Williams N A, Hill T J, Hooper D C
Department of Microbiology, Medical School University of Bristol, U.K.
Immunology. 1990 Nov;71(3):411-6.
The capacity of epidermal cells (EC) to present antigen to primed and non-immune T cells was investigated using a culture system that supports antigen-specific primary and secondary proliferative responses. Although both naive and bovine serum albumin (BSA)-immune T cells reacted against BSA in the presence of either splenic or epidermal antigen-presenting cells (APC), important differences were noted in the kinetics and the magnitudes of the various responses. Most conspicuous was the relatively poor primary response supported by EC which evidently elicited very few BSA-immune T-helper cells. Despite this, the primed antigen-specific T cells recovered were phenotypically similar to those resulting from the stronger primary responses induced by spleen cells. In contrast to this disparity in the ability to prime, EC and spleen cells stimulated secondary reactions of comparable magnitude. We therefore consider that, in comparison with splenic APC, EC may require some additional stimulus to acquire the capacity to prime.
利用一种支持抗原特异性初次和二次增殖反应的培养系统,研究了表皮细胞(EC)向致敏和未免疫T细胞呈递抗原的能力。尽管在存在脾或表皮抗原呈递细胞(APC)的情况下,未致敏和牛血清白蛋白(BSA)免疫的T细胞均对BSA产生反应,但在各种反应的动力学和强度方面发现了重要差异。最明显的是EC支持的初次反应相对较弱,显然只能诱导出很少的BSA免疫T辅助细胞。尽管如此,回收的致敏抗原特异性T细胞在表型上与脾细胞诱导的较强初次反应所产生的T细胞相似。与致敏能力的这种差异形成对比的是,EC和脾细胞刺激的二次反应强度相当。因此,我们认为,与脾APC相比,EC可能需要一些额外的刺激才能获得致敏能力。