• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三级保健中心的反向分期转移:行根治性前列腺切除术的男性风险增加。

Reverse stage shift at a tertiary care center: escalating risk in men undergoing radical prostatectomy.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Urology Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10065, USA.

出版信息

Cancer. 2011 Nov 1;117(21):4855-60. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26132. Epub 2011 Apr 11.

DOI:10.1002/cncr.26132
PMID:21484780
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3181272/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to evaluate changes in clinical and pathologic characteristics of prostate cancer in patients who underwent surgery at a large tertiary care center in the context of increased use of active surveillance (AS) and minimally invasive surgery (MIS).

METHODS

The authors retrospectively reviewed 6624 patients with localized prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy from 2000 to 2010 at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. Patients were stratified by surgical approach (open, laparoscopic, or robotic) and by risk category (low, intermediate, or high). Patients with low-risk disease, without intervention, and with a minimum follow-up of 6 months were considered to have elected AS.

RESULTS

The number of patients who had AS increased from <20 per year between 2000 and 2004 to ≥ 100 per year between 2007 and 2009. Over the same decade, the number of patients who underwent MIS (laparoscopic or robotic) increased from zero to 63% of all surgical cases. The percentage of patients in the intermediate-risk and high-risk categories increased over time, whereas the percentage of patients in the low-risk category decreased (odds ratio [OR] per year, 0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.89-0.92; P < .0005). The proportion of patients who underwent surgery with Gleason 6 tumors decreased over time (OR per year, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.85-0.88; P < .0005), whereas pathologic stage and Gleason score increased (P < .0005). The proportion of low-risk patients decreased across all types of surgery, and the largest decrease was observed for robotic surgery (P < .0005).

CONCLUSIONS

A reverse stage shift was observed in patients who underwent radical prostatectomy after 2000 despite the introduction and rapid proliferation of MIS. This shift may have been caused in part by the increased use of AS and an institutional focus on the treatment of higher risk disease.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估在大型三级保健中心,随着主动监测(AS)和微创外科(MIS)的广泛应用,接受手术治疗的患者的前列腺癌临床和病理特征的变化。

方法

作者回顾性分析了 2000 年至 2010 年在纪念斯隆-凯特琳癌症中心接受根治性前列腺切除术的 6624 例局限性前列腺癌患者。患者按手术方式(开放、腹腔镜或机器人)和风险类别(低、中、高)分层。对于低危疾病患者,如果不干预且随访时间至少 6 个月,则认为其选择了 AS。

结果

接受 AS 的患者人数从 2000 年至 2004 年每年不到 20 人增加到 2007 年至 2009 年每年 100 人以上。在同一十年间,接受 MIS(腹腔镜或机器人)手术的患者人数从零增加到所有手术病例的 63%。中危和高危患者的比例随时间增加,而低危患者的比例减少(每年的比值比,0.91;95%置信区间,0.89-0.92;P <.0005)。随着时间的推移,接受 Gleason 6 肿瘤手术的患者比例减少(每年的比值比,0.87;95%置信区间,0.85-0.88;P <.0005),而病理分期和 Gleason 评分增加(P <.0005)。所有类型手术的低危患者比例均下降,其中机器人手术降幅最大(P <.0005)。

结论

尽管引入和快速普及了 MIS,但在 2000 年后接受根治性前列腺切除术的患者中观察到了逆向分期转移。这种转移可能部分是由于 AS 的广泛应用和机构对治疗高危疾病的关注所致。

相似文献

1
Reverse stage shift at a tertiary care center: escalating risk in men undergoing radical prostatectomy.三级保健中心的反向分期转移:行根治性前列腺切除术的男性风险增加。
Cancer. 2011 Nov 1;117(21):4855-60. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26132. Epub 2011 Apr 11.
2
Current trends in patient enrollment for robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy in Belgium.比利时机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术患者入组的当前趋势。
Cancer. 2017 Nov 1;123(21):4139-4146. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30874. Epub 2017 Jul 25.
3
Adverse Pathologic Findings for Men Electing Immediate Radical Prostatectomy: Defining a Favorable Intermediate-Risk Group.男性行即刻根治性前列腺切除术的不良病理发现:定义一个有利的中危风险组。
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Jan 1;4(1):89-92. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.1879.
4
Trends in Radical Prostatectomy Risk Group Distribution in a European Multicenter Analysis of 28 572 Patients: Towards Tailored Treatment.在一项针对 28572 名患者的欧洲多中心分析中,前列腺癌根治术风险分组的趋势:向个体化治疗发展。
Eur Urol Focus. 2019 Mar;5(2):171-178. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.07.003. Epub 2017 Aug 8.
5
Radical Prostatectomy or Watchful Waiting in Prostate Cancer - 29-Year Follow-up.根治性前列腺切除术与前列腺癌观察等待-29 年随访结果。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Dec 13;379(24):2319-2329. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1807801.
6
A multinational, multi-institutional study comparing positive surgical margin rates among 22393 open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy patients.一项多国、多机构的研究比较了 22393 例开放、腹腔镜和机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术患者的阳性切缘率。
Eur Urol. 2014 Sep;66(3):450-6. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.11.018. Epub 2013 Nov 24.
7
Subtyping the Risk of Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer for Active Surveillance Based on Adverse Pathology at Radical Prostatectomy.基于根治性前列腺切除术后不良病理对中危前列腺癌进行亚型分类以用于主动监测。
J Urol. 2018 Nov;200(5):1068-1074. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.04.058. Epub 2018 Apr 17.
8
Prostatectomy pathology findings in an active surveillance population.主动监测人群中的前列腺切除术病理结果。
Arch Esp Urol. 2014 Jun;67(5):431-9.
9
Radical prostatectomy or watchful waiting in early prostate cancer.早期前列腺癌行前列腺根治性切除术或密切观察。
N Engl J Med. 2014 Mar 6;370(10):932-42. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1311593.
10
Changing Trends in Surgical Management of Prostate Cancer: The End of Overtreatment?前列腺癌手术治疗方式的变化趋势:过度治疗的终结?
Eur Urol. 2015 Aug;68(2):175-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.02.020. Epub 2015 Feb 27.

引用本文的文献

1
The Role of Salvage Radical Prostatectomy in Patients with Radiation-Resistant Prostate Cancer.挽救性根治性前列腺切除术在放射性抵抗性前列腺癌患者中的作用。
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jul 23;15(14):3734. doi: 10.3390/cancers15143734.
2
Changing trends in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Inverse stage migration-A retrospective analysis.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的变化趋势:逆向分期迁移——一项回顾性分析。
Prostate Int. 2021 Sep;9(3):157-162. doi: 10.1016/j.prnil.2021.04.002. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
3
Inverse Stage Migration in Radical Prostatectomy-A Sustaining Phenomenon.

本文引用的文献

1
Role of prostate specific antigen and immediate confirmatory biopsy in predicting progression during active surveillance for low risk prostate cancer.前列腺特异性抗原和即刻确认性活检在预测低危前列腺癌主动监测中进展的作用。
J Urol. 2011 Feb;185(2):477-82. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.09.095. Epub 2010 Dec 17.
2
EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and treatment of clinically localised disease.EAU 前列腺癌指南。第 1 部分:局限性疾病的筛查、诊断和治疗。
Eur Urol. 2011 Jan;59(1):61-71. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.10.039. Epub 2010 Oct 28.
3
New technology and health care costs--the case of robot-assisted surgery.
根治性前列腺切除术中的逆向分期迁移——一种持续现象
Front Surg. 2021 Mar 1;8:612813. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.612813. eCollection 2021.
4
Management of Men With Lymph Node Metastases Following Radical Prostatectomy: What Is the Optimal Treatment Strategy?: NYU Case of the Month, March 2020.根治性前列腺切除术后淋巴结转移男性的管理:最佳治疗策略是什么?:纽约大学2020年3月月度病例
Rev Urol. 2020;22(1):37-39.
5
A comparison of operative and margin outcomes from surgeon learning curves in robot assisted radical prostatectomy in a changing referral practice.在不断变化的转诊实践中,机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中外科医生学习曲线的手术及切缘结果比较。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2018 Mar;100(3):226-229. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2018.0001. Epub 2018 Feb 27.
6
Genomic Classifier Augments the Role of Pathological Features in Identifying Optimal Candidates for Adjuvant Radiation Therapy in Patients With Prostate Cancer: Development and Internal Validation of a Multivariable Prognostic Model.基因组分类器增强了病理特征在识别前列腺癌患者辅助放疗最佳候选者中的作用:多变量预后模型的开发与内部验证
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jun 20;35(18):1982-1990. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.69.9918. Epub 2017 Mar 28.
7
Implementation of Dynamically Updated Prediction Models at the Point of Care at a Major Cancer Center: Making Nomograms More Like Netflix.在一家大型癌症中心的医疗现场实施动态更新的预测模型:让列线图更像网飞公司。
Urology. 2017 Apr;102:1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.10.049. Epub 2016 Nov 24.
8
Magnetic Resonance Image-Guided Focal Prostate Ablation.磁共振成像引导下的局灶性前列腺消融
Semin Intervent Radiol. 2016 Sep;33(3):206-16. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1586153.
9
Incorporation of tissue-based genomic biomarkers into localized prostate cancer clinics.将基于组织的基因组生物标志物纳入局限性前列腺癌临床诊疗中。
BMC Med. 2016 Apr 4;14:67. doi: 10.1186/s12916-016-0613-7.
10
Neoadjuvant Treatment of High-Risk, Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer Prior to Radical Prostatectomy.前列腺癌根治术前高危、临床局限性前列腺癌的新辅助治疗。
Curr Urol Rep. 2016 May;17(5):37. doi: 10.1007/s11934-016-0592-4.
新技术与医疗保健成本——机器人辅助手术的案例
N Engl J Med. 2010 Aug 19;363(8):701-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1006602.
4
Cancer statistics, 2010.癌症统计数据,2010 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2010 Sep-Oct;60(5):277-300. doi: 10.3322/caac.20073. Epub 2010 Jul 7.
5
Survey of practicing urologists: robotic versus open radical prostatectomy.执业泌尿科医生调查:机器人辅助与开放式根治性前列腺切除术
Can J Urol. 2010 Apr;17(2):5094-8.
6
NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer.美国国立综合癌症网络(NCCN)肿瘤学临床实践指南:前列腺癌
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2010 Feb;8(2):162-200. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2010.0012.
7
Time trends and local variation in primary treatment of localized prostate cancer.局限性前列腺癌的主要治疗方法的时间趋势和局部变化。
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Mar 1;28(7):1117-23. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.26.0133. Epub 2010 Feb 1.
8
Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study.一项欧洲随机研究中的筛查与前列腺癌死亡率
N Engl J Med. 2009 Mar 26;360(13):1320-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0810084. Epub 2009 Mar 18.
9
Impact of reporting rules of biopsy Gleason score for prostate cancer.
J Clin Pathol. 2009 Mar;62(3):260-3. doi: 10.1136/jcp.2008.060632. Epub 2008 Oct 24.
10
Pathological upgrading and up staging with immediate repeat biopsy in patients eligible for active surveillance.对于适合主动监测的患者,通过立即重复活检进行病理升级和分期上调。
J Urol. 2008 Nov;180(5):1964-7; discussion 1967-8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.07.051. Epub 2008 Sep 17.