Nielsen O S, Munro A J, Duncan W, Sturgeon J, Gospodarowicz M K, Jewett M A, Malkin A, Thomas G M
Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Radiumstationen, Aarhus, Denmark.
Eur J Cancer. 1990;26(10):1049-54. doi: 10.1016/0277-5379(90)90049-y.
The usefulness of placental alkaline phosphatase (PLAP) as a tumour marker was assessed in 1578 serum samples from 236 patients with seminoma. Smoking habits were known for all but 7 patients (22 samples). Smoking was associated with significantly higher mean levels of PLAP in disease-free patients (28.8 [S.E. 2.1] U/l vs. 15.9 [1.3] U/l in non-smokers). Mean PLAP levels were higher in patients with active disease (78.6 [23.5] U/l in non-smokers and 47.2 [18.5] U/l in smokers). The median values showed a similar trend. However, there was considerable overlap between the various groups and differences between mean and median values indicated that PLAP values were distributed asymmetrically. The predictive value of PLAP as a tumour marker was consequently much less than superficial inspection of these values might suggest. In 97 patients on surveillance, only 2 out of 11 patients who relapsed had elevated PLAP at the time of clinically detectable relapse. With the upper limit of normal PLAP quoted by our laboratory (35 U/l), specificity and sensitivity were, respectively, 88% and 45% (all patients) and 96% and 47% (non-smokers). The sensitivity and specificity of PLAP were assessed in more detail for a series of threshold values (normal vs. abnormal) with a graphical method. Only in non-smokers did PLAP seem useful and even in this group the positive predictive value of an "abnormal" test may be low; less than 50% in clinically relevant circumstances. Serum PLAP assay cannot usefully stand alone as a marker for seminoma and its routine estimation contributes little to follow-up.
对236例精原细胞瘤患者的1578份血清样本评估了胎盘碱性磷酸酶(PLAP)作为肿瘤标志物的效用。除7例患者(22份样本)外,其他患者的吸烟习惯均已知。在无疾病患者中,吸烟与PLAP的平均水平显著升高相关(吸烟者为28.8 [标准误2.1] U/l,非吸烟者为15.9 [1.3] U/l)。疾病活动期患者的PLAP平均水平更高(非吸烟者为78.6 [23.5] U/l,吸烟者为47.2 [18.5] U/l)。中位数显示出类似趋势。然而,不同组之间存在相当大的重叠,且平均值和中位数之间的差异表明PLAP值呈不对称分布。因此,PLAP作为肿瘤标志物的预测价值远低于对这些值的表面观察可能显示的结果。在97例接受监测的患者中,11例复发患者中只有2例在临床可检测到复发时PLAP升高。以我们实验室引用的PLAP正常上限(35 U/l)计算,特异性和敏感性分别为88%和45%(所有患者)以及96%和47%(非吸烟者)。采用图形方法对一系列阈值(正常与异常)更详细地评估了PLAP的敏感性和特异性。仅在非吸烟者中PLAP似乎有用,即使在该组中,“异常”检测的阳性预测值可能也较低;在临床相关情况下低于50%。血清PLAP检测不能单独有效地作为精原细胞瘤的标志物,其常规评估对随访贡献不大。