Wu Lie, Zhang Guo-liang, Yang Ying-xin
Department of Ophthalmology, Guang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing.
Zhongguo Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Za Zhi. 2011 Mar;31(3):342-5.
To comparatively study the clinical effect of electrical plum-blossom needle on ametropic amblyopia and anisometropic amblyopia.
Sixty children (107 eyes) with ametropic amblyopia or anisometropic amblyopia were randomly assigned to two groups at their first visit on the basis of optometry. They had never received any treatment before. Patients in one group were treated with electrical plum-blossom needle (as the treatment group) and those in the other group were treated with physical comprehensive therapy (as the control group). The 1-month clinical effect was observed.
The 1-month total effective rate was 79.6% (43/54) in the treatment group and 58.5% (31/53) in the control group. Statistical significance was shown in clinical effect after statistical management. The electrical plum-blossom needle showed better effect than the comprehensive therapy.
The electrical plum-blossom needle for treatment of amblyopia in children could initiate faster with good compliance. Its short-term effect was definite with no side effect.
比较电梅花针治疗屈光不正性弱视和屈光参差性弱视的临床效果。
60例屈光不正性弱视或屈光参差性弱视患儿（107只眼）初诊时在验光基础上随机分为两组，均未接受过任何治疗。一组采用电梅花针治疗（治疗组），另一组采用物理综合疗法治疗（对照组），观察1个月的临床疗效。
治疗组1个月总有效率为79.6%（43/54），对照组为58.5%（31/53），经统计学处理临床疗效有统计学意义，电梅花针治疗效果优于综合疗法。
电梅花针治疗儿童弱视起效快，依从性好，近期疗效确切，无副作用。
