• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

A two-round Delphi study examining consensus of recommended clinical practices for patients with ventricular assist devices as destination therapy.

作者信息

Chichetti JoAnne V

机构信息

University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey School of Nursing, Newark, New Jersey, USA.

出版信息

Prog Transplant. 2011 Mar;21(1):15-26. doi: 10.1177/152692481102100103.

DOI:10.1177/152692481102100103
PMID:21485939
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To identify the current clinical practices of Medicare-certified facilities offering ventricular assist devices as destination therapy and to attain a consensus of recommended clinical practices across the United States for the management of adults with ventricular assist devices as destination therapy.

METHOD

Sixty ventricular assist device coordinators from Medicare-certified centers were invited to participate in an online, 2-round Delphi survey. The surveys asked whether recommended practices are current practices and whether respondents always/agreed or never/disagreed with performing the recommended practice guidelines. Consensus was defined as 75% agreement. The clinical areas of focus were patient selection, preoperative preparation, postoperative care, infection control, nutrition, and patient discharge preparation. Practices were extracted from the advanced practice guidelines for HeartMate destination therapy and the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation's 2006 guidelines for the care of heart transplant candidates.

RESULTS

Representing 21 states across the country, the first-round survey had a response rate of 57% (n = 34). The second-round survey had a response rate of 74% (n = 17), representing 28% of the 60 centers. Consensus was obtained for 122 practices. The dimension of patient selection-diagnostic tests and screening had the highest level of consensus (16%, n = 20), and the dimension of postoperative care-intermediate/intensive care unit dimension had the lowest level of consensus (3.3%, n = 4).

CONCLUSION

Survey results identify a consensus of practices for the specific group of ventricular assist device coordinators who responded, but that consensus cannot be generalized to all ventricular assist device facilities. These results can, however, provide a foundation for further research leading to the development of standard-of-care practices for patients with ventricular assist devices as destination therapy.

摘要

相似文献

1
A two-round Delphi study examining consensus of recommended clinical practices for patients with ventricular assist devices as destination therapy.
Prog Transplant. 2011 Mar;21(1):15-26. doi: 10.1177/152692481102100103.
2
Improving outcomes with long-term "destination" therapy using left ventricular assist devices.使用左心室辅助装置进行长期“目标”治疗以改善治疗效果。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008 Jun;135(6):1353-60; discussion 1360-1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.09.124.
3
Compassionate deactivation of ventricular assist devices in children: A survey of pediatric ventricular assist device clinicians' perspectives and practices.儿童心室辅助装置的同情性停用:儿科心室辅助装置临床医生观点与实践的调查
Pediatr Transplant. 2019 May;23(3):e13359. doi: 10.1111/petr.13359. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
4
The Joint Commission's disease-specific care certification for destination therapy ventricular assist devices.联合委员会针对目标治疗心室辅助装置的特定疾病护理认证。
Prog Transplant. 2010 Jun;20(2):155-62. doi: 10.1177/152692481002000210.
5
Survey of Anticoagulation Practices with the Impella Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device at High-Volume Centers.高容量中心使用 Impella 经皮心室辅助装置的抗凝治疗调查。
J Interv Cardiol. 2019 Mar 4;2019:3791307. doi: 10.1155/2019/3791307. eCollection 2019.
6
Association of Clinical Outcomes With Left Ventricular Assist Device Use by Bridge to Transplant or Destination Therapy Intent: The Multicenter Study of MagLev Technology in Patients Undergoing Mechanical Circulatory Support Therapy With HeartMate 3 (MOMENTUM 3) Randomized Clinical Trial.临床结局与通过桥接移植或目的地治疗意向使用左心室辅助装置的关联:使用 HeartMate 3(MOMENTUM 3)机械循环支持治疗的多中心磁悬浮技术研究(MOMENTUM 3)随机临床试验。
JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Apr 1;5(4):411-419. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.5323.
7
Diagnosis and follow-up of patients with Hunter syndrome in Spain: A Delphi consensus.西班牙亨特综合征患者的诊断与随访:德尔菲共识
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Jul;97(29):e11246. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011246.
8
Improved survival and decreasing incidence of adverse events with the HeartMate II left ventricular assist device as bridge-to-transplant therapy.使用HeartMate II左心室辅助装置作为桥接至移植治疗可提高生存率并降低不良事件发生率。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2008 Oct;86(4):1227-34; discussion 1234-5. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.06.030.
9
Variability in clinical decision-making for ventricular assist device implantation in pediatrics.小儿心室辅助装置植入临床决策的变异性
Pediatr Transplant. 2020 Dec;24(8):e13840. doi: 10.1111/petr.13840. Epub 2020 Oct 18.
10
Better With Time: An Economic Assessment of Long-Term Mechanical Circulatory Support in a Population Surviving at Least 1 Year with a Left Ventricular Assist Device.随着时间的推移而改善:在至少使用左心室辅助装置生存 1 年的人群中进行长期机械循环支持的经济评估。
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020;32(4):738-746. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2018.09.029. Epub 2018 Oct 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of the "LAser Surgical skills Evaluation for Residents" (LASER) Scale Through a Modified Delphi Method.运用改良 Delphi 法制定住院医师“激光手术技能评估”(LASER)量表。
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Jan-Dec;53:19160216241278654. doi: 10.1177/19160216241278654.
2
Therapeutic interventions for heart failure in Colombia: result of a Delphi panel.哥伦比亚心力衰竭的治疗干预:德尔菲小组的结果。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 3;19(9):e0304124. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304124. eCollection 2024.