• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

哥伦比亚心力衰竭的治疗干预:德尔菲小组的结果。

Therapeutic interventions for heart failure in Colombia: result of a Delphi panel.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Clinic of The Universidad de la Sabana, Bogotá, Colombia.

Electrophysiology Service, Sanitas Colombia Clinic, Bogotá, Colombia.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Sep 3;19(9):e0304124. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304124. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0304124
PMID:39226250
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11371197/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to validate the main therapies used in the treatment of heart failure through a clinical consensus conducted by cardiology experts in Colombia.

METHODS

The Delphi technique was employed, which involves a series of consultation rounds with experts to reach a consensus. Cardiologists with experience in HF treatment were selected, and they were sent electronic questionnaires to assess the relevance of various therapeutic interventions. Consensus was defined when at least 70% of the experts agreed on the relevance of an intervention.

RESULTS

Fourteen cardiology experts participated in the study. In the first round, nine therapeutic interventions were evaluated, but insufficient agreement was reached to form a consensus. A second round was conducted, where feedback was provided to the experts, and they were asked to rate the relevance of the interventions using a Likert scale. Consensus was achieved for eight of the evaluated therapeutic interventions. The focus of the third round was on the interventions that had not reached consensus in the previous rounds.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides clinical consensus on therapeutic interventions for HF in Colombia. Nine therapeutic interventions were identified as relevant by the experts. These findings can help improve HF treatment and optimize clinical outcomes in Colombia. It is important to note that this study was conducted with local experts, and the results may not be generalizable to other populations.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在通过哥伦比亚心脏病专家进行临床共识,验证心力衰竭治疗中主要使用的疗法。

方法

采用 Delphi 技术,通过一系列专家咨询回合达成共识。选择在 HF 治疗方面有经验的心脏病专家,并向他们发送电子问卷,以评估各种治疗干预的相关性。当至少 70%的专家同意干预的相关性时,即可达成共识。

结果

共有 14 名心脏病专家参与了这项研究。在第一轮中,评估了九种治疗干预措施,但未达成足够的共识形成共识。进行了第二轮,向专家提供了反馈,并要求他们使用李克特量表评估干预措施的相关性。评估的八种治疗干预措施中达成了共识。第三轮的重点是在前几轮未达成共识的干预措施。

结论

本研究为哥伦比亚心力衰竭的治疗干预措施提供了临床共识。专家认为九种治疗干预措施具有相关性。这些发现有助于改善哥伦比亚的 HF 治疗并优化临床结果。需要注意的是,这项研究是在当地专家的参与下进行的,研究结果可能不适用于其他人群。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a739/11371197/fffa52a32162/pone.0304124.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a739/11371197/fffa52a32162/pone.0304124.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a739/11371197/fffa52a32162/pone.0304124.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Therapeutic interventions for heart failure in Colombia: result of a Delphi panel.哥伦比亚心力衰竭的治疗干预:德尔菲小组的结果。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 3;19(9):e0304124. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304124. eCollection 2024.
2
Towards more credible shams for physical interventions: A Delphi survey.为了使物理干预更可信:德尔菲调查。
Clin Trials. 2020 Jun;17(3):295-305. doi: 10.1177/1740774520910365. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
3
Defining the Key Competencies in Radiation Protection for Endovascular Procedures: A Multispecialty Delphi Consensus Study.定义血管内操作放射防护的关键能力:多学科德尔菲共识研究。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2018 Feb;55(2):281-287. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.11.020. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
4
Development of a list of potentially inappropriate medications for patients with heart failure (PIMHF).开发一份针对心力衰竭患者的潜在不适当药物清单(PIMHF)。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2021 May;17(5):894-903. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.07.021. Epub 2020 Jul 25.
5
Capturing pharmacists' impact in general practice: an e-Delphi study to attempt to reach consensus amongst experts about what activities to record.捕捉药剂师在全科医疗中的影响:一项电子德尔菲研究,旨在尝试在专家中达成共识,确定应记录哪些活动。
BMC Fam Pract. 2019 Sep 9;20(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s12875-019-1008-6.
6
Consensus on diagnostic criteria for deficiency syndrome in hypertension: a modified Delphi study.高血压病虚证诊断标准共识:改良 Delphi 法研究。
J Tradit Chin Med. 2023 Feb;43(1):181-187. doi: 10.19852/j.cnki.jtcm.20220719.002.
7
Care bundle to reduce readmission in patients with heart failure: a modified Delphi consensus panel in Argentina.心力衰竭患者再入院减少护理包:阿根廷的德尔福共识小组改良研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 29;10(12):e040028. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040028.
8
Consensus on revised definitions of Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) features of adenomyosis: results of modified Delphi procedure.关于子宫腺肌病形态学超声评估(MUSA)特征修订定义的共识:改良 Delphi 程序的结果。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Jul;60(1):118-131. doi: 10.1002/uog.24786.
9
A modified-delphi study establishing consensus in the therapeutic management of posttrauamtic elbow stiffness.一项改良德尔菲研究,旨在就创伤后肘僵硬的治疗管理达成共识。
J Hand Ther. 2022 Apr-Jun;35(2):299-307. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2021.11.002. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
10
Development and appropriateness of a scoring method for International Classification of Functioning, Disabilities, and Health assessment in older patients with heart failure: a Delphi survey of expert panel in Japan.开发并评估适用于老年心力衰竭患者的国际功能、残疾和健康分类评估的评分方法:日本专家小组的 Delphi 调查。
BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 17;12(9):e060609. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060609.

本文引用的文献

1
2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2022年美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会/美国心力衰竭学会心力衰竭管理指南:执行摘要:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南联合委员会报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 May 3;79(17):1757-1780. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.12.011. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
2
Determining Contextual Factors for a Heart Failure Self-Care Intervention: A Consensus Delphi Study (ACHIEVE).确定心力衰竭自我护理干预的情境因素:共识 Delphi 研究(ACHIEVE)。
Health Educ Behav. 2024 Apr;51(2):311-320. doi: 10.1177/10901981211043116. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
3
Selection of Comprehensive Assessment Categories Based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health for Elderly Patients with Heart Failure: A Delphi Survey among Registered Instructors of Cardiac Rehabilitation.
基于国际功能、残疾和健康分类对老年心力衰竭患者进行综合评估类别的选择:心脏康复注册指导员的德尔菲调查。
Occup Ther Int. 2021 Jun 25;2021:6666203. doi: 10.1155/2021/6666203. eCollection 2021.
4
Diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of heart failure patients by general practitioners: A Delphi consensus statement.全科医生对心力衰竭患者的诊断、治疗及随访:德尔菲共识声明
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 31;15(12):e0244485. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244485. eCollection 2020.
5
Care bundle to reduce readmission in patients with heart failure: a modified Delphi consensus panel in Argentina.心力衰竭患者再入院减少护理包:阿根廷的德尔福共识小组改良研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 29;10(12):e040028. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040028.
6
Optimizing of a question prompt list to improve communication about the heart failure trajectory in patients, families, and health care professionals.优化问题提示清单,以改善心力衰竭轨迹在患者、家庭和医疗保健专业人员之间的沟通。
BMC Palliat Care. 2020 Oct 15;19(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-00665-3.
7
Management of patients with heart failure treated in cardiology consultations: IC-BERG Study.心脏病学会诊中治疗的心力衰竭患者的管理:IC-BERG研究。
Rev Clin Esp (Barc). 2020 Aug-Sep;220(6):339-349. doi: 10.1016/j.rce.2019.10.011. Epub 2020 Feb 26.
8
Pharmacotherapy in paediatric heart failure: a Delphi process.小儿心力衰竭的药物治疗:德尔菲法
Cardiol Young. 2019 Jul;29(7):869-876. doi: 10.1017/S1047951119000660. Epub 2019 Jun 24.
9
A Fully Magnetically Levitated Left Ventricular Assist Device - Final Report.全磁悬浮左心室辅助装置 - 最终报告。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Apr 25;380(17):1618-1627. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1900486. Epub 2019 Mar 17.
10
Defining quality indicators for heart failure in general practice.确定基层医疗中心力衰竭的质量指标。
Acta Cardiol. 2019 Aug;74(4):291-298. doi: 10.1080/00015385.2018.1492659. Epub 2018 Sep 27.