• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

轴向和斜向加载对牙种植体微动的影响。

The effect of axial and oblique loading on the micromovement of dental implants.

机构信息

Dental Clinic 2, Department of Prosthodontics, University Clinic Erlangen, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011 Mar-Apr;26(2):257-64.

PMID:21483878
Abstract

PURPOSE

To quantify implant displacement upon axial and oblique force application and compare the effects of bone quality using an in vitro experimental setup.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred ninety-two implants were inserted into artificial bone block specimens using a drill guide. Ninety-six implants were placed in soft cancellous bone and loaded in 10-N increments up to 80 N in axial and oblique (30-degree angle) directions (n = 48 in each group). The other 96 implants were inserted in dense artificial bone and loaded in axial and oblique directions in the same force increments. Three-dimensional displacement data were recorded for all implants using a noncontact optical image correlation technique based on photogrammetric principles, and the absolute displacement vector was calculated.

RESULTS

There were significant differences in the absolute implant displacement in the different bone densities over all load increments. Implant displacement was significantly higher in soft cancellous bone than in dense bone. Axial and oblique loading revealed significant differences in implant displacement in the cancellous specimens, whereas oblique loading showed increased displacement (339 ± 47 Μm at 80 N) compared to axial loading (266 ± 39 Μm at 80 N). However, axial and oblique loading showed no significant differences over all load increments when implants were inserted in dense specimens (absolute displacement with an 80-N load: 147 ± 10 Μm axial and 126 ± 17 Μm oblique).

CONCLUSIONS

Bone density influenced implant displacement. The loading character (axial versus oblique) significantly influenced implant displacement in soft cancellous bone block specimens only. However, the limitation of the measured displacement values to an in vitro application that did not represent the complexity of vital bone has to be considered.

摘要

目的

定量研究轴向和斜向受力时种植体的位移,并使用体外实验装置比较骨质量的影响。

材料与方法

将 192 个种植体使用钻头导向器插入人造骨块标本中。96 个种植体被放置在松质骨中,以 10-N 的增量加载,直到 80N 的轴向和斜向(每组 48 个)。另外 96 个种植体被插入致密人工骨中,以相同的力增量加载轴向和斜向。使用基于摄影测量原理的非接触式光学图像相关技术记录所有种植体的三维位移数据,并计算绝对位移矢量。

结果

在所有的加载增量中,不同骨密度的种植体的绝对位移存在显著差异。在松质骨中的种植体位移明显高于致密骨中的种植体位移。轴向和斜向加载在松质标本中显示出种植体位移的显著差异,而斜向加载显示出比轴向加载更高的位移(80N 时为 339 ± 47 Μm)。然而,当种植体插入致密标本时,轴向和斜向加载在所有的加载增量中没有显示出显著差异(80N 时的绝对位移:轴向为 147 ± 10 Μm,斜向为 126 ± 17 Μm)。

结论

骨密度影响种植体的位移。只有在松质骨块标本中,加载特性(轴向与斜向)才显著影响种植体的位移。然而,必须考虑到所测量的位移值仅限于体外应用,而不能代表活体骨的复杂性。

相似文献

1
The effect of axial and oblique loading on the micromovement of dental implants.轴向和斜向加载对牙种植体微动的影响。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011 Mar-Apr;26(2):257-64.
2
The effect of provisional restoration type on micromovement of implants.临时修复类型对种植体微动的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2008 Sep;100(3):173-82. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60176-6.
3
The biomechanical analysis of simulating implants in function under osteoporotic jawbone by comparing cylindrical, apical tapered, neck tapered, and expandable type implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.通过比较圆柱形、根尖锥形、颈部锥形和可扩张型种植体,对骨质疏松颌骨功能状态下模拟种植体进行生物力学分析:三维有限元分析
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Jul;69(7):e273-81. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2010.12.006. Epub 2011 Mar 1.
4
Effects of implant diameter, insertion depth, and loading angle on stress/strain fields in implant/jawbone systems: finite element analysis.种植体直径、植入深度和加载角度对种植体/颌骨系统中应力/应变场的影响:有限元分析。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009 Sep-Oct;24(5):877-86.
5
Predicting time-dependent remodeling of bone around immediately loaded dental implants with different designs.预测不同设计的即刻负载牙科种植体周围骨的时变重塑。
Med Eng Phys. 2010 Jan;32(1):22-31. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2009.10.004. Epub 2009 Nov 1.
6
Two dental implants designed for immediate loading: a finite element analysis.两种用于即刻负重的牙种植体:有限元分析
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002 May-Jun;17(3):353-62.
7
Influence of implant design and bone quality on stress/strain distribution in bone around implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.种植体设计与骨质量对种植体周围骨组织应力/应变分布的影响:三维有限元分析
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003 May-Jun;18(3):357-68.
8
Effect of mini-implant length and diameter on primary stability under loading with two force levels.加载两种力水平下微型种植体长度和直径对初始稳定性的影响。
Eur J Orthod. 2011 Aug;33(4):381-7. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjq088. Epub 2010 Nov 9.
9
Numerical simulation of the effect of time-to-loading on peri-implant bone.加载时间对种植体周围骨影响的数值模拟
Med Eng Phys. 2010 Jan;32(1):7-13. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2009.10.001. Epub 2009 Oct 27.
10
Finite element analysis of miniscrew implants used for orthodontic anchorage.微型种植体用于正畸锚固的有限元分析。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012 Apr;141(4):468-76. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.11.012.

引用本文的文献

1
Influence of Connector Design on Displacement and Micromotion in Tooth-Implant Fixed Partial Dentures Using Different Lengths and Diameters: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Study.使用不同长度和直径的牙种植体固定局部义齿中连接体设计对位移和微动的影响:一项三维有限元研究
Materials (Basel). 2024 Sep 7;17(17):4416. doi: 10.3390/ma17174416.
2
Comparative evaluation of peri-implant stress distribution in implant protected occlusion and cuspally loaded occlusion on a 3 unit implant supported fixed partial denture: A 3D finite element analysis study.3单位种植体支持的固定局部义齿中种植体保护式咬合与尖牙加载式咬合的种植体周围应力分布比较评估:一项三维有限元分析研究
J Adv Prosthodont. 2021 Apr;13(2):79-88. doi: 10.4047/jap.2021.13.2.79. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
3
Evaluation of Primary Stability of Cylindrical and Tapered Implants in Different Bone Types by Measuring Implant Displacement: An Study.通过测量种植体位移评估不同骨类型中圆柱形和锥形种植体的初期稳定性:一项研究。
Contemp Clin Dent. 2019 Jul-Sep;10(3):471-476. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_788_18.
4
Effects of implant tilting and the loading direction on the displacement and micromotion of immediately loaded implants: an experiment and finite element analysis.种植体倾斜和加载方向对即刻加载种植体位移和微动的影响:一项实验和有限元分析。
J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2017 Aug;47(4):251-262. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2017.47.4.251. Epub 2017 Aug 28.
5
Micromotion of Dental Implants: Basic Mechanical Considerations.牙种植体的微动:基本力学考量
J Med Eng. 2013;2013:265412. doi: 10.1155/2013/265412. Epub 2012 Nov 20.