*Department of Ophthalmology, William H. Havener Eye Institute, The Ohio State University Medical Center †Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
J Glaucoma. 2014 Feb;23(2):69-74. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e318269804b.
To study differences in corneal biomechanical properties between primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and central corneal thickness (CCT)-matched control subjects and their effect on intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement.
Thirteen eyes of 13 POAG subjects and 15 eyes of 15 normal subjects underwent corneal topography; IOP using Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT), dynamic contour tonometry (DCT), and corneal compensated IOP (IOPcc) using the Reichert ocular response analyzer (ORA); corneal hysteresis; and CCT. Results from POAG and control eyes were then compared using t tests.
Ages in the POAG group were slightly greater than that in the control group. CCT was closely matched between groups. Significant differences were found between GAT versus DCT and GAT versus IOPcc within both groups: Mean GAT IOP was not significantly different between POAG and controls, whereas mean DCT IOP did show a significant difference between groups as did mean IOPcc. The delta differences, GATΔDCT and GATΔIOPcc, were of greater magnitude in POAG subjects when compared with controls. Corneal hysteresis was significantly lower in POAG subjects.
The delta differences between GAT and newer measures of IOP are greater in magnitude in patients with POAG than in the normal controls, independent of CCT. This is likely due to differences in the corneal biomechanical properties with POAG corneas being softer than healthy corneas, which causes greater underestimation of IOP by GAT in POAG than controls. Underestimation of IOP could affect treatment decisions and outcomes in POAG.
研究原发性开角型青光眼(POAG)与中央角膜厚度(CCT)匹配的对照组之间角膜生物力学特性的差异及其对眼压(IOP)测量的影响。
对 13 例 POAG 患者的 13 只眼和 15 例正常对照者的 15 只眼进行角膜地形图、Goldmann 压平眼压计(GAT)、动态轮廓眼压计(DCT)和角膜补偿眼压(IOPcc)测量(使用 Reichert 眼反应分析仪(ORA))、角膜滞后量和 CCT。使用 t 检验比较 POAG 组和对照组的结果。
POAG 组的年龄略大于对照组。两组 CCT 匹配良好。两组内 GAT 与 DCT 及 GAT 与 IOPcc 之间均存在显著差异:POAG 组与对照组之间的平均 GAT IOP 无显著差异,而 DCT IOP 平均差异有统计学意义,IOPcc 也有统计学意义。与对照组相比,POAG 组的 GATΔDCT 和 GATΔIOPcc 差异更大。POAG 组的角膜滞后量明显降低。
与正常对照组相比,POAG 患者 GAT 与较新的 IOP 测量值之间的差异更大,与 CCT 无关。这可能是由于 POAG 角膜的生物力学特性不同,与健康角膜相比,POAG 角膜更软,导致 GAT 对 POAG 患者的眼压低估程度大于对照组。IOP 的低估可能会影响 POAG 的治疗决策和结果。