Department of Internal Medicine, Graduate School, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Surg Endosc. 2011 Sep;25(9):3087-93. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1674-5. Epub 2011 Apr 13.
Recently, endoscopic submucosal dissection has been carefully applied in early gastric cancer (EGC) with undifferentiated type. However, there are no individual guidelines for endoscopic treatment of EGCs with poorly differentiated tubular adenocarcinoma or signet ring cell carcinoma. The aim of this study was to investigate and compare the clinicopathologic features of these two types of EGC to guide the application of endoscopic treatment.
Patients to undergo radical gastrectomy for the treatment of EGC were selected for inclusion in this study. Histology was classified according to the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Between January 2005 and December 2008, 288 patients with poorly differentiated EGC and 419 patients with signet ring cell EGC were enrolled. Their medical records were reviewed retrospectively.
Compared with signet ring cell EGC, poorly differentiated EGC had higher rates of male gender, old age (≥45 years), large tumor length (>20 mm), ulcer, submucosal invasion, lymphovascular invasion, and lymph node metastasis. In the multivariate analyses, poorly differentiated EGC was significantly associated with ulcer (odds ratio [OR]: 2.4, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.5-3.8), submucosal invasion (OR: 3.6, 95% CI: 2.6-5.1) and lymphovascular invasion (OR: 2.0, 95% CI: 1.1-3.6) with a reference of signet ring cell EGC. The independent risk factors for lymph node metastasis were large tumor length, submucosal invasion, and lymphovascular invasion in both types of EGC. Young age was an independent risk factor of lymph node metastasis only in poorly differentiated EGC.
Poorly differentiated EGC has clinicopathologic features that are less favorable to endoscopic treatment than are those of signet ring cell EGC. Therefore, these two types of EGC should be approached separately, not as a united type of undifferentiated histology, during the planning of endoscopic treatment.
最近,内镜黏膜下剥离术已被仔细应用于未分化型早期胃癌(EGC)。然而,对于分化差的管状腺癌或印戒细胞癌的 EGC,尚无内镜治疗的个体化指南。本研究旨在探讨和比较这两种类型 EGC 的临床病理特征,以指导内镜治疗的应用。
选择接受根治性胃切除术治疗 EGC 的患者纳入本研究。组织学根据日本胃癌协会进行分类。2005 年 1 月至 2008 年 12 月,纳入 288 例分化差的 EGC 患者和 419 例印戒细胞癌 EGC 患者。回顾性分析其病历资料。
与印戒细胞癌 EGC 相比,分化差的 EGC 中男性、年龄较大(≥45 岁)、肿瘤长度较大(>20mm)、溃疡、黏膜下浸润、血管淋巴管浸润和淋巴结转移的发生率较高。多因素分析显示,分化差的 EGC 与溃疡(比值比 [OR]:2.4,95%置信区间 [CI]:1.5-3.8)、黏膜下浸润(OR:3.6,95% CI:2.6-5.1)和血管淋巴管浸润(OR:2.0,95% CI:1.1-3.6)显著相关,以印戒细胞癌 EGC 为参考。两种类型的 EGC 中,淋巴结转移的独立危险因素均为肿瘤长度较大、黏膜下浸润和血管淋巴管浸润。年轻是分化差的 EGC 淋巴结转移的独立危险因素。
分化差的 EGC 的临床病理特征不如印戒细胞癌 EGC 有利于内镜治疗。因此,在制定内镜治疗计划时,应分别对待这两种类型的 EGC,而不是将其视为未分化组织学的统一类型。