese subjects with primary angle closure glaucoma.中国原发性闭角型青光眼患者的中央角膜厚度。
J Glaucoma. 2011 Sep;20(7):401-4. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181f3e5d9.
8
Comparison of the corneal biomechanical properties with the Ocular Response Analyzer® (ORA) in African and Caucasian normal subjects and patients with glaucoma.比较非洲裔和白种人正常受试者以及青光眼患者的角膜生物力学特性与眼反应分析仪(ORA)的结果。
Acta Ophthalmol. 2012 Mar;90(2):e118-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2011.02274.x. Epub 2011 Oct 11.
9
Corneal biomechanical properties in primary open angle glaucoma and normal tension glaucoma.原发性开角型青光眼和正常眼压性青光眼中的角膜生物力学特性。
J Glaucoma. 2008 Jun-Jul;17(4):259-62. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31815c3a93.
10
The Influence of Corneal Biomechanical Properties on Intraocular Pressure Measurements Using a Rebound Self-tonometer.角膜生物力学特性对回弹眼压计眼压测量的影响。
J Glaucoma. 2018 Jun;27(6):511-518. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000948.

引用本文的文献

1
Bidirectional Causal Relationships between Corneal Biomechanics and Glaucoma or Intraocular Pressure.角膜生物力学与青光眼或眼压之间的双向因果关系
Ophthalmol Sci. 2025 Feb 18;5(4):100742. doi: 10.1016/j.xops.2025.100742. eCollection 2025 Jul-Aug.
2
Changes in corneal biomechanics in patients with glaucoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.青光眼患者角膜生物力学的变化:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2024 Apr 15;24(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s12886-024-03443-4.
3
Corneal Biomechanical Measures for Glaucoma: A Clinical Approach.
青光眼的角膜生物力学测量:一种临床方法。
Bioengineering (Basel). 2023 Sep 22;10(10):1108. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10101108.
4
Corvis Biomechanical Factor Facilitates the Detection of Primary Angle Closure Glaucoma.Corvis 生物力学因素有助于原发性闭角型青光眼的检测。
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2022 Oct 3;11(10):7. doi: 10.1167/tvst.11.10.7.
5
Corneal Hysteresis, Intraocular Pressure, and Progression of Glaucoma: Time for a "Hyst-Oric" Change in Clinical Practice?角膜滞后、眼压与青光眼进展:临床实践中是时候进行“滞后性”变革了?
J Clin Med. 2022 May 20;11(10):2895. doi: 10.3390/jcm11102895.
6
Corneal Hysteresis in Thais and Variation of Corneal Hysteresis in Glaucoma.泰国人的角膜滞后现象及青光眼患者角膜滞后现象的变化
Clin Optom (Auckl). 2021 Oct 1;13:287-299. doi: 10.2147/OPTO.S324187. eCollection 2021.
7
Rate of central corneal thickness changes in primary angle closure eyes: long-term follow-up results.原发性闭角型青光眼患者中央角膜厚度变化率:长期随访结果。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2021 Mar 22;21(1):145. doi: 10.1186/s12886-021-01908-4.
8
Relationships between corneal biomechanics and the structural and functional parameters of glaucoma damage.角膜生物力学与青光眼损害的结构和功能参数之间的关系。
Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2020 Mar-Apr;83(2):132-140. doi: 10.5935/0004-2749.20200019.
9
Corneal biomechanical changes after trabeculectomy with mitomycin C in primary open-angle glaucoma and pseudoexfoliation glaucoma.原发性开角型青光眼和剥脱性青光眼小梁切除联合丝裂霉素C术后的角膜生物力学变化
Int Ophthalmol. 2019 Dec;39(12):2741-2748. doi: 10.1007/s10792-019-01118-4. Epub 2019 May 27.
10
Correlation between elastic energy stored in an eye and visual field progression in glaucoma.青光眼患者眼内弹性储能与视野进展的相关性。
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 21;13(9):e0204451. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204451. eCollection 2018.