Suppr超能文献

[注意缺陷多动障碍诊断中家长与教师之间的量化及一致性评估]

[Quantification and concordance assessment among parents and teachers in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder diagnosis].

作者信息

Cáceres José, Herrero David

机构信息

Facultad de Psicología, Universidad de Deusto, Pamplona, Navarra, España.

出版信息

Rev Neurol. 2011 May 1;52(9):527-35.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is the disorder with higher referral rate to child mental health community centres. Diagnostic criteria are well defined and known by trained clinicians, but they cannot observe children daily and through different settings, and must rely on information offered by multiple informants (parents, teachers...). To be considered a disorder, it must occur in more than one setting. This extra information is frequently obtained through validated questionnaires.

AIMS

To compare percentage of children considered ADHD by their context and those who do meet the criteria, after proper assessment; to assess if there are differences in ratings made by parents and teachers, and to contrast them with deficit obtained through objective tests.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

127 children referred to a Mental Health Community Centre were assessed through clinical interview, semi structured observation of family dynamics in one-way mirror room, Conners' questionnaire, filled out by parents and teachers, and WISC subscales. RESULTS. Only 46% met the criteria to be considered ADHD. Agreement between parents and teachers was low. Parents rated in similar ways boys and girls, but teachers considered boys more inatent and impulsive/hyperactive than girls.

CONCLUSIONS

Not only clearly spelled out diagnostic criteria are needed, but steps to reach diagnosis. Proposals are presented to potentiate the assessment process that permits to individualize treatment.

摘要

引言

注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)是转介至儿童心理健康社区中心比例较高的一种疾病。诊断标准明确,训练有素的临床医生也熟知这些标准,但他们无法在日常及不同场景下观察儿童,必须依赖多个信息提供者(家长、教师等)提供的信息。要被认定为一种疾病,其症状必须在不止一个场景中出现。这些额外信息通常通过经过验证的问卷来获取。

目的

比较经适当评估后,被其所处环境认为患有ADHD的儿童比例与符合标准的儿童比例;评估家长和教师的评分是否存在差异,并将其与通过客观测试得出的缺陷进行对比。

对象与方法

对转介至一家心理健康社区中心的127名儿童进行了评估,评估方式包括临床访谈、在单向镜房间对家庭动态进行半结构化观察、由家长和教师填写的康纳斯问卷以及韦氏儿童智力量表各分量表。结果:只有46%的儿童符合被认定为ADHD的标准。家长和教师之间的一致性较低。家长对男孩和女孩的评分方式相似,但教师认为男孩比女孩更注意力不集中、更冲动/多动。

结论

不仅需要明确阐述诊断标准,还需要明确诊断步骤。本文提出了一些建议,以强化评估过程,从而实现治疗的个性化。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验