Suppr超能文献

弱视、斜视和眼球运动障碍核心结局集的制定:一项用于识别结局指标的综述

Development of a core outcome set for amblyopia, strabismus and ocular motility disorders: a review to identify outcome measures.

作者信息

Al Jabri Samia, Kirkham Jamie, Rowe Fiona J

机构信息

Department of Health Services Research, University of Liverpool, Waterhouse Building Block B, 2nd Floor, 1-3 Brownlow Street, L69 3GL, Liverpool, UK.

Department of Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

出版信息

BMC Ophthalmol. 2019 Feb 8;19(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12886-019-1055-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Core Outcome Sets (COS) are defined as the minimum sets of outcomes that should be measured and reported in all randomised controlled trials to facilitate combination and comparability of research. The aim of this review is to produce an item bank of previously reported outcome measures from published studies in amblyopia, strabismus and ocular motility disorders to initiate the development of COS.

METHODS

A review was conducted to identify articles reporting outcome measures for amblyopia, strabismus and ocular motility disorders. Using systematic methods according to the COMET handbook we searched key electronic bibliographic databases from 1st January 2011 to 27th September 2016 using MESH terms and alternatives indicating the different subtypes of amblyopia, strabismus and ocular motility disorders in relation to treatment outcomes and all synonyms. We included Cochrane reviews, other systematic reviews, controlled trials, non-systematic reviews and retrospective studies. Data was extracted to tabulate demographics of included studies, primary and secondary outcomes, methods of measurement and their time points.

RESULTS

A total of 142 studies were included; 42 in amblyopia, 33 in strabismus, and 68 in ocular motility disorders (one study overlap between amblyopia and strabismus). We identified ten main outcome measure domains for amblyopia, 14 for strabismus, and ten common "visual or motility" outcome measure domains for ocular motility disorders. Within the domains, we found variable nomenclature being used and diversity in methods and timings of measurements.

CONCLUSION

This review highlights discrepancies in outcome measure reporting within published literature for amblyopia, strabismus and ocular motility and it generated an item bank of the most commonly used and reported outcome measures for each of the three conditions from recent literature to start the process of COS development. Consensus among all stakeholders including patients and professionals is recommended to establish a useful COS.

摘要

背景

核心结局集(COS)被定义为所有随机对照试验中应测量和报告的最小结局集,以促进研究的合并和可比性。本综述的目的是从已发表的弱视、斜视和眼球运动障碍研究中生成一个先前报告的结局测量项目库,以启动COS的制定。

方法

进行一项综述以识别报告弱视、斜视和眼球运动障碍结局测量的文章。根据COMET手册中的系统方法,我们使用医学主题词(MESH)及其替代词检索了2011年1月1日至2016年9月27日的关键电子文献数据库,这些词表明了与治疗结局相关的弱视、斜视和眼球运动障碍的不同亚型以及所有同义词。我们纳入了Cochrane综述、其他系统综述、对照试验、非系统综述和回顾性研究。提取数据以列表形式呈现纳入研究的人口统计学信息、主要和次要结局、测量方法及其时间点。

结果

共纳入142项研究;其中42项关于弱视,33项关于斜视,68项关于眼球运动障碍(弱视和斜视之间有一项研究重叠)。我们确定了弱视的10个主要结局测量领域、斜视的14个领域以及眼球运动障碍的10个常见“视觉或运动”结局测量领域。在这些领域内,我们发现使用的术语存在差异,测量方法和时间也各不相同。

结论

本综述突出了已发表文献中弱视、斜视和眼球运动障碍结局测量报告的差异,并从近期文献中生成了这三种情况各自最常用和报告的结局测量项目库,以启动COS的制定过程。建议包括患者和专业人员在内的所有利益相关者达成共识,以建立一个有用的COS。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d98/6368710/b1dbb781bf75/12886_2019_1055_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验