Radick Gregory
Centre for History and Philosophy of Science, Department of Philosophy, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci. 2011 Jun;42(2):129-38. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2010.11.019. Epub 2011 Feb 22.
Physics matters less than we once thought to the making of Mendel. But it matters more than we tend to recognize to the making of Mendelism. This paper charts the variety of ways in which diverse kinds of physics impinged upon the Galtonian tradition which formed Mendelism's matrix. The work of three Galtonians in particular is considered: Francis Galton himself, W. F. R. Weldon and William Bateson. One aim is to suggest that tracking influence from physics can bring into focus important but now little-remembered flexibilities in the Galtonian tradition. Another is to show by example why generalizations about what happens when 'physics' meets 'biology' require caution. Even for a single research tradition in Britain in the decades around 1900, these categories were large, containing multitudes.
物理学对于孟德尔的形成所起的作用比我们曾经认为的要小。但对于孟德尔主义的形成,其作用比我们通常所认识到的要大。本文梳理了各种物理学以多样方式对形成孟德尔主义母体的高尔顿传统产生影响的情况。特别考察了三位高尔顿主义者的工作:弗朗西斯·高尔顿本人、W. F. R. 韦尔登和威廉·贝特森。一个目的是表明,追踪来自物理学的影响能够使高尔顿传统中重要但如今已鲜为人知的灵活性凸显出来。另一个目的是通过实例说明,为何对“物理学”与“生物学”相遇时所发生情况的概括需要谨慎。即使对于1900年前后几十年英国的单一研究传统而言,这些类别范围广泛,包含了众多内容。