• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英格兰结直肠癌手术后 30 天的术后死亡率。

Thirty-day postoperative mortality after colorectal cancer surgery in England.

机构信息

Colorectal Cancer Epidemiology Group, Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Leeds, St James's Institute of Oncology, St James's Hospital Leeds, Leeds, UK.

出版信息

Gut. 2011 Jun;60(6):806-13. doi: 10.1136/gut.2010.232181. Epub 2011 Apr 12.

DOI:10.1136/gut.2010.232181
PMID:21486939
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess the variation in risk-adjusted 30-day postoperative mortality for patients with colorectal cancer between hospital trusts within the English NHS.

DESIGN

Retrospective cross-sectional population-based study of data extracted from the National Cancer Data Repository.

SETTING

All providers of major colorectal cancer surgery within the English NHS.

PARTICIPANTS

All 160,920 individuals who underwent major resection for colorectal cancer diagnosed between 1998 and 2006 in the English NHS. Main outcome measures National patterns of 30-day postoperative mortality were examined and logistic binary regression was used to study factors associated with death within 30 days of surgery. Funnel plots were used to show variation between trusts in risk-adjusted mortality.

RESULTS

Overall 30-day mortality was 6.7% but decreased over time from 6.8% in 1998 to 5.8% in 2006. The largest reduction in mortality was seen in 2005 and 2006. Postoperative mortality increased with age (15.0% (95% CI 14.1% to 15.9%) for those aged >80 years), comorbidity (24.2% (95% CI 22.0% to 26.5%) for those with a Charlson comorbidity score ≥ 3), stage of disease (9.9% (95% CI 9.3% to 10.6%) for patients with Dukes' D disease), socioeconomic deprivation (7.8% (95% CI 7.2% to 8.4%) for residents of the most deprived quintile) and operative urgency (14.9% (95% CI 14.2% to 15.7%) for patients undergoing emergency resection). Risk-adjusted control charts showed that one trust had consistently significantly better outcomes and three had significantly worse outcomes than the population mean.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant variation in 30-day postoperative mortality following major colorectal cancer surgery existed between NHS hospitals in England throughout the period 1998-2006. Understanding the underlying causes of this variation between surgical providers will make it possible to identify and spread best practice, improve outcomes and, ultimately, reduce 30-day postoperative mortality following colorectal cancer surgery.

摘要

目的

评估英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)内不同医院信托基金之间接受结直肠癌治疗的患者术后 30 天风险调整死亡率的差异。

设计

对国家癌症数据库中提取的数据进行回顾性的基于人群的横断面研究。

地点

英国 NHS 内所有主要结直肠癌手术提供者。

参与者

1998 年至 2006 年间在英国 NHS 接受主要结直肠癌切除术的 160920 名患者。主要观察指标:检查术后 30 天内死亡率的国家模式,并使用逻辑二元回归分析与术后 30 天内死亡相关的因素。使用漏斗图显示信托基金之间风险调整死亡率的差异。

结果

总体术后 30 天死亡率为 6.7%,但随着时间的推移逐渐下降,从 1998 年的 6.8%下降到 2006 年的 5.8%。死亡率最大降幅出现在 2005 年和 2006 年。术后死亡率随年龄增长而增加(80 岁以上患者为 15.0%(95%可信区间 14.1%至 15.9%)),合并症(Charlson 合并症评分≥3 分的患者为 24.2%(95%可信区间 22.0%至 26.5%)),疾病分期(Dukes'D 期患者为 9.9%(95%可信区间 9.3%至 10.6%)),社会经济剥夺(最贫困五分位数的居民为 7.8%(95%可信区间 7.2%至 8.4%))和手术紧急程度(急诊手术患者为 14.9%(95%可信区间 14.2%至 15.7%))。风险调整控制图显示,1 家信托基金的结果始终明显优于人群平均水平,而 3 家信托基金的结果明显差于人群平均水平。

结论

1998 年至 2006 年间,英格兰 NHS 内不同医院之间接受结直肠癌主要手术后 30 天内的术后死亡率存在显著差异。了解手术提供者之间这种差异的潜在原因将有可能识别和推广最佳实践,改善结果,并最终降低结直肠癌手术后 30 天内的死亡率。

相似文献

1
Thirty-day postoperative mortality after colorectal cancer surgery in England.英格兰结直肠癌手术后 30 天的术后死亡率。
Gut. 2011 Jun;60(6):806-13. doi: 10.1136/gut.2010.232181. Epub 2011 Apr 12.
2
A retrospective observational study of length of stay in hospital after colorectal cancer surgery in England (1998-2010).一项针对英格兰地区结直肠癌手术后住院时长的回顾性观察研究(1998 - 2010年)。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Nov;95(47):e5064. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005064.
3
Aspects of survival from colorectal cancer in Denmark.丹麦结直肠癌的生存情况
Dan Med J. 2012 Apr;59(4):B4428.
4
Who requires emergency surgery for colorectal cancer and can national screening programmes reduce this need?哪些结直肠癌患者需要紧急手术,国家筛查计划能否减少这种需求?
Int J Surg. 2017 Jun;42:60-68. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.04.050. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
5
Nonelective excisional colorectal surgery in English National Health Service Trusts: a study of outcomes from Hospital Episode Statistics Data between 1996 and 2007.英国国民保健制度信托机构中无选择性结直肠切除术:1996 年至 2007 年医院出院统计数据的研究结果。
J Am Coll Surg. 2010 Apr;210(4):390-401. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.11.017.
6
Effect of public reporting of surgeons' outcomes on patient selection, "gaming," and mortality in colorectal cancer surgery in England: population based cohort study.英国结直肠手术中外科医生手术结果的公众报告对患者选择、“博弈”和死亡率的影响:基于人群的队列研究。
BMJ. 2018 May 2;361:k1581. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k1581.
7
Deprivation and colorectal cancer surgery: longer-term survival inequalities are due to differential postoperative mortality between socioeconomic groups.剥夺与结直肠癌手术:更长时间的生存不平等是由于社会经济群体之间术后死亡率的差异造成的。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Jul;20(7):2132-9. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-2959-9. Epub 2013 Mar 26.
8
Rectal cancer in old age -is it appropriately managed? Evidence from population-based analysis of routine data across the English national health service.老年直肠癌——是否得到了恰当的治疗?基于英国国民保健系统常规数据的人群分析证据。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019 Jul;45(7):1196-1204. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.01.005. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
9
A randomised controlled trial to assess the cost-effectiveness of intensive versus no scheduled follow-up in patients who have undergone resection for colorectal cancer with curative intent.一项随机对照试验,旨在评估对有治愈意图的结直肠癌切除术后患者进行强化随访与非定期随访的成本效益。
Health Technol Assess. 2017 May;21(32):1-86. doi: 10.3310/hta21320.
10
Role of Emergency Laparoscopic Colectomy for Colorectal Cancer: A Population-based Study in England.腹腔镜紧急结肠切除术在结直肠癌治疗中的作用:来自英国的一项基于人群的研究。
Ann Surg. 2019 Jul;270(1):172-179. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002752.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcomes of colonic stent as a bridge to surgery emergency surgery for acute obstructive left-sided colon cancer.结肠支架作为急性梗阻性左半结肠癌手术急诊手术桥梁的结局
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2025 Jul 27;17(7):104118. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i7.104118.
2
Effect of Early Postoperative Mobilization on Functional Recovery, Hospital Length of Stay, and Postoperative Complications After Immediate Internal Pudendal Artery Perforator Flap Reconstruction for Irradiated Abdominoperineal Resection Defects: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial.早期术后活动对放射性腹会阴切除术后缺损即刻行阴部内动脉穿支皮瓣重建术后功能恢复、住院时间及术后并发症的影响:一项前瞻性随机对照试验
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Feb;32(2):993-1004. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-16497-x. Epub 2024 Nov 18.
3
Survival benefit of surgery in elderly patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.手术对老年局部晚期直肠癌患者的生存获益
Am J Cancer Res. 2024 Oct 15;14(10):4956-4968. doi: 10.62347/XSKR3897. eCollection 2024.
4
Contact X-ray Brachytherapy as a sole treatment in selected patients with early rectal cancer - Multi-centre study.接触性X线近距离放射疗法作为早期直肠癌特定患者的单一治疗方法——多中心研究
Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2024 Sep 6;49:100851. doi: 10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100851. eCollection 2024 Nov.
5
Outcomes Following Colorectal Cancer Surgeries at the Basildon and Thurrock University Hospital.巴西尔登和瑟罗克大学医院结直肠癌手术后的结果
Cureus. 2024 May 28;16(5):e61261. doi: 10.7759/cureus.61261. eCollection 2024 May.
6
Contact X-ray brachytherapy (CXB) as a salvage treatment for rectal cancer patients who developed local tumor re-growth after watch-and-wait approach.接触性X线近距离放射治疗(CXB)作为对在观察等待方案后出现局部肿瘤复发的直肠癌患者的挽救性治疗。
J Contemp Brachytherapy. 2024 Apr;16(2):95-102. doi: 10.5114/jcb.2024.139049. Epub 2024 Apr 23.
7
Exploring 6 years of colorectal cancer surgery in rural Italy: insights from 648 consecutive patients unveiling successes and challenges.探索意大利农村 6 年的结直肠癌手术:648 例连续患者的见解揭示了成功与挑战。
Updates Surg. 2024 Jun;76(3):963-974. doi: 10.1007/s13304-024-01829-z. Epub 2024 Apr 17.
8
Carcinoembryonic Antigen CEA - Prognostic Value in Immediate Post-Operative Mortality in Colorectal Cancer.癌胚抗原CEA——对结直肠癌术后即刻死亡率的预后价值
Curr Health Sci J. 2023 Oct-Dec;49(4):579-583. doi: 10.12865/CHSJ.49.04.14. Epub 2023 Dec 29.
9
Quality indicators in surgical oncology: systematic review of measures used to compare quality across hospitals.外科肿瘤学质量指标:用于比较医院间质量的措施的系统评价。
BJS Open. 2024 Mar 1;8(2). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae009.
10
Wearable Sensors as a Preoperative Assessment Tool: A Review.可穿戴传感器作为术前评估工具:综述。
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Jan 12;24(2):482. doi: 10.3390/s24020482.