Thangavelu Govindarajan, Smolarchuk Christa, Anderson Colin C
Department of Surgery; Alberta Diabetes Institute; University of Alberta; Edmonton, Alberta Canada.
Self Nonself. 2010 Apr;1(2):77-88. doi: 10.4161/self.1.2.11548. Epub 2010 Feb 16.
Nearly forty years ago the concept was proposed that lymphocytes are negatively regulated by what are now called co-inhibitory signals. Nevertheless, it is only the more recent identification of numerous co-inhibitors and their critical functions that has brought co-inhibition to the forefront of immunologic research. Although co-inhibitory signals have been considered to directly regulate conventional T cells, more recent data has indicated a convergence between co-inhibitory signals and the other major negative control mechanism in the periphery that is mediated by regulatory T cells. Furthermore, it is now clear that lymphocytes are not the sole domain of co-inhibitory signals, as cells of the innate immune system, themselves controllers of immunity, are regulated by co-inhibitors they express. Thus, in order to better understand negative regulation in the periphery and apply this knowledge to the treatment of disease, a major focus for the future should be the definition of the conditions where co-inhibition controls effector cells intrinsically versus extrinsically (via regulatory or innate cells).
近四十年前,有人提出淋巴细胞受到如今所谓共抑制信号的负调控这一概念。然而,只是在最近发现了众多共抑制因子及其关键功能之后,共抑制作用才成为免疫研究的前沿领域。尽管共抑制信号一直被认为直接调控传统T细胞,但最新数据表明,共抑制信号与外周由调节性T细胞介导的另一种主要负调控机制之间存在趋同现象。此外,现在很清楚,淋巴细胞并非共抑制信号的唯一作用领域,因为先天免疫系统的细胞本身作为免疫的调控者,也受到它们所表达的共抑制因子的调控。因此,为了更好地理解外周的负调控并将这一知识应用于疾病治疗,未来的一个主要重点应该是明确共抑制作用在何种条件下内在地(即直接地)而非外在地(即通过调节性或先天免疫细胞)控制效应细胞。